B-Man

This is illegal. Joe and his gang don't care.

Biden has NEVER been a good man. Push Play.

Simple. Right after President Trump is sworn in, he will be killed. (at least that's what I heard) .

The Supreme Court established 40 years ago that presidents are immune from civil prosecution. Before today, it was never required for the Supreme Court to weigh in on criminal prosecution, because presidents never went after their predecessors in this manner. Joe Biden changed that forever. And the Supreme Court dealt a significant blow to his lawfare against President Trump.

.

They used to be reliable I guess.

PANIC is right. People aren't bowing to our words anymore.

Don't forget the many Trump Monuments that will be built

THE SUPREME COURT DOES THE RIGHT THING By John Hindraker Today the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of Donald Trump for, among other things, asserting his legal rights in the aftermath of the 2020 election. The issue in the appeal was the scope of presidential immunity. For their own reasons, both Trump and many Democrats chose to portray the Court’s 6-3 decision as a great victory for Trump. In fact, the Court steered a middle course, as most knowledgeable observers had expected. The Court’s decision held, briefly, that a president is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for all “actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.” He is entitled to a presumption of immunity for “all his official acts.” But there is no immunity for his “unofficial acts.” This is a moderate and sensible resolution of the unprecedented issues raised by Smith’s (absurd, in my view) prosecution. The difficulty, as the Court’s decision by Chief Justice Roberts recognized, is that applying these principles requires close attention to the facts. This case has been hurried through the courts because the Democratic Party was desperate to convict Trump of something–anything!–before the election. Therefore, the necessary factual development to properly apply the Court’s principles does not yet exist, and the Court remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion–a very common appellate procedure. {snip} In short, there is nothing surprising about today’s decision. It is consistent with where most observers thought the case was going following oral argument. It represents a moderate, compromise position–and a correct one, in my opinion. Generally speaking, appellate courts lay out broad legal principles which then are applied to specific cases by trial courts. Most often, that is the decisive stage, and the important decision is the one rendered by the jury. This case deviated from the norm because it was driven not by conventional legal practice, but by the Democrats’ determination to bring it to trial quickly so as to get a guilty verdict against Trump before November’s election. That plan has been foiled by the Supreme Court’s reasonable approach. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/07/the-supreme-court-does-the-right-thing.php

BACK TO THE THREAD. MSNBC Gives Extremely Absurd ‘Analysis’ About Latest Supreme Court Decision https://redstate.com/levon/2024/07/01/msnbc-gives-extremely-absurd-analysis-about-latest-supreme-court-decision-n2176228 Bill Barr Rips Through Justice Sotomayor's Hysteria Over the SCOTUS Presidential Immunity Ruling https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2024/07/01/bill-bar-rips-through-justice-sotomayors-hysteria-from-scotus-immunity-ruling-n2176239 ,

Well there goes my vote. In his second (endless) term he will set up re-education camps for all the democrats, . . . . . . . . . . . . . in TEXAS ! He will hang on so long that Donald Jr will be too old to take over. It will be Emperor Barron the First. .

They are crazy Criticism is Interference ? Do they even hear themselves ? Biden Campaign Official Accuses Media of ‘Election Interference’ in Biden Debate Coverage By Matt Funicello https://redstate.com/mdempsey/2024/07/02/biden-campaign-official-says-redstate-guilty-of-election-interference-n2176253 .

Antifa Goons Who Attacked Trump Supporters in San Diego Sentenced to Jail. Eight members of an Antifa group were sentenced to jail last Friday. The underlying incident happened in San Diego back in January 2021 when a pro-Trump rally was met by an equal number of counter-protesters. Many of the counter-protesters were anti-fascists dressed in black clothes and prepared to attack people that day. The case dragged on because of the pandemic but in June 2022 11 members of the group were indicted by a grand jury. https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2024/07/01/antifa-goons-who-attacked-trump-supporters-in-san-diego-sentenced-to-jail-n3791264 .

So . . . . . . . . . . nothing on the universally criticized dissent by Sotomayor. Just a childish attempt to divert. okay. . .

Sotomayor's Dissent in Presidential Immunity Case Certainly Has People Talking Rebecca Downs On Monday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision of Trump v. United States that the office of the United States presidency has immunity from criminal prosecution. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the dissent, which Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson also signed onto. It's a dissent that has plenty of people talking over social media, with a common theme of the reaction being "bats**t" to describe her ranting and raving. "With fear for our democracy, I dissent," she wrote in what sounds like a line the Biden reelection will almost certainly take advantage of. She also began her dissent in part by writing that "the Court gives former President Trump all the immunity he asked for and more. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/rebeccadowns/2024/07/01/sotomayor-dissent-n2641206 .

.