nkreed

I'm agreeing with everyone here. This was blatant OPI

Buck Frady!

Does a 10 second runoff only occur if they change the ruling on the field? The clock was running when they went under the hood.

The refs messed up twice in that review...It WAS a fumble. Then they didn't do a 10 second runoff after since it was a running clock...

I'm going to guess it'll be Rich Stadium again. Maybe one of their brands like Carvel Stadium (a terrible name IMO). The other possibility seems like M&T finally taking the naming rights to their HOMETOWN stadium. Not this Baltimore randomness. But that lasts until 2027.

He was advocating for a Wildcat play without Allen. 😉 I do appreciate bringing this back to the front page. Any updates as the week progresses would be great.

Except when it is.... https://youtu.be/AbZ7EpmaK_o

That's correct. I kept yelling at the MNF crew to tell us he was back on the field.

That's an interesting view, it could be considered a pitch... That's very interesting.

Why the gray facemasks? Go white forever...

This crew is ridiculous. Also it was an incomplete pass on 4th down.

There has been some awakening on race, by whites, since the mid 80s. I think that while there is blamed to be placed, racism was instituted well before and the policy makes in the 80's just had a different view. As America decides it's finally okay to speak about these ideas is incremental progress. Let's keep making it more of a conversation that or legislative electors understand. But which bot is going to call me an idiot?

Wait a second, I'm catching up to this thread... Did those who engaged in constant belittling of others move to another website... Like a three bills drive site? With that said, if they aren't coming back on, let's not turn this into an echo chamber.

If I were a being man, I would assume that this was human error. This article says it may have been, but could also be software. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.freep.com/amp/6185031002

Yes even at 9k votes it's that spread between the candidates that changes the leads. So a 55:45 split in favor of Trump only translates into a max 900 vote difference in change, assuming no 3rd party candidates are voted for. I am quoting you but not directing that statement at you. I just wanted to make sure that it would be hard to have 9k ballots make major changes.

In PA all of those "late ballots" have been sequestered and have not been counted at all. It doesn't change anything. There is a BIG difference between counting those that were received after Tuesday and counting days after the election. The conservative media has purposely been blurring these lines to make it seem like the ballots counted in PA right now have been received AFTER Tuesday.

My desperation detector broke in '16. I have been saying I needed to get a new one since. Thanks! I don't disagree on the disputing of the election was premeditated. At this point I don't believe that his disputes can lead to a change in these results, however. He will need to find Federal statues to bring these disputes to the Supreme Court.

My sarcasm detector hasn't been calibrated in a few hours, care to let me know if it should be going off on this post. The only thing that strikes me here as possible you believe this is that you included Arizona. It's the only state that hasn't been criticized as having been fraud by Trump.

NYTimes has this on their live results for Arizona. We just received more votes from Gila County. According to turnout estimates, around 310,000 votes remain in counties won by Trump in 2016. Clinton 2016 counties have around 70,000 votes left to report. 3m ago So for context, however here's the 2016 map. https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/arizona Maricopa was won by trump in 16. It is likely many of those 310,000 remaining votes. According to NYT's estimates, the MAX votes that are in all other counties would be 45,498 ballots. That would mean that ~264K votes are coming from Maricopa. I believe that its unlikely that Trump makes that up.

The only benefit I see in them failing to do this would be a change to a Three Party System, which would help the voting process out IMMENSELY! (IMO)

Did Wisconsin's Secretary of State say that all votes have been tallied, except for a township of 300 ppl?

If true, then Trump's road to a victory is slim. Especially considering it's Mail In's which have swung heavily to Biden.

So the rough numbers are close. If we are using the numbers as exact, and we shouldn't, but lets runs the scenarios. Facts I'm using from NYTimes political page: 86% in, Biden has 1,410,977 votes, Trump has 1,317,468 votes. That's a total of 2,728,445 votes and a difference of 93,509 Votes. Using the 86% number, the total AZ voted would be 3,172,611 (rounded up). Remaining votes uncounted 444,166 votes. So what are the possibilities? (you can do some linear algebra to get the numbers in between) Trump 80%, Biden 20% of the remaining votes: Trump Gains 266,500 Trump 75%, Biden 25%: Trump Gains 222,083 Trump 70%, Biden 30%: Trump Gains 177,666 Trump 65%, Biden 35%: Trump Gains 133,250 Trump 60%, Biden 40%: Trump Gains 88, 833 Trump 55%, Biden 45%: Trump Gains 44,417 50/50 Not Gains So the break even for Trump needs to be 60.5% of the remaining votes, which I believe is VERY doable. Then the Libretarian throws a 1% monkey wrench in these numbers and I'm too lazy to break that down.

With the amount of problems that can happen in the postal service, I respectfully disagree that votes must have been received by the deadline. I believe that requiring your mail in ballot be received by the election there are too many possibilities that can cause it to be late that are NOT on that voter. I believe it would be disenfranchisement to those who legally voted. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with use a postmark as your decision maker. In fact many federal and state legal processes use this as their determing factor for timeliness. It shouldn't change at the whim of a party. Also, those who vote by mail who would be forced to send their vote in earlier than the election day may miss important information that comes near the end of a campaign. I would like to ask for clarification here: are you asking for reporting or just counting? Thank you for sharing this tweet. That's why Trump's campaign is mad at the call by AP and Fox News. Even as such, it may not be enough, but who knows. 🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏽🤷🏿‍♂️ it's 2020.

I think the question should rather be: At what length of time would you decide voting wasn't worth it. I would expect a lie in response, since they haven't had to make that decision....EVER. That's different than those who face disenfranchisement annually. I would expect that those people's length of time would decrease with frequency (which is the real reason for making it tougher to vote).