Rob's House

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36774/walsh-why-fbi-should-investigate-christine-ford-matt-walsh

Every decent human being in America should go to the polls and vote straight Republican this year. I normally prefer gridlock to keep either party from getting too much power, (Dems w/ bare majority in the house, Reps with Presidency and Senate is ideal) but a message needs to be sent that this nasty, divisive, immoral behavior of the Democrats will not go unpunished.

It will also deter false accusers from coming clean. Although that's easily remedied by making an exception for those who come clean on their own.

Why would the Republicans pay him to post on a small sub-forum like this?

You do realize that most people aren't political junkies and only catch what they hear on the news. Do you also realize that CNN, NBC, and several other prominent national news outlets still haven't reported that Ford's ex came out stating that she lied multiple times under oath, including lying about never helping anyone prepare for a polygraph, her fear of flying, and claustrophobia? The msm is the propaganda wing of the Democrat party.

It was a gross miscalculation by the dems. It reminds me of a professor who told me about all these Republican women who would vote for Hillary's vagina if she ran. You see how that worked out. The people I know who are the most outraged about the treatment of Kavanaugh are older women.

Rush just made an excellent point about Trump's comments. People who only watch mainstream media had no idea that the story was inconsistent and uncorroborated because all they were reporting was that she was brave and credible. The coverage of Trump's "mockery" is the first time a lot of people heard that side of the story. They hate him because he obstructs their ability to hide the truth from the masses.

The word "additional" seems unnecessary.

Because Trump isn't a politician who tiptoes around the truth for fear of offending people who already hate him. He drops his rooster on the table and says suck it.

Yeah, but at the rate we were going, in 30 years health insurance might have gotten this expensive anyway, so it's all good.

I don't remember exactly which articles, it's been a while. I do recall there was one that gave a "factual" breakdown of some polling trends and the source material didn't support the assertion at all. If you want to see what I'm talking about just check the source material today while you're perusing Vox. You might be surprised by what you find.

I read the sourced articles themselves. They didn't support the articles claims.

The Democrats intentionally created a trial-by-ambush kangaroo court where they all publicly, decisively, and unequivocally declared a man to be a sexual predator based on the inconsistent and ever-changing story of a left-wing activist which has been refuted at every point at which corroboration might have been possible. In doing so they put him, his wife, and children through hell, exploited the whole issue of sexual abuse, wiped their feet on the principle of presumed innocence, and spit in the face of everyone who has ever been falsely accused of, or been a victim of sexual abuse. And you think Trump recounting the holes in her story is more egregious? Get fukked.

I'm not trying to pile on, but I've read sourced pieces from Vox that appeared factual on the surface but turned out to be bull **** once I checked out the sources. Now when I see someone post a link to a Vox article I won't even click on it.

Revolting, ain't it?

This is the "mocking" these douche bags are crying about.

I was at this guy's hearing for a writ of actual innocence. This story is definitely worth reading. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.richmond.com/news/virginia/innocence-case-stemmed-from-perjury-not-error/article_f7847128-377e-11e2-b2a7-001a4bcf6878.amp.html

Dude, chill with the racist talk. She's married to you.

!@#$ it, man. Let's go bowling.

Whaley should be fired before the close of business today.

There was a case last year where a 5 year old girl accused her father of molesting her. The forensic psychologist who interviewed her was 100% certain he was guilty. They filed charges, he was arrested, lost his job, and had his name run through the mud. A slight inconsistency in mom's story caught the attention of a detective who asked to see her phone. He found a hypnosis track she had made telling her daughter that daddy touches her privates and using the same verbage the child used. Had it not been for a stroke of luck he's likely in prison and branded a sex offender for life. Mom was only convicted of a few misdemeanors.

From what I can gather, the message from the left is this: Any woman who accuses any man of any offense that is sexual in nature should be unconditionally believed unless and until her story is proved to be categorically false. That's the standard they're demanding.

Giving up 22 pts to a team that came in averaging 23 pts/game isn't that bad, especially when the offense turns it over 3x and can't sustain drives. Scoring 0 against a team that came in averaging 28 points against, especially when the D gives you 2 turnovers, is abysmal. The offense was far worse than the defense today. It isn't even debateable.

I'm kind of surprised the Packers are so heavily favored. They're 1-1-1 and should be 0-3 right now. A classic choke job from a sorry Bears squad and 3 missed FGs from MN's kicker is the difference. I know they're still dangerous, but I see this as a game a good team should win handily, not a long shot against an elite opponent.