Rob's House

He appeals to young people who are want to feel unique and independent. Interestingly, his primary draw, at least for a large portion of them, isn't ideological. It's just that he's outside the mainstream. There is a considerable amount of overlap between those who support him and those who support Ron Paul, even though their core political philosophies are diametrically opposed to each other. Also, young people tend to be passionate, uninformed, and idealistic, which is very fertile ground for socialists. I wish there was a way to get all conservatives to go around telling every liberal they know things like "I would vote for a Democrat if they nominated someone who's moderate and reasonable, like Cory Booker." It would be the most entertaining Presidential race ever. Spartacus 2020!!!

Kanye has more balls than any pop-culture celebrity out there. When Colin Suckadick does his gay protest that's roundly applauded by an adoring media he's called courageous. Kanye knowingly exposed himself to the unbridled scorn of the national media by saying what he believed, and he's called a crazy negro. This is how Democrats treat a negro who wanders off the plantation.

Hillary never was that cunning and neither was Webb Hubbell.

Brook Baldwin's show is actually pretty good if you mute it.

I'm pulling for Corey Booker. Dude's such a joke I can't take him seriously. It tickles me when lefties get tingly over him. They think he's the next Obama. He may be a clean, articulate, half-black guy, but he's no Obama. For all his shortcomings, Obama could read a hell of a speech. Booker can't speak for ****. He looks like a guy playing a politician in a Lifetime movie.

They're the most self-serving, disingenuous bunch of douche bags. I want to tell them to stop sucking their own dicks.

You continue to prove my point. I've addressed your lies and mischaracterizations item by item, so I'm not sure why you keep asking. Your comment about the majority of Mexicans having nothing to do with cartels is an implicit lie because, although true on its face, it implies that someone said otherwise, which you know is untrue. As to left wing violence: https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/16/this-list-of-attacks-against-conservatives-is-mind-blowing/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/28/black-clad-antifa-attack-right-wing-demonstrators-in-berkeley/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9fa1f2a7719c https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/07/antifa-attacks-patriot-prayer-march-in-portland-or/

You couldn't get through the first line without being dishonest. The absurdity of your scapegoating claim aside, you intentionally said immigrants when you know the controversy is specific to illegal immigrants because using the accurate terminology hurts your side. Charlottesville is a dishonest example because you're trying to draw an equivalence between the rogue actions of one person in a fringe group condemned by virtually everyone on the right, and an organized group that intentionally incites violence on a regular basis that is often defended and rarely condemned by the mainstream left. Your claim about demeaning immigrants is also a lie. It is a fact that Mexican drug cartels, whose members are by definition gang members, and many of whom are murderers and rapists, traffic drugs and sex slaves across the unsecured border with great regularity. No one with a functional understanding of the English language and a shred of objectivity can claim that President Trump was declaring all illegals fall into that category, much less all Mexicans or immigrants. As usual, you have to mischaracterize because the truth hurts your position. You're really proving my point. Every single response you've had has been filled with mischaracterizations, half-truths, and flat out lies. If you were right you wouldn't have to do that. You could just tell the truth like I do.

This is what I'm talking about. The right doesn't demonize minorities. Rather, the left labels them as victims with conservative white males as their presumptive victimizers. When the conservative explains that these people are not victims and that he has not victimized them the left claims that is an attack on those minorities. It's blatantly dishonest. You claim conservatives are obsessed with minorities, but the truth is that the only reason conservatives are talking about these issues in the first place is because the left keeps bringing them up to exploit their perceived victim status for political gain. Conservatives simply want minorities to have the same rights everyone else has and leave them alone. The left wants to get up their ass and around the corner. As to political violence, I can think of at least a dozen instances of organized violent "protests" orchestrated by the left in the last 2 years alone, not to mention the widespread calls for political violence and harassment from leftist organizations and political leaders. You know about this but you make a dishonest representation because the truth is damaging to your side. The fact that your best counter is an incident from 23 years ago says it all. If you have to lie to make the case for your side, there's a good chance your side is wrong.

I believe the whole Democrat party is built on a foundation of lies, and the mainstream media is part of the Democrat party for all intents and purposes. I can scarcely recall witnessing, much less partaking in a political conversation with a lib where his argument didn't rely on falsehoods. I heard a lib the other day comparing Tea party protests to the violent destruction coming from the left. Anyone paying attention knows she's lying, but they don't care. The useful idiots believe it and repeat it, even though they know it's not true. The whole PC movement is about the denial and suppression of truths that are inconvenient to left wing causes. The mere acknowledgement of reality is seen as deplorable. Try stating publicly that false allegations of sexual abuse aren't terribly uncommon, that black people commit disproportionately more crime, or that Mexican cartels run drugs, guns, and kidnapped girls across the border. All these things are true, but the left doesn't care about truth. Hell, the left STILL won't admit to the left leaning bias in media and academia despite how blatantly and undeniably obvious it is. They say if you want to make a conservative mad tell him a lie. If you want to make a liberal mad tell him the truth. I always wonder why you have to lie if you actually think you're right.

I hadn't really thought about it that way, but it's basically saying "what are you whining about, you're only being accused of rape." I imagine it said in the same tone a feminist who is proud of being ashamed of her white privilege while simultaneously claiming victim status due to the hardships of having a vagina dismissively tells a guy that his problems don't matter because he's a white male.

I like your presence here. You make the discussion more interesting.

It couldn't hold out forever. Even walls fall down.

No one really. Kamala Harris would concern me a little. Even though she's a lightweight retard who says ridiculous things that should be automatic disqualifiers, she's got the bullied female angle, she may bring out the black vote, and she may motivate cucks who want to brag that they voted for a black woman.

God I hope this guy wins the nomination. Trump was somewhat handcuffed going against Hillary because if he went alpha dog on her he'd look like a bully. But he could bully the **** out of Booker and Booker can't cry about it lest he expose himself as the little bit©h that he is. It would be an absolute slaughter.

Wasn't that his job last time he was here?

I meant girls who are always single and guys who are incels. I know some 30+ year old male feminist virgins with very strong opinions about how men are supposed to behave with women.

This is purely anecdotal, but I've noticed the majority of the most vehement of the #believewomen crowd that I know are girls who are perpetually single and incels. Has anyone else noticed this trend?

!@#$ the will of the people. The so-called "people" want to force authoritarian rule upon their neighbors and feel they are oppressed because they are unable to do so. Their goal is to have a Federal government without constitutional restraints so that they may impose their will upon others. Their will is illegitimate. The imposition of one's will on another is the essence of evil.

I don't necessarily believe that Ford wanted this kept quiet. Maybe she did, but I'm not taking them at their word. They've proven they'll say or do anything to achieve their ends.

I think we should dismantle the country. Let the northeast and west coast secede and form their own confederations. Then they don't have to live under the oppression of being left alone, and the rest of us don't have to live under authoritarian rule. Everyone gets what they want.

I just wish these as$holes knew how much entertainment we were getting from them.

Sounds like a rebel without a clue.