Jump to content

strive_for_five_guy

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by strive_for_five_guy

  1. But if the Lambo gets you laid and the BMW never does, maybe the Lambo is worth it.
  2. Thanks for the link. The more I read about the LB prospects, I’m not convinced our solution for next season is in this year’s draft 🙁
  3. Am I wrong in thinking Simpson looks like way more of a playmaker than Edmunds ever was though? He looks like he’s out for blood from what I’ve seen of him.
  4. I kind of want to see the actual posters reading what they’ve written to each other 😇
  5. Simpson is the LB I want. Guy runs around the field like an animal and makes plays.
  6. Unless he wanted to identify moles w/in the organization or drive the price up for other players like the Chiefs.
  7. Sounds like Arizona & Denver may be waiting for the other to deal their guy first, could explain the hold-up in either deal yet: https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/10069916-report-cardinals-broncos-waiting-for-leverage-in-deandre-hopkins-jerry-jeudy-trade.amp.html
  8. What was your source for this being Pegula’s jet? Not the Pegula jet by my records….
  9. https://flightaware.com/live/flight/XSR960/history/20210609/2045Z/KBED/KBUF Landed in Buffalo earlier today. Wanted to meet D-Hop face-to-face before signing off on everything. 🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
  10. It’s been too long since I’ve had a Jim’s Stinger…🤤🤤🤤
  11. Isn’t the 3rd is going back to the Browns?
  12. Right, and the R2 DL success level holds through R4 draftees. Hence, if you are going to draft DL after R1, might as well wait until later R3 or R4, versus waste a R2 pick on DL. That R2 pick is better spent elsewhere.
  13. Looks like DL performance doesn’t really drop off between R2 through R4. In order words, unless you have a potential stud D-lineman, you shouldn’t really draft someone there until R3 or R4. On the other hand, starting LBs drop off pretty quickly after R3. Milano is somewhat a diamond in the rough. The data would indicate if we’re looking for Edmunds replacement in this year’’s draft, we’d be smart to fire on that target early (R1 or R2).
  14. I just don’t see the team spending a lot of assets on an older (albeit a HOFer) WR, trying to squeeze him into the current WR room, rather than look to draft a younger more affordable WR in the draft. Diggs has been great, but age will likely start to catch up to him in the next few years. Davis could be gone after this year. The team needs to start finding longer term WR weapons for Josh.
  15. With all the recent WR signings and upcoming draft, only way I see us in on a Hopkins trade would be if we’re shipping Gabe their way. And I don’t really see there being mutual interest in that, let alone taking on Hopkins salary.
  16. Between signing guys like Beasley and Brown for the late season push and then Harty and Sherfield in the offseason, it’s clear the team was not happy with the production of guys like McKenzie. Agree they need to find additional WR talent in the draft too.
×
×
  • Create New...