FWIW, Sal was on local Rochester radio while I was driving to work and his thoughts are that the Bills will:
1) Take Sammy Watkins at 9 if he is there
else
2) Take an OT if one they really like is still there at 9
else
3) Take Ebron at 9.
With a wildcard of trading up if they really REALLY love one of the OTs
Also said he would not be surprised if they get Watkins (or any WR in the 1st) that SJ13 gets cut during camp, and would catch on quickly on another team as a #2 or a #3.
To some, and from what I'm reading most in the clubs, that actually is considered rowdy.
I guess if you want to stand or yell you don't sit in the clubs. And if standing and yelling bothers you, stick to the clubs and out of the rest of the stadium.
I can only assume you mean the LA Clippers
She has the money (estimated at $2.9 billion). I doubt she would allow the Bills to suck for another 14 years. So why the hell not? I'm on board
He owns some common stock that he got when he sold his casino interests. He has no say in running the business anymore. No longer an issue.
However all of the other issues with The Donald are still in play.
He didn't. He just wanted them to stay in Buffalo. Now that he lives in Florida I'm not sure if he would want to invest a billion in the Bills. But I guess we will see.
Since he seems to value the QB situation greatly I see what you mean. Buffalo is in the "Maybe we have a QB" stage while Cleveland is in the "No !@#$ing way do we have a QB" stage.
But if the Brownies manage to get a good QB (draft or otherwise) I have the feeling you may be surprised either this season or the one after. Particularly if Pettine ends up being a solid head coach.
Yesterday I was thinking of getting 1 share for each of my kids as a novelty. But now that my blood alcohol level has returned to normal it seems silly.
Plus none of my kids are that high on EJ. If it was Spiller they would probably want a share
But all the articles I've seen forget to mention the biggest risk in buying these "stocks". That being Fantex itself folding.
I think he is taking into account not just last season, but the FA players lost and acquired.
I suspect when you get down to the bottom of the list a lot of the teams are very close and the order is not as meaningful.
If you ignore the numeric order and look just at his comments I can't find a lot of fault.
It absolutely is not when there are significant consequences on the line. It happens in business every single day. This isn't a 5rd grade "Jimmy likes Missy" gossip situation we are talking about.
Contracts do appear to be on the table, including the current one.
Think of it as he is taking out bust insurance.
I'm not sure what to think of this whole thing other than it seems to be a new and different form of long term gambling. Assuming that the "stock" would pay dividends and could be sold to others that is. Without dividends and the ability to sell your stock to others it is nothing more than a gimmick to make money.
It does seem like an almost criminal waste of money in a state that is already overburdened with taxes.
Because there is no such thing as an iron clad lease.
No. Not even a little.
I usually watch live until the Bills make their first pick and that's it. Most of the players they pick after the 1st I never heard of anyway (I don't follow college football at all) so I just read up on them all after the fact.
Congrats to your daughter!