dubs

well, I’ve never read a report that said the sabres won a game that they actually lost so I think your metaphor fails immediately.

This is an amazing article from April. I recall CNN and NBC covering it and an article in the Times also, not. https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437719-ukrainian-to-us-prosecutors-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats%3famp

what exactly did he say? Where did you hear about it? Let me save you the time: you don’t know. You heard it from the MSM/Democrats. god you’re a fool.

this cuts to the heart of the problems in our country. As much as I despise the political establishment and the media, at the very least their motivations are understood. Greed, power, wealth. the public is another story and I don’t think there’s one explanation. Some people are just so entrenched on their side. Some people can’t fathom the implications of a broken system infested with corrupt people. Some just believe the MSM because it’s all they know or see. Some live in bubbles that reinforce their worldview. Any many are just either lazy or too busy to really dig in. We also have the issue of government schools and the failure there. All in all, this country is a mess.

IMO - this is everything. It’s actually what Trump was talking about with the Ukraine, not Biden. But you’d have to have taken 2 minutes to read the transcript to know that, which many obviously have not. IIRC as well, some of the forensic evidence that Crowdstrike did supply actually refuted the notion that an overseas hack from Russia could have been possible. Something about download or upload speeds or something, I can’t recall exactly. Point is, if anyone truly wants to find out what happened and let the evidence lead us where it may (pro/anti trump, pro/anti Dems) you’d want to let the authorities examine the ground zero piece of evidence and make the findings available to the public. it’s like a plane crash happening and Boeing or Delta saying the plane was shot out of the sky by a Russian missile and then only allowing Boeing or Delta to investigate it!

when your mom told you daily that she was going to kill you, did you call 911 each day because you took her words literally? its clear trump was talking about this ridiculous topic as phony. The notion that somehow he’s violating a word (not a clause mind you, a singular word) in the constitution or doing anything remotely untoward is patently ridiculous.

if trump is trying to do corruption like that, he’s definitely doing it wrong. Most people don’t do corruption wide out in the open for what you are asserting amounts to be a little more than a cup of coffee in value relative to his worth.

I think DR is pointing out the obvious hypocrisy in people not having any issues with politicians using fake foundations to peddle influence and calling constitutional crisis with a president holding a summit at one of his properties at cost (in other words, not making any profit). One is clearly intended to enrich the politicians and their families and friends in an significant way. We’re talking dynastic wealth being generated and it being done in a completely secret way. The other is not making a single dollar for the president and being done wide out in the open. so, yeah....I get what DR is saying.

Liberals, so funny. “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States; and no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” Excerpt From The United States Constitution United States https://books.apple.com/us/book/the-united-states-constitution/id498472800 This material may be protected by copyright.

What that just one of those weird camera angles where it looks like the ball was right next to the receiver but in reality it was not? A depth perception thing or something? I don’t know, otherwise that was a terrible effort.

1: a usually rectangular-shaped bag (as of paper, burlap, or canvas) 2: the amount contained in a sackespecially : a fixed amount of a commodity used as a unit of measure 3a: a woman's loose-fitting dress b: a short usually loose-fitting coat for women and children c: SACQUE sense 2 4: DISMISSALgave him the sack 5a: HAMMOCK, BUNK b: BED 6: a base in baseball 7: an instance of sacking the quarterback in football

Hah! I love the OP and this thread! Go Bills and Go KGun! ?

Allen said it in his press conference. At this point they are playing complementary football and haven’t needed him to throw the ball 40+ times. Prior to this week (not sure how that stat looked after today) the Bills have also passed the ball second most in the league in situations where it’s not an obvious pass or run (ie trying to come from behind or icing the game). So it’s not like they are just playing run run pass like years past. That being said, I do think at some point we’re going to have to see him dominate a game from start to finish and put up big numbers in the air. But for now, I’m happy with the wins!

hah. So true. I was predicting between 6 and 12 wins this year. Feeling good about that prediction still, imma stick with it.

that’s weird. The pats have zero losses and the bills have 1 loss. And there are three teams with 2 losses including the Colts. So how are the colts the second best and it’s not debatable? ?

the colts looks very good. No doubt. It’s just a very debatable point, so saying it’s not debatable is a terrible take. saying, the colts might be the second best team in the AFC is more reasonable and defendable.

terrible take and that’s not debatable

you don’t understand risk/return very well I didn’t really like it either, but the only way Miami comes back if a TO there.

And no more TOs for the Dolphins down two scores with less than 4 minutes left.

I get the move there, but would have liked to see a few throws on this drive.

Is Ed Oliver Hurt. I know he’s not playing well, but I didn’t even see him in the game on that last series, in an obvious passing situation.

Bye week nap?

If withholding US taxpayer money from gifting it to a foreign country until that foreign country helps get to the truth of what happened in the 2016 election is quid pro quo, then sign me up all day every day!!! essentially the communists/socialists/globalists are upset that Trump is trying to find the potentially most important piece of evidence in what they asserted was the absolute most important issue in the history of the country and that’s the election “interference”. Strange times indeed.

Is there an impeachment going on!? That’s what I’m talking about. There’s an inquiry, but not any actual impeachment proceedings. we should be more careful about the terminology we use. Everyone, not just the socialists/globalists/communists.

There are so many words/phrases that get purposely misused to shape the public’s view in favor of a political agenda. Would be great to have a list of those in question and discuss. Here’s a few: Public School: lets call this what it is, Government Schools Democracy: the United States is not a democracy, it’s a Constitutional Republic. We use the democratic process to elect, but we are not a pure democracy. Liberals = Democrat: Classic liberalism looks nothing like the current democrat party. They much more closely resemble socialists or communists. They need to be called what they are. “Elites”: I know this is used as a pejorative a lot, but the people who are elected to government office are certainly not elite. Government employees or politician is more like it. Public Service: if I hear another politician claim they’ve dedicated their life to public service it’ll be too soon. This gives some impression of sacrifice. These career politicians enrich themselves and do little to help the public.