-
Posts
49,631 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by boyst
-
I get what you're saying but the reality is he is doing it as a gross reaction too the liberal trolls who have been here for over a decade and ran many of the sites best posters out of here. Simply put I think if you want to be in this dungeon and discuss politics you should have to engage in football talk as this is a football message report first. D-bags like those who are doing this bump don't post in the football threads, they have no actual use on this board other than the control the politics through their non-stop trolling. Some of them are even thoughts, or worse yet second profiles by others. On something like 25 years here I've seen a lot of bull#### but the leftist trolling on this side it's pathetic. And it's gotten worse because the right side is not doing it to counter it. This list of who must be banned but will never happen: @Homelander @Trump_is_Mentally_fit @The Frankish Reich And prob more Roundy, section, other lefties will engage in some discussion but don't just troll ppp all day. The only troll sometimes.
-
I get what you're trying to say. And I am hardly the most eloquent person. My manner of speaking and being eloquent is akin to a rhinoceros doing ballet.... On meth. I think part of what you're saying can be wrapped up a little bit by saying Josh was affected by the Patriots game and as a result had the Falcons game. Josh was frustrated with the lack of separation by the wide receivers in the patriots, having to make gutsy throws and poor decisions to try to force something. I think because of this he went in with the mindset of less optimism confidence and to the layman look like he gave up. I think he was just lost and if anyone on this team can fix it he's on the top five of that list.
-
Coleman's only route to success long-term in the NFL is going to be playing big slot. I'm going to pound this table until I break it through, I'm banned for spamming, or I die. With the way the bills are playing right now there's a good chance I'll die from a heart attack. Coleman can't get open against cornerbacks. Shakir isn't finding success this reason and he may heat up. In the meantime we have Dalton Kincaid who was just not a good enough receiver lining up a tight end and getting covered adequately by linebackers and safeties. If we put Coleman in the big slot or on the field with Kincaid both in the interior positions this creates a mismatch problem that seems must adjust to by leveraging inside contain. Should we get Palmer back and have him on the outside he will have to be men on man and we all depend on him to beat his man. That's a big ask for him though possible, same with Gabe Davis, same with Curtis Samuel. However if we had a true number one on the outside with those guys and James Cook in the backfield it would be very hard for a defensive balance against us because Coleman is going to have a cornerback playing him at big slot and that is a little bit of an advantage for Coleman to body that corner leveraging the middle of the field. Gosh I'm typing a lot.... But the idea of bunching our formations together will work against a lot of these teams that we play and would have done well against the Falcons and their small defenders. Because we could switch tight ends or pull Shakir to replace with Knox and double tight end. We could also pull Kincaid for Hawes and power run. It makes me sick that Joe Brady can't get an identity with all of the talent. Simply decide what you're going to do and run it over and over and over and over again The only time I will say anything about being with his attitude about the wide receiver. Him calling up and chastising the radio announcers did not sit well with me this is either because he has a bad read on the talent of wide receiver as a position or we were grossly let down by what our front office judged the talent to be of guys like Curtis Samuel, keon Coleman, and Joshua Palmer.
-
SNF: Detroit @ Kansas City (no Bills stuff in this thread please)
boyst replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
The penalty can be called after the play if the referees arms got Frozen by alaso being thrown around them and paralyzed by Superman's death race there, and then he couldn't throw the flag on time. It is an illegal formation play which is a penalty before the snap which must occurred during the play itself as it takes action an illegal formation cannot be before the ball is set, subtle but true So you could have all your guys line up anyway you want them but it will not matter until you set the ball. At that point nobody can move except for one person on offense in a parallel line to the line of scrimmage. That person cannot be on the line of scrimmage, nor can they have both of their hands under Center as the rule was originally written. If such an infringement of that rule exists the play is to be blown dead or the play immediately nullified with whistles at the execution of the the snap of the ball. It's very nuanced and technical and a football 3001 kind of thing but it's not some super expert level of knowledge although it is remarkable how few people understand this simple rule It's a funny situation how people don't understand the nuance of the rules.A pre snap penalty is a pre snap penalty. You either call it or you don't at the snap, it's amateur to wait until after the play is blown dead especially from a touchdown -
Plausible X/#1 receiver trade candidates — are there any?
boyst replied to dave mcbride's topic in The Stadium Wall
I don't mind Meyers because of forward thinking. he's a bit overpriced, though. my thought with the game - mind you i was 2 years early - was that power running is going to make a comeback with defenses getting lighter and faster. IMO the league will continue to go toward bodies on bodies to beat the speed and take advantage of the smaller guys. this will be taken advantage of with larger slots like Myers who is taller than heavier (6'2, 190ish). Coleman is 6'3, 215 and I want him in the big slot role. Even if that means double slots or taking Shakir off the field from time to time. Shakir may only have 2-3 years left on his body the way he plays and taking it across the middle. anyway, that's why I would be ok with Myers as long as we got someone else. It comes down to a numbers game and making a scheme work. we can assume 1 of 2 things 1) we see Cook on the field more because the HC wants it so 2) we don't see Cook on the field more because we just don't. If that means we go to having a bigger slot on the field like Myers to block for Cook than so be it - if scenario 1 becomes true. If that means we have a bigger slot on 3rd down for short yardage situations because Cook isn't on the field than scenario 2 makes it ok. I'd not mind Meyers if we also got a Olave or someone. -
Plausible X/#1 receiver trade candidates — are there any?
boyst replied to dave mcbride's topic in The Stadium Wall
CB+WR+Davis 1000% up for letting Coleman go find a new home. I'd even be up for sending someone to Carolina for Tetirlltoroeoeoio the guy who's name I can't pronounce. -
For the frustration of many the reality was he helped. YPG passing, YPP passing... All went up when he was on the field.
- 76 replies
-
- 14
-
-
-
-
-
Plausible X/#1 receiver trade candidates — are there any?
boyst replied to dave mcbride's topic in The Stadium Wall
That becomes the issue because then it's a numbers game. Throwing 2 mediocre wide receivers on the roster to elevate the position group doesn't raise the bar on the field like we needed to do We need to find a way to get a top 30 receiver on the outside will elevate the game put us in a position to have a stronger on-field presence. We don't want to take cook off the field, we don't want to take Kincaid off the field, so we have three other positions available to play with that starts to cause trouble. I suppose knocks and Shakir are somewhat interchangeable for down and distance. One of the additions would be a top end wide receiver, the trade Target. But then we have to leave room for the number two number three guy, whether that's Coleman, Palmer, or creating a different lineup and going heavy with someone the likes of Jackson Hawes. As much as I want to improve our wide receiver unit at any cost I don't want to do it with a middling guy who doesn't give us increased talent and only creates a position to fill. I have high standards in hopes for this and Christian Olave is about the floor of my ceiling. Garrett Wilson would be a fever dream, Jacoby Myers might be a little bit better than Olave. But regardless it is it bad situation we put ourselves in. -
Plausible X/#1 receiver trade candidates — are there any?
boyst replied to dave mcbride's topic in The Stadium Wall
i wonder what it was like to be a Falcons fans when Peerless Price went to play for them? or Alvin Harper to the Bucs? I remember Langston Walker Hype, and Terrel Owens hype here... but are we in denial to think Amani Cooper or Beasley 2.0 was different? -
Plausible X/#1 receiver trade candidates — are there any?
boyst replied to dave mcbride's topic in The Stadium Wall
We gotta revert to reverse psychology at this point. Having it shoved in his face isn't gonna work and make someone else overpay for him. Or worse yet, us overpay for him. -
What’s going on with Chiefs starting rookie LT Simmons
boyst replied to Big Blitz's topic in The Stadium Wall
Two things of note. One of the tweets says to forget he's protecting the best quarterback in the league. That's easy to do because that's bull####. And most importantly I really hope he is okay and everything works out because this is scary sounding. -
Hawes has been that good + after that big catch it was obvious that teams did not expect him to run like that. Hawes is a force and needs to be used in packages with 6OL + Hawes + Gilliam to power run. and to make it more about Kincaid and the overall dynamic. As i have been saying we are blessed with 3 very good TEs each with a different skillset. the problem is the Kyle Pitts mistake, as i think of it. Pitts is a good pass catching tight end but teams don't cover him like a TE. they cover him like a slot so he can't be productive. if he had to beat LB's he'd win. it today's NFL good LB's can still cover Kincaid and Pitts, and most safeties, can too without being bodied. so we have a TE who isn't fast enough or good enough hands to be a WR being labeled a TE for that very reason. that's why i like Knox as a TE more. he can block, he can catch as well as the average TE, and he can do the balance of work required. Hawes may have more talent than we realize catching and we have no idea how good his routes are or how good he is at exploiting open zones or finding seams.
-
I did not pick the chiefs. i don't think. i think i went with someone else because i could see the Chiefs being arrogant, cocky, and sleep walking. their defense isn't alive yet.
-
Ricky Scoops? Wtf is that and why do we care? ToiletWaterCheese on Twitter just said George Seiffert is at Del Taco on the way to OP, btw.
- 222 replies
-
- 13
-
-
-
Plausible X/#1 receiver trade candidates — are there any?
boyst replied to dave mcbride's topic in The Stadium Wall
Yeah the office was a bit wild this morning. You know that smelling salt in the office vibe gets going and all those purchase orders, and delivery notes... That whole erp system had no chance against us. We conquered every ***** spreadsheet you could find. -
Plausible X/#1 receiver trade candidates — are there any?
boyst replied to dave mcbride's topic in The Stadium Wall
Well, we were passing smelling salter out this morning at work. -
Yeah it's kind of funny how that works in the mind isn't it? I could see us winning every single game remaining but could never ever conceive us losing every single game remaining? It just, well, it's just funny.
-
Would you want to see Josh play hardball with the organization?
boyst replied to Another Fan's topic in The Stadium Wall
These guys are just doing their job. Sure they get attached and drink the Kool-Aid for the corporation they work for but the end of the day it's still just a job to them punching in and punching out If these guys get the chance to play with another team later on and think they can get the money or the professional accolades they want then why the hell wouldn't they? I'm going to retire in 10 years, no joke. If my company came to me and said I could work part-time remote doing my same job for half the money I make I would do it. It's just a job to them just like our jobs are to us.
