Jump to content

boyst

Community Member
  • Posts

    48,104
  • Joined

Everything posted by boyst

  1. Let's play a game: 1) NFL staff kept him on the roster all year: fact 2) they saw him as disciplined: unknown 3) they saw he was developmental: unknown (likely.... obviously true) 4) they wouldn't have put him on the roster: unknown (see Jaquan Johnson and Bobby Hart). We do not know what the coaches thought. Perhaps because he was deemed coachable he was deemed worthwhile as a project. We don't know what they think. Zoomers don't understand empirical fact anymore. It's weird. In preseason I watched him. Some woman near us in Carolina was friends with him in college so I paid attention and rewatched some pre season games when I had nothing else to do in September.
  2. Opinions vary
  3. I like that you use that word patience. I think that sums up what I did not see last year, and it might be confusing to some. His hustle to the ball was genuine, but it seemed like he broke out of assignments, lost discipline on the overall scheme, and just played more like a backyard style ball that an actual piece of this defense. Is built to be a symbiotic unit. As strong as their weakest link in every sense of the term. Losing Gap integrity, tell Richard responsibility, and the vision needed to play middle linebacker in this defense is very costly. This is something that people jumped all over Edmunds about but he is truly an athletic freak that allowed him to recover with not just his size but his quickness to react. The sharper I always criticized that he was too late to react or recognize the place. Anyway, time will tell. And I hope I'm wrong. It's not like seeing preseason action of this guy last year is 100% the story but I am a pessimist in this regard
  4. rule 34 must be imposed.
  5. oh i get it but the uuntrained eye did not like milano and still swooned over edmunds who was routinely lost. i wish i'd have kept the comment marked when i dared say milano was going to outplay edmunds and more valuable and important than edmunds. i was raked over coals. i don't buy into a lot of preseason reports. he did not have a good preseason by my untrained eye. making plays as he did last preseason doesn't mean he was doing his assignemnts and playing well. he didn't look impressive last year
  6. maybe i mispoke. that dotson couldn't hold his own weight last year and was not-so-good isn't a good indicator of what spector was - and i don't believe a 7th round player can have that much breakthrough talent in year two at a position like mlb. milano was an entirely different player. i remember after edmunds rookie year getting blasted that milano was going to be the better player by a mile even though edmunds and his position was more important at his position on the defense.
  7. He just didn't move my needle. 🤷🏼‍♂️ That he couldn't handle it, and Spector didn't find time there was telling. But by those points in the game/season we were struggling. I forgot who else was out for those games. Nah, I know defense.
  8. i didn't think so. he was making plays but while he passed the eye test he didn't pass the sniff test. he didn't seem to be diagnosing very fast, making the initial first steps, reads and routes. he was a man amongst midgets on scout team.
  9. Spector ain't it. He looked lost last year in PS. I hope I'm wrong. Dotson is solid, has potential for a stop gap at the least but is capable of starting. Klein is capable of starting, smart, and able to mesh with the defense. Bernard ia a wildcard The rookie dude starting this year terrified me.
  10. Whole house generators are worth it. They're fairly affordable, compared to years past.
  11. Reminds me of Hughes ability when he left Buffalo Wish we kept him
  12. I remember this. Pepperidge farm remembers, too
  13. Launch all influencers to the moon.
  14. ...but on this point, is he wrong? No.
  15. That is something I've noticed, too. Barkley keeps getting written down. The only QB we have had as a backup who I wanted to keep was Trubisky.
  16. Not what I said either. On a case by case basis to judge a statement made by someone, in this case Scott, you must analyze the merit.
  17. ... On a case by case basis. Then you say "all teams." 🤔
  18. On a case by case basis that should not be held true. Further there is reason for doom. After the 2nd playoff loss in Houston there have been more questions than answers from this team.
  19. If that's a hammy they need better trainers. Yikes. That ankle to hamstring is so easy to pre hab
  20. Great minds! Ha. I've seen 3 rupture in person. 1 guy twice in 16 months. Both sides. It looks like immeasurable pain.
  21. If it was Achilles a lot lot lot lot lot lot more pain
  22. There's one thing that I do trust McDermott on, and that is defensive back talent. So I'm sure ist justified
  23. Yeah that list is f***** up
  24. I ain't wasting clicks on this. Who was 3 and 4? Without looking 1) Reid/mahomes 2) burrow/coach I can mix the top 5 rounded up with Tua/McDaniel because Tua can be good and McDaniel is a good coordinator Hurts and his coach because they win Stafford and mcvay because they won Outside of that I like cousins and his coach, and San fran with whoever they play.
×
×
  • Create New...