Mr. WEO
Community Member-
Posts
47,565 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mr. WEO
-
What would be considered an "outright lie" as opposed to a regular straight up type of lie in this case? Also, if her lawyer is manufacturing false evidence and submits it to the court as genuine, he is committing fraud against the court.
-
The consequence is that it would tank his lawsuit in court.
-
It would be discoverable. Obviously Araiza's (new) lawyer would find out what's on there. It would an incredibly weak bluff if plaintiff's is lying about its contents. It's a cornerstone of his case. A guy isn't going to base a lawsuit on an easily disproven piece of evidence's existence .
-
Do you think it's likely, or even possible, that plaintiff's lawyer would lie about the contents of the taped call in his submission of the suit? Why would he commit such an easily exposed lie?
-
Or just start a new "acquisition corporation" to sucker in more investor cash.
-
He knew a month ago. Maybe he's shook up because the public heard this story and reacted to them knowing a month ago? What pat are you claiming is inaccurate? She went to the cops, then the hospital then the cops had her make a pretext call and they taped it. You think the plaintiff will withdraw the suit now that he's been cut?? If that was true, why did he give the Bills a heads out the suit a month ago, knowing there was a strong possibility the outcome of that was Araiza getting cut? The suit was likely filed to prompt the SDPD, SDC DA to move the criminal case along after a lot of foot dragging.
-
Yeah, it’s real good for Matt. Lol. That’s such a bad lie.
-
The criminal case began the day after the alleged rape. 9 days later the cops were taking a pretext call to Araiza. The Bills firing was inevitable. The Bills knew a civil suit was coming weeks ago. Their “thorough investigation” would have made them aware of many of the details of the suit. Yet the still did nothing, other than cut last year’s punter. Then, after a massive and predictable PR disaster follows once the public is aware of what the Bills already knew about this whole thing, and with no new info….they cut him. Real class.
-
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
The plaintiffs lawyer says the Bill have not asked to speak to her. He contacted THEM weeks ago to give them a heads up that his client was filing a suit against Araiza. If he’s looking for big money, why would he take the chance that the Bills would cut him after hearing this? -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
You are handling it correctly. The alternative is that everyone will feel compelled to start a new thread about what HE/SHE just learned about this case, and wanted to let us all know. The whole first thread list page would be about a rookie Punter nope -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
Name any team where, after their stalwart Punter was cut, their collective psyche and chemistry were damaged.. -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
It’s been reported everywhere (just read it in NYT) and her lawyer is saying so. -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
Again, the alleged victim didn’t refuse to speak with the Bills. The Bills never asked to speak with her, -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
Then the Bills should say they did an incomplete investigation -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
Where do I say that the Bills should ask the lawyer to do their investigation lol wtf? Simply interview the plaintiff. -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
So they should have instead said “our investigation was limited to only the counterclaims of Matt Araiza and what we could find out second hand from others”. Instead, they said it was “thorough”. That’s obviously a lie. And ridiculous. -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
She had already spoken publicly about her ordeal, plus the full details of her claim were known in the lawsuit. Why wouldn’t the lawyer let the Bills reach out to her, with the lawyer present? -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
Than it is anything but a thorough investigation -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
Lol you’re joking right? Her lawyer contacted the Bills a month ago. -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
The Bills “thorough investigation” didn’t include interviewing the victim. Clown show -
The scene at a Charlotte Bills Bar 4 hours before the game!
Mr. WEO replied to StHustle's topic in The Stadium Wall
Doc? -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
3/4 of this thread is like this -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
You said this more than once last night and others corrected you over an over, yet here you are again with this. You're wrong. -
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
Mr. WEO replied to bill8164's topic in Off the Wall
dude, wtf: hope he got willing oral??...this is getting creepy. he's not your "Mat", he's a rookie Punter on a football team.
