
Mr. WEO
Community Member-
Posts
46,856 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mr. WEO
-
Buffalo Bills’ Jordan Poyer named best safety in NFL
Mr. WEO replied to SlimShady'sSpaceForce's topic in The Stadium Wall
Don't know who "Nick Wojton" is, nor do I read "Touchdown Wire", but it's odd that, 6 months after Poyer put up these number, he writes an article touting him as #1. -
Only do the upper decker when you absolutely have to...
-
2022 USFL Championship, Stars vs Stallions, Fox 7:30p ET
Mr. WEO replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Stadium Wall
The stands are nearly empty. -
2022 USFL Championship, Stars vs Stallions, Fox 7:30p ET
Mr. WEO replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Stadium Wall
They won't buy a ticket to see their team play, but they will lay out for a Jersey? -
Hyde & Poyer via Cover 1 with preface from Belichek
Mr. WEO replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall
He went into tachyclappia -
Hyde & Poyer via Cover 1 with preface from Belichek
Mr. WEO replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall
plus Kelce called out the play. twice. -
2022 USFL Championship, Stars vs Stallions, Fox 7:30p ET
Mr. WEO replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Stadium Wall
week 10: 4 games, 1.4 million viewers total.... -
Article - Von Miller already making his presence felt
Mr. WEO replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall
whoosh -
Locked on Bills Podcast: A Case for Tremaine Edmunds
Mr. WEO replied to TC in St. Louis's topic in The Stadium Wall
Duke -
I didn’t say there wasn’t a loophole. I said a 6 game suspension is a 6 game suspension, not a “suspended sentence”. You said a loophole would include “nonsuspension”. it would make no sense to have a conditional suspension. He will be suspended based on what he has done up to this point. If he commits further acts he will be suspended again.
-
AP's daddy didn't prepare him for hitting grownups...
-
Locked on Bills Podcast: A Case for Tremaine Edmunds
Mr. WEO replied to TC in St. Louis's topic in The Stadium Wall
make it stop... if it takes this many years and this many threads to decide whether a guy is worth pay...he probably isn't -
you've come to the right place...
-
Scroll up to see the post I was responding to. It wasn't yours. I'm not sure what you are talking about now: the fact that the whole contract was guaranteed or that the guarantee amount is 230 million. If they offered him a 150 million a 50 million a year for 3 years all guaranteed, would that be a big deal? If they offered him a 10 year contact at 500 million (Mahomes money) and 200 million guaranteed, would that be better? What the owners "don't care about" is that the Browns are paying this one season wonder 230 million all up front. It's not going to change how most of them enter negotiations with their franchise QBs.
-
lol..10 years??!. The NFL total revenue in 2009 was 8 billion. It doubled in 10 years. For most owners, yeah, it's still a nonstarter---it doesn't "force teams" to do anything. How good is your memory? It was only 4 years ago that Kirk Cousins singed the first NFL "fully guaranteed contract". How many fully backed contracts were demanded after him? And Herbert will command at least 50 million a year. They will want to lock him up for 6-7 years, at least. Josh and Rodgers had 2/3 of their money guaranteed. That's 200+ million the Chargers will have to escrow---without a fully guaranteed contract..... Anyway, back to the original point: to suggest that the owners are pissed off and want to punish the Browns over this is really ridiculous. There is so much money coming in they aren't losing sleep over this. What they did was stupid, not trend setting. They also singed and kept Hue Jackson...
-
you don't say....
-
Again, at some point, some owner was going to to it--it has to be the natural progression of how contracts are negotiated and how teams will compete with each other. Why would the owners want to "punish" another for being the first? History shows us that NFL owners are very averse to "punishing" each other. This would be maybe reason 100 on a list of 100 reasons owners would seek retribution.
-
why can't we just talk about Tremaine Edmunds?
-
lol, why would they count a year where he refused to play? come on Again, there was nothing preventing them from being the first (someone was going to be, no?). Doesn't mean it will open the floodgates for more---if it does, then clearly the owners don't mind. They could all easily agree not to in the future, amongst themselves.
-
Those expectations haven't been met in 14 years. Herman was the only bright spot for that program for all those years. It's a program that exited the national championship discussion a while ago. Sark had their first losing record in their last 5 seasons.