Mr. WEO

I know you people love your conspiracies---just answer the question. And another: Did they ask the white guys if they were "on board with the NFL" on any matters?

Why can't Pegula do that right now...you know, without the rich Canadians buying Bills home tickets?

Drive him out of town? Where do fans appreciate sloppy QB play? Cleveland is tied up with Watson for years...

Anyone who doesn't appreciate or complains about our wonderful nation's current rail system....CAN GO BACK TO JAPAN!!!!

You misread it then. He was asked, in essence, to not discuss publicly how the NFL is handling matters of race (he's a black reporter, to remind you). This is several years after he voiced his initial concerns and, he claims, nothing was done. He said he would not stop asking the questions. That alone is why they didn't renew. So he sued them. Whether the suit has merit is for others to decide, not you and I. lol there you go! What is this conspiracy? He asked them 2 years ago.

There's nothing about Pegula's NFL revenue that puts the Bills at a "competitive disadvantage". The premise is false.

I mean, I said it was awesome...

Josh needs more weapons

They already have one...

A few Toronto millionaires arriving in "luxury rail cars". somehow brings in tons more money for Billionaire Pegula? lol, this is awesome. Because it's insanely expensive and only the Northeast corridor would have any chance to make money---and could never cover its costs. You need a string of large cities all within 2 hundred miles or less from each other to be linked by such a rail system (Washington to Boston--Northeast corridor for Amtrak). Flying is faster, sometimes cheaper, over vast distances. Who wants to take a train, even a fast one, across country or from NY to Fla for instance?

So Diggs was the only open receiver that night? yeah that makes no sense...draft another guy to get 4 targets

by that logic, so were all receivers not named Digs.

I'm with you on this one. NFLPA predictably jumped on this.

lol "best coach in football". In how many years??

you should really read the complaint.

2 dudes without a care in the world

Allen threw 51 passes of 20+ yards out of 567 attempts. This "Josh can't throw the short pass" take just won't die.

lol disappears? he played 94% of the Offense snaps. Allen wasn't looking at anybody but a well covered Diggs all day.

That's the basis of his suit. You've stumbled onto it.

before they let you go, did they come to you and ask if you would be a team player by limiting the things you say in public about the company? I’m getting a pretty good idea of which criteria of theirs you did not meet to be hired full time….

this sums it up

He alleges they decided not to resign him only after asking him if he was in alignment with the NFL. His agent is listed as the person the VP told the reassurance about his renewal previously. Certainly doesn’t sound like it just dawned them that they didn’t want him anymore…or that they secretly hated him and were just messing with him when they initially told him not to worry. That makes zero sense. it’s clear you don’t understand that

The suit doesn't allege he asked for or was turned down for "a senior management position". So, no. One minute it's raining...the next minute it's not----you're right!! I can't tell if you are pretending not to understand the lawsuit or you really can't figure out that sequence of events. I'm not saying he wins the suit, but I'm pretty sure that NFL Media's law team will not tell VP's and other management to say what you suggested above while being deposed. They would get torn up. And he asked Goodell mostly because he's the Commissioner and the public face of the League. Your claim that he is not involved in the hiring of any staff--literally has "no say" how. NFL Media is run is....pretty funny--but exactly what I would expect you would say/believe.

88% of Davis's catches were for 1st downs or TDs.

They say they can't think of "a reason" why they would not renew. He asks Goodell a question he asked a year ago. This prompts the same VP who told asked him if he wanted an expanded role in his next contract to now ask if he "was in alignment with the NFL" (wink wink). He restates his concerns and beliefs. He is soon notified that they weren't renewing---i.e. they found a reason to contradict their previous reassurance about his contract. Does that make it more clear for you? No?