prissythecat

There have been a number of analysis done on defer vs receive. The below analysis says that receiving the ball in the 2nd half results in an extra point on average plus a 12% chance of "stealing" a possession. https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/analysis/opening-kickoff-receive-or-defer/#:~:text=Deciding whether to receive or,of games on the margins.&text=A lot of factors play,half when given the chance.

He still isn't free . I recall seeing that the case goes back to the District first and then based on what happens there (ie does the DA want to re try), he may be free.

Luckily , I tend not to put myself in a situations like Cardell who went after Smith and then rammed his car . Any reasonable person would have just called the police to report the accident rather than try to take the matter into their own hands where the outcome would quickly go bad which it did.

Yes. He is accurate when the receiver is wide open like they were in Alabama 😛

yup. and there are over a thousand other cases in louisiana right now that have this split verdict problem.

Now I am going to ask you if you read the story. The supreme court vacated the conviction because its a split verdict... Its not because of the individual merits of the case. But he didn't though... The supreme court threw it out because its a split verdict--a backwards rule in louisiana that they ruled violates the sixth amendment. Its now up to the New Orleans prosecutor to decide if he wants to try this again.

So in a hypothetical self defense situation it’s ok to unload a whole clip even if someone was already down because of fear?

Lol . I had to have read it to get the details on the bullets. Didn’t Hayes chase down Smith after the accident ? Also, a lot of this is he said she said because although Smith had a gun, it was still in his car untouched?

eight bullets into smith and another two into his wife is self defense?

Pot meet kettle?

Lots of Steelers fans wanted to see Mason Rudolph put in during the playoff game on Sunday lol.

For the one game sure, but as the justification for Lurie parting ways?

The whole notion of losing the locker room seemed silly. A number of articles mention the struggle with selection of the coaching assistants as a major conflict.

Are we sure the fumble rate is computed accurately ? I learned a few weeks back on this board that a fumble only happens if ball hits ground.

More like coach of the decade. 3 playoff wins in 10 years (no Superbowl appearances as well )despite having one of the more talented rosters in AFC during the period

Pissing off players in one game is not a sufficient reason to fire a coach. And tbh , Hurts was awful in the game so its not as if they benched someone who was performing at a high level. It seems that the reason may be that they see the deterioriation /mishandling of the team's ostensible franchise quarterback was a compelling reason to start afresh.

EJ may make a good coach. Often times good coaches were mediocre players 😛

I'm cool with that clarification. Passing is the way to go if a team wants to go far

How is your response relevant? The post I was responding to claims that smash mouth football always loses to pass heavy offenses. It clearly doesn't

Lol. What kind of football does Cleveland play? How about LA Rams?

More insight and less incite ?

Wow what a beat down

Wow. This may be over before the end of first half if Steelers don’t respond

The Ravens certainly do have a better running attack than the Colts .