bobobonators

Dude, i'm not assuming anything, i'm just going off of what HE said himself. And it's not as if he was a rookie QB taking every snap of every game and he was in over his head..he was a rookie on the PRACTICE SQUAD, AND STILL IN OVER HIS HEAD. If you can't figure out how important that distinction is, then there is no hope. I don't dislike Brohm dude...but please, don't sit there and tell me how Brohm even BEGINS to compare to Bradford in terms of talent or their collegiate careers (which is all we can go by since Brohm had done 0 in the nfl thus far).

Alphadawg..Brohm said himself he was in over his head in Green Bay..i didn't say that, HE DID. You can go find the quote somewhere.

I'm a Rutgers alum and watch every rutgers game. Drafting Davis at 9 (who's probably better suited for Guard in the NFL) would be insane. Bulaga at 9? Joke. Trent Williams at 9? Joke. I'm intrigued by Campbell, but only saw him play once...Okung to me, wouuld be the only premier talent for us to draft at 9..but he won't be there. So unless you plan to trade down, are you really going to draft a LT in the first?

Better tools? how so? Not height...not size...really not arm strength. How about mentally? Brohm has already shown to be in a bit over his head in the nfl...Bradford almost matched Brohm's entire collegiate numbers in his Junior year alone..It's amazing how quickly people forget things.

LOL. ok. Tell me, which LT is worth the 9th pick in the draft in this year's draft? Give me a name.

I agree with your overall point, but imo, this franchise needs to stop d*cking around with the QB position and make a move for a premier talent and stop trying to find that 3rd/4th round stud that everyone passed up. At 9, there's a somewhat decent chance that either Bradford or Clausen will be there. If one of them is, we can't pass it up. (imo)

if Bradford is there at 9...it would be a complete BLUNDER not to draft him. This is a QB that would've gone first overall if he hadn't gotten injured.

you'll be back.

doesn't wisconsin run a 4-3? the game i saw, schofield was an OLB, but dont recall it being a 3-4..i know he plays DE as well.

see my sig

holy **** dude. talk about looking into things..

yes, he/she was joking.

i would take Fewell over Frazier

It's YOU'RE...lmao..sorry, i couldn't resist. All kidding aside, I don't care! (all in good fun).

Bradford, thank you very much.

Ya, i'm sure Ravens fans were really complaining about their inability to develop a QB after they won the super bowl. Give me a break. If anything, Billick has at least the ability and mental capacity to put together a staff, and get the f*ck out of the way when it's working properly...something we can't even do. Why not discredit Dungy too for winning the super bowl with Manning. "hey manning, go out and play..i'll just stand here with this headset on." Same thing for BB and Brady. Your logic is foolish, and quite frankly, you're making yourself look like a moron.

wow dude, you may just be a moron. hopefully your other 2000+ posts provide a bit more mental stimulation.

to say that the defense carried the ravens to that super bowl is ovbiously an understatement...but don't simply discredit Billick. Fact is, he was the head coach of a champion. I want that.

maybe we should resort to kidnapping. Honestly, Im just tired of the excuses.

Redskins had no problem getting a proven head coach. It worked out pretty well for them. Gruden is available. Cowher is available. Yes, give me Billick. Failure? He won a !@#$ing super bowl and has playoff experience - i'll take that failure any day. ****, I'd take Pete Carroll at this point who has more football knowledge in his toenail than most of the candidates we'll interview.

EXACTLY. I don't know where/how the hell some of the people even brought the race issue into this.

Yup. I don't want another former defensive coordinator with very little/no HC experience. After cleaning house I want significant change...I want some past HC experience...i want more than the same **** we keep getting.

wtf are you babbling about..that's not where i was going with this. Fewell and Frazier are both defense coordinators, run pretty much the same kind of defense (except Frazier has a lot more talent), and are both unproven. Again, I expect more.

Going that route, why not keep Fewell as the HC then? Our defense was actually one of our stronger points the past few years, and the team did seem to respond to him somewhat..at least his record with this **** team was about .500 - better than dick. Nothing against Frazier, I just expect more.

I really can't understand the point of hiring someone like Frazier and letting go of Fewell. Really, WTF is the difference at this point?