All_Pro_Bills

I say if that's what they want then let the libs abort themselves out of existence over the next 20 to 30 years.

The Bills addressed some personnel problems in the off season, notably the offensive line. The expectation is better protection for Allen and some push in the running game along with adding some physical RB's to the group. The addition of Kincaid should eventually make the offense much more difficult to defend. I'm not so sure the WR group was upgraded much but word is the Bills are still in the running for Hopkins as long as it doesn't break the bank. Floyd and Rapp are good adds on defense and a healthy group of last year's core, minus Edmunds, should do well. What concerns me is that Miami and New York have also addressed some areas and while the Bills look to be better the division rivals have probably closed the gap.

You love yourself some BLM and Antifa riots. How many cops got injured in those? You guys didn't care about them one bit. How many 40 month sentences got handed out for attacking police, firebombing federal facilities? Like none! You cheered when liberal businesses refused to serve law enforcement people. You supported defunding police in crime infested cities. And my oh my, how that worked out so well! Now you're friends of the cops? I call bullsheet on that. Its just a convenient yet contradictory position to take because it suits the situation. Admit it.

This administration should know partisan hackery and obstruction when they see it. Other than playing victim, that's pretty much all they're good at. It's all Democrats did 2017 to 2020. Payback is what?

Funny because your cult hates cops.

Proof is simple observation. With few exceptions thie top jobs in this administration are filled by incompetent and unqualified people. The military is no exception.

Promotions under Biden are diversity driven to ensure the most unqualified commanders are promoted to the highest levels to meet the administration's quota objectives while putting the enlisted military men and women in danger that comes from substandard leadership.

Our friend @sherpa was pretty confident Russia's conventional force capability was inferior and they've performed more or less as expected. I have to believe the military and Russia analysts at the Pentagon, State dept, and Intelligence drew similar conclusions. But as is typical the publicly provided assessment strays from the confidential one.

There is indeed a lot of BS. The fact Russia's frontline force is a mercenary group is telling about the incompetency of their government forces. Another thing I find particularly absurd is that Putin's goal is to re-capture the former Soviet block States. They've demonstrated the ability to re-take nothing. Its pure fantasy. Surely, he must know that along with every military analyst at the Pentagon knows it. Every time I hear somebody articulate that danger I get a good chuckle. It's about as likely as me regaining my youthful energy and "good" looks. Something I've shouted out low and high is we should be.100 times more focused and concerned about China. In a lot of ways the obsession with Russia is a dangerous distraction from the real threat. Like worrying about a Racoon rifling through the trash can outside the cabin in the woods while unnoticed a pack of Wolves lurks just beyond the treeline. Lately. It seems that threat is started to get more attention but more is required. Not only are they building a formidable military they've also infiltrated most American private and public institutions through their program of "elite capture".

I appreciate your insights on these weapons systems and previous experience with Russian tactics and weapons which enables you to understand and "see" the conflict from the perspective of the opponent. A valuable skill in many areas. I do have a few follow up questions if I may? Short of tactical nukes, are there any weapons in the arsenal you would recommend being withheld for proprietary or other reasons like not wanting to risk the enemy capturing and reverse engineering it? Sure we said do whatever it takes but everything has constraints and risks. Do you think the Russians are holding back anything? Advanced weopons or assets like special forces units? What's your best case assessment for Ukraine? My rudimentary assessment is there's no path to victory, if that's defined as expelling Russia from all held territory, without a direct US/NATO combat commitment. That appears off the table, for now

I'm not familiar with the specifics of the rules of engagement but aren't civilian areas generally off limits regardless of the type of weapon?

They can easily drug test every government employee that was on duty that day. Nobody should protest. It's a matter of national security. If they can force you to take a shot it should be okay to provide a urine sample. And I assume all "guests" are required to sign in so it shouldn't be hard to narrow it down to a couple suspects by simple process of elimination. We all know the identity of one likely suspect but like every other suspicious action from this crew they'll bury it and the media will memory hole the story. While claiming Hunter is a victim of all those mean people suggesting a coke addict might be a prime suspect in this case. KJP will answer all questions on the topic by saying she doesn't want to get into hypothetical (I might try this approach when my boss asks me when I'll be finished with client requests. I'll let you know how that goes). When she speaks the no comment answer the WH press corps will bark on queue with approval and that will be the end of it. Just in case the emperors pretorian guard known in Washington as the FBI will be on call to harass anyone that says a discouraging word about the Biden's. Everyone enjoy your weekend.

Maybe you should wake up from your dream and ask why the FBI is running a political protection racket?

What Russia wanted was assurances NATO wouldn't park tactical weapons in Ukraine right across the border and in exchange Russia would reciprocate on their side of the border. This was clearly articulated in discussions which were attended by officials from Washington. Is that point of contention such a show stopper? Deescalate and remove offensive weapons from the border. Is avoiding that deal worth sacrificing 1/2 million lives and blowing $100 billion of borrowed money? Of course the response from the war hawks is we can't trust Putin to keep his word. But it's not his word. It's an easily verifiable and visible arrangement. What many are missing is this conflict is a mere sideshow and a diversion from what most of the rest of the world prefers. Negotiating mutually beneficial arrangements. And outside of the European vassal states the majority are looking to disengage from our 20 ton truck doesn't need road manners foreign policy. The consequences of this are much of the world is in the process of accelerating arrangements with other nations without the US being dealt into the deal. The BRICS alliance, the belt and road iniative, shanghai cooperative organization, energy deals in the Middle East, the Saudi's moving away support of US interests in the region, and most threatening China spreading their influence across the planet with business deals and economic development while we engage in perpetual conflict. The worst part of it is how so many are oblivious to it all.

The Council on Foreign Relations is a "think tank" that has consistently advocated and supported every failed war and intervention hatched in Washington. Among its ranks are lobbyists for weapons suppliers, neocons, and an army of war proponents that shuffle between the Federal bureaucracy and the defense industry and various organizations advocating for war. All that's been accomplished by this is to kill lots of people, line the pockets of Washington and defense industry insiders, and weaken our country from within and in the international community. This Ukraine fiasco will end no differently. Another one in the loss column. The other thing these clucks have accomplished, is what I expect will go down as one of the biggest strategic blunders in history which is to drive China and Russia together out of necessity and a common enemy. How stupid is that? To consciously make a decision to bring the #2 and #3 world powers together against you when it would have been just as easy to pursue a policy of engaging Russia to form a US/Russia/NATO alliance against China. That's my major beef with this entire conflict. Not some inclination to see one side or the other prevail or some flag waving exercise pretending we're supporting some fledgling democracy against evil but rather that it wasn't necessary and several better alternatives were available. But the sociopaths and savages just couldn't resist another opportunity to blow stuff up and watch more people die. So now we'll suffer the consequences of dropping down to #2 in a not so far off time.

Suburban middle/upper class liberal white women are too busy running their kids around town to various activities and Summer camps in their gas guzzling Escalades and Suburbans (with "Demand Climate Change Action Now" bumper stickers in a demonstration of no self-awareness) to have any time to worry about gun control laws as long as urban black young men are the majority of the people getting killed.

Thx. I'm familiar with the Council on Foreign Relations.

But they can recite the social justice classification hierarchy of victims from memory so the fringe nutjob set find them both to be immensely qualified.

And how do you know this? There's only a couple ways. You have firsthand knowledge or you have reports from trusted sources. But reports also indicate they're targeting hospitals, schools, malls, and old folks homes with missile strikes while avoiding any military targets. And didn't Ukrainian Nazi militia's murder Ukrainians of Russian descent in the Eastern provinces from 2014 to 2022?

I'd be curious to objectively understand what specific "rights" and "freedoms" poster believe Ukrainians have under Zelensky that support the conclusion they have more "democracy" than Russians do under Putin. For example, Zelensky's jailed journalists and outlawed opposition political parties in alignment with a couple things Putin has done. I think its pretty close to a draw.

She fits right in with the rest of the administration. If you've ever seen some of Biden's cabinet level appointees testify to Congress they don't know anything about doing their job either. It fits with hiring the dumbest person you can find as long as they check off all the diversity and inclusion boxes on the application.

It's been great for the Washington neocons, psychopaths, and other assorted war lovers. None of them have been killed, yet. But I'm holding out hope Satan will soon summon them back to Hell.

Of course we already know with 100% certainty that any official investigation will fail to determine the identity of the responsible individual and the case will be closed without any charges being filed. Even though everyone with a pulse and a heartbeat knows exactly who the primary suspect is here.

The censorship and media community have decided its in your best interest to not include the fact the shooter was associated with BLM because in their opinion it's an unnecessary detail. No need to worry yourself about how that might impact motive or the selection of the targets. Maybe that association did impact the actions of the shooter or maybe it didn't but let's avoid having that conversation. Or maybe the person is simply mentally deranged? Leaving out some facts to spin the story in the appropriate direction is a tactic commonly referred to as lying by omission. Or maybe the investigating super sleuth reporters employed by these major news outlets will reveal the shooter is one of those Black, White Supremacists we've been hearing so much about recently? But seriously, my expectation is since the shooter is some cross dressing weirdo they'll be portrayed in some fashion as "the victim". Watch and see.