All_Pro_Bills

By his looks its obvious he's a white supremast. And I'm sure he doesn't list his pronouns on his social media profiles or his e-mail signatures. He a dangerous extremist that also denies science and his words put others in danger of violence and hate. Did I cover everything?

Few dispute that. What is disputable is the hypocracy and selective enforcement where others attacking Federal facilities and officers, rioting, looting, destroying public and private property, and committing acts of violence against other citizens and law enforcement got a free pass from Democratic administration's throughout the country because the violence helped the party leading up to the 2020 election. And by magic it all suddenly stopped when party leaders found it was counter-productive to the cause. That's the problem most liberals turn a blind eye to and refuse to acknowledge. That makes it comical when they cite the rule of law. But only when it's convenient.

Next week we'll hear they concluded Trump left it there when he dropped the bag of coke while carrying out all those boxes of top secret documents.

On top of that the people at Time magazine think its white supremacy. The magazine would seem to suggest the most recently uncovered big threat is gay, or straight, white men and adjacent white (these idiots love to make up new terms and categories) people of color, or anyone else for that matter, that exercises regularly. All those professional NBA and NFL players. People going to the gym after work or in the morning. The guy or gal you see jogging down the street at 6 AM. All exposed as extremists. "The White Supremacist Origins of Exercise, and 6 Other Surprising Facts About the History of U.S. Physical Fitness" https://time.com/6242949/exercise-industry-white-supremacy/

I have no idea who they hell, or what, you're talking about. You need to get outside more and enjoy the real world instead of monitoring this twitter and this message board 24/7 while quoting all these idiots all day long.

They should put you in charge of missing persons because you've got a knack for finding every obscure screw ball and idiot on social media.

What I love is how we're forced to make such a simple issue a complex series of discussions because nobody in any official capacity ever wants to tell the truth. If Mr. Epps is not or was not a federal informant or confidential resource then Federal law enforcement should be compelled to testify under oath that, "No", Mr Epps is not an information or confidential resource. How hard is that? Problem solved. End of the mystery. And don't give us that "I cannot confirm or deny" BS. If he's not, he's not, and there should be no issue in saying that. The only reason for them to keep quiet is that Epps is an informant. That's all there is to it.

All most people want is the truth so good. Put Epps on the witness stand, along with various government dudes, and people in the crowd he's alleged to have encouraged to breach the Capitol, and let them testify under oath that Ray wasn't a government informant, didn't incite the crowd, and wasn't there to still up trouble on 1/6. No I can't confirm or deny excuses type testimony because you can take the 5th to protect yourself from self-incrimination but you can't take the 5th to protect somebody else. Like the identity of a confidential informant, for example. Just the truth. If he's not then his lawsuit has merit and good luck to him and shame on Fox.

Are you unaware that exercise and working out has been exposed as a white supremacist activity by the social justice cult? Along with defining another terrible injustice: fitness inequality. So the better a person's physical condition and physique, the bigger a racist they are.

You theory is completely unsupported by the facts. And its okay to lie to us but please don't lie to yourself.

That's really what you think is going on here? Rather than some complex and intricate conspiracy, Occam's Razor says that laptop is legit, the FBI's been sitting on the evidence, the DOJ has not interest is pursuing charges against the big guy, and the Biden's are dirtier than pigs in a mud hole. But you'd never admit to that so that's that.

Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Its not over until we say its over!

All the world's s stage for these fakers.

That's it. And most poster here that objectively see the attacks on Trump for what they are, partisan politics and abuse of power, will admit he's an A Hole. Most also think Biden's a major league A Hole. A crook and a puppet peddling the Obama wing of the party's agenda. In short, both major parties have leadership issues. But with few exceptions, the Trump haters will never, ever admit their guy is just as slimy while making all kinds of excuses for not admitting Biden's a dirty dog raking in payoffs and influence money. Never a discouraging word. My advice to them is its okay to lie to me but don't lie to yourself and believe your story that this guy is clean.

You're implying that by playing kill the messenger. And I'm not reading twitter but specifically what "propagandist" are you referring to? The "safe and effective" narrative types? Those propagandists? The guy gave the FBI everything they needed 6 years ago. And like the laptop that statement got buried. Until a couple weeks ago since he started making public statements about bribes and payoffs and suddenly it's news. All these stories lead to the same ending. If somebody provides the FBI with statements or material on somebody they're protecting it gets lost. That's the real story. Who is directing the FBI to run protection rackets for specific politicians? Other than that and run entrapment operations I have no idea what they do.

Thank God they were stopped! We were minutes away from the civilian government surrendering control of all branches of government and every institution to the insurrectionists as the military and law enforcement were rendered powerless by some magical force as all of the Pentagon's troops and weapons were no match for this group of unarmed marauders. Only the unexpected and unexplained mass exit from the building that day saved our nation from plunging into chaos that would have resulted if the anti-democratic forces from prevailing.

Hoax. You care about protecting liberal politicians. None of that, true or false, exonerates the Biden's from any accusations and factual accounts of their contacts and meetings with various Chinese contacts where they traded influence for money.

Yes. What's curious is this indictment is from 2017 while the original post and tweets from various twits makes it seem like it happened yesterday. So suddenly the order is sent down to the mainstream media and social media machine to charge up and communicate a 6 year old story. The timing is rather coincidental to other whistler blowers coming forward. It says the Biden's and their protectors have abandoned the denial strategy and are now forced into fire fighting. A kill the messenger approach perhaps both literally and figuratively for now. What was it on another thread, "the walls are closing"? Start the countdown. You win today's gold star for being first at tagging this to Trump. But that Newsweek story is smoke and mirrors to divert attention from the main theme. Biden's dirty. You better find another candidate for 2024 because he's finished.

I did see this interesting fun fact. The whistleblower reportedly worked with CEFC-USA—the nonprofit arm of the Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China—between 2015 and 2018, the same period CEFC-China began its influence operations with the Biden family. He told the DOJ and the FBI in Brussels that Joe Biden, soon after his vice presidential term ended, had attended a meeting at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, DC, with his son Hunter and officials from CEFC. His account of the former VP’s presence at that meeting was corroborated 21 months later when the FBI interviewed another attendee, Biden family associate Rob Walker, according to recent testimony before Congress. He disclosed during the Brussels interview that CEFC was paying $100,000 a month to Hunter and $65,000 to his uncle Jim Biden, in exchange for their FBI connections and use of the Biden name to promote China’s Belt and Road Initiative around the world — and that the money was being funneled through Walker. The most “alarming” information he shared in Brussels pertained to a mole in the DOJ who shared classified information with Hunter Biden and his Chinese partners. Obviously, all of it should be immediately dismissed.

The lesson here is if you've got the goods on somebody in Washington, the last group of people on Earth you want to trust is the FBI.

Lying is an essential skill for communists. If they told the truth about their desire to brainwash your children I suspect they'd meet a lot more resistance. Instead, they just need to convince all the idiots that anyone opposed to their ideas is ethical and morally compromised. Shout out the same slogans over and over again and avoid any details. Or facts, and God forbid, any objective discussions. Just say it over and over. The big lie, right? Ops, there's one of those references. I think the lesson of history is evil people disguising their agenda use and run the same playbook. And while Hitler was evil, both Mao and Stalin, two infamous communists, killed way more people than Hitler. He's at best #3. The communists killed 40, maybe 50 million. Let's not forget or overlook that fact.

FBI Director Comey publicly boasted of his intent to entrap Flynn. Sure Flynn fell for it. But this admission at a minimum should tell you Comey's intentions were tainted. I might add, he also admitted passing confidential information to his contact at the NY Times leaking news of an ongoing investigation (a real big no-no according to AG Garland) and by way of some slight of hand somehow avoided any charges under the now famous Espionage Act. Yet another pesky exception to that nobody is above the law mantra most curiously when the perpetrator provides an unambiguous public confession. A slamdunk prosecution for any first year law student. But surprise! Off to the talk show circuit instead of jail.

The thing about war crimes is with few exceptions they're generally committed by the losers. After WW2 there were the Nuremberg trials of former Nazi officials and SS officers for assorted atrocities, murder, and crimes against humanity. Completely appropriate. But, for example, no WW2 British or American civilian or military leaders were charged with the firebombing of Dresden, a target with no military value, in February 1945 which targeted a civilian population with casualty estimates as high as 250K deaths. The RAF sent 800 bombers on the night of 2/13/1945 followed up by a US air corps 210 bomber daytime raid on 2/15/1945. History demonstrates you win the war, you write the story, you skate off free and clear.

Its a damn alternative reality freak show! Most amazing is how you can get so many people that know its all horseshit to go along with it. In this case pageant judges. And these chicks cheering it on? Are they nuts too? They're cowards and enablers, afraid to make a stand and tell the truth. That's a dude folks! What is the malfunction going on between their ears that makes them think otherwise? "When you deny what is self-evident, you are at war with reality, and that never ends well. This is the ultimate disposition of our country’s years-long misadventure in maximum dishonesty". from Jim Kunstlers blog today.

That's not what @reddogblitzsaid. The premise was a war of attrition would favor the side with the larger force. That seems logical and mathematically sound. Its a reasonable question to ask under circumstances when somebody pledges unlimited support. So if it comes to the point where they don't have enough soldiers to either win the war or fight to a stalemate what's the action coming out of the administration's "whatever it takes" pledge to fix that problem? Outside of surrender it would be get some troops from someplace else, So where is this someplace else? How is asking that question appeasement? Does "whatever it takes" include US forces in direct combat operations? Yes or no? And if the answer is "no" are you prepared to allow Ukraine to lose?