All_Pro_Bills

Who do you think controls this two-tier system?

Government Corruption for $2,000 Alex. And the answer is "Influence Peddling".

Josh was reckless and undisciplined. Purposely and knowingly ignoring the risks and consequences of some act. Like throwing the ball into double & triple coverage. You know it's a bad idea, it's something that shouldn't be done unless it's desperation time, but you do it anyway. It's some kind of behavioral issue or defect in his thought process. He might need counseling or therapy, or the team needs to hire a behavior psychologist. Whatever the coaches and teammates are saying isn't working. Now we get to hear I can't let that happen and I've got to play smart and not let the team down. Does anybody believe a word of that?

I understand the idea of reading the defense but exactly how do QB's like Brady and Manning do it vs. how Allen is processing what he sees? Is there something basic he was doing that got unlearned? Other than making bad choices maybe its why is he making bad choices? I mean by the 2nd year any QB knows throwing into double or triple coverage is reckless, and also stupid. So why is he doing it? And how do they get the problem fixed? One other change I might want to see is bringing the OC down to the field to get more face-to-face time and conversation between Dorsey and Allen.

So, are we establishing the idea that if Putin says it we should all automatically disagree? Even if he's correct? What's the thing here? You still pushing this fake Trump/Putin thing?

When Rodgers went down the Bills should have immediately gone 4-3 as it was obvious the Jets weren't going to be airing it out. Always waiting until the damage is done to adjust rather than anticipating is a constant issue with the staff. Watch and learn Sunday 9/24 how Belichik plays the Wilson led Jets O. It won't be 4-2-5.

So did Joe by participating in a criminal enterprise that took bribes and sold influence.

Clearly, if there's no evidence of wrongdoing there's nothing to fear.

Funnier is they're trying to disqualify the leading candidate of the opposition party while ignoring the problem of the incumbent's chances of being reelected are approaching zero. Add in that his mental capacity is diminished to the point that he can't even produce a coherent sentence. How can you conclude anything other than the American political system is a dumpster fire.

I think Dorsey needs to be on the sidelines and out of the box to get a better feel for the game and get face-to-face time with his QB. I thought about McDermott sitting down on the sidelines and having a talk with Allen but the problem is he's calling the defense so when the offense in on the field he can't talk with Allen and when the defense is out there he's calling the plays. So all he's got is halftime, time outs, and TV breaks.

Seems like it. I think they also have the number of the Bills offense. Its not the entire story and I'm not looking to take Allen off the hook for bad decisions. But I think it all starts with the Jets defense, coaches and players, have no fear or respect for the Bills running game other than Allen's escaping the pocket. If you want to slow down the pass rush and force the defense to bring the safeties out of playing 2 deep you need to have an effective run game. When you need it. I thought that was the idea of signing Harris and Murray. Two bigger backs that play a physical game, break some tackles, and get the tough yards.

This team beats itself through a series of blunders by the players and coaches. Last night once again. As soon as Rodgers went out McDermott should have dropped that base nickel and went 4-3. Everybody knew what was coming, lots of runs. Big chunks plays too. Who was surprised? They wern't going 3 or 4 or 5 wide and throwing the ball downfield. Was he paying attention? After halftime I thought the only way the Bills lose is with turnovers. I expect lots of others thought the same. And Josh delivered right on schedule. And I'm sorry, James Cook is not a feature back. Damien Harris, 1 carry. He should have been getting fed the ball on running plays against a very good front where space and running holes are lacking. Move the chains, shorten the game in the 2nd half. The Jets stayed in hi two safety all night not worried about run support because as usual no commitment to the run when the situation called for it. No Rodgers. Nothing the Bills did looked unexpected. Like they were sitting in on Dorsey's game plan sessions all week. I didn't see anything particularly obvious out of Ken to feel they did anything unique or specific to the Jets. It's the same predictable stuff again with a little better receiver group. Where's the creativity and awareness of Josh's lack of patience and judgement when he's got to play the short game? This dog needs a shorter leash. Is the offensive line any better? We'll see in the next few weeks.

I said the same thing about Tom Brady 15 years ago. It might be a long wait for you here too.

As they see all things through the lens of subjectivity, I expect your question can't be answered until you tell them the race and gender identity of the other person.

That idea is another fantasy which takes something one person said to suggest it applies to a wider audience of people. You guys learned that from Mao and Stalin and Bill Ayers. And logically why would the authoritarians in control want a civil war? Duh.

Good question. A 2023 liberal is a person that supports an intrusive and authoritarian big central government, which they control, imposing its will on the public in every aspect of life as there can be no separation between public and private life. Now it's certain any 2023 self-identified liberal will disagree. That's to be expected. They perceive themselves to be champions of "democracy" fighting those evil people seeking to impose a dictatorship. The comical thing is they have no problem using the tactics and methods of a dictator to stop them. The idea being impose an authoritarian one-party dictatorship to stop others from imposing an authoritarian one-party dictatorship. A beat them to the punch approach. That last part is the irony.

I think the root of the problem is the outrageously high tuition charged by these universities and colleges. Like $40K and higher. Some sitting on billion dollar endowment funds while soaking parents and students. Acedemic institutions running a country club for intellectuals living the comfortable life pillaging the system and comsuming high level of resources while producing little of value. A permanent vacation. No wonder they support socialism. They're already living it. A cost/benefit of that colege degree weighing in with interest and expected income might show it a poor investment. In terms of fairness, it's not right to require somebody to start their work life in a financial bottomless pit. I'm not against these student debt relief efforts but there should be some means test and the colleges should bear, lets say 1/2 the costs, not just the taxpayers.

This Musk story, which isn't much of a story when examined, follows the standard process of how the establishment attacks anyone that defies or threatens their interests. It's all dependent on how many rote "thinkers" they get engaged to support it all. The common thread is they all start with a lie that is transformed to truth by designed repetition. Everyone should understand by now that anyone that defies the official narrative is helping <insert bad guy name here> by refusing to go along with one lunacy or another. But choose a side, our side, the good guys or the bad guys. There's no other option. Love it or leave it. My country right or wrong. You get the idea. You're absolutely discouraged from engaging in logical or reasoned thinking that might cause you to draw your own conclusions outside of those being generated by various think tanks, for profit entities and their supporters, or various government actors, and the standard cast of mainstream and social media grifters that always back up the story. For gigles add in the usual characters here on PPP that are ready and willing to pile on and when the bell rings as they all bark right on queue.

In the brief, Willis summarily dismissed the comparison between the action of the Georgia defendants and “actions that did not result in prosecution 60 years ago in a different jurisdiction with different election code and criminal statutes, presided over by different prosecuting agencies, and with differing substantive evidence of criminal intent.” And most important and obvious but left unsaid.. that she's out to get Trump. Please excuse me if we're still playing that "rule of law" game of peek-a-boo.

And yet its costing Federal, State, and local governments billions and billions to support the influx of "asylum seekers". Its magic!

Unless you buy into the idea that in his elder years Joe Biden has suddenly transformed into a radical progressive championing social justice issues and causes, how can you believe this administrations priorities and political agenda align with anything Biden has supported and advocated for his entire political life.

You are a walking, talking, talking point personified. Always on script and on story. Bravo. Anyway, you asked a question and I gave you answer. What more do you expect?

How long before Biden gets dumped and we find out that Obama has been running a WFH operation while relaying instructions and directives to the ventriloquist dummy in the Oval Office?

The imbeciles welded the doors open so try and figure it out from there.

Musk said, "NEVER turned Starlink on in those controversial border zones - for exactly this reason, as he feared using this technology near borders could prompt an escalation in the war". Nobody turned off anything because it was never turned on. The story is another liberal hoax targeting somebody that refuses to do their bidding. With the standard coordinated and choreographed fake outrage in unison group of a-holes working 24/7 to convince people their lie is truth. Now that the truth is out let's change the story and tell me, but, but, but, he should have had it turned on from the beginning anyway because no private citizen has the right to decide for themselves whether or not they should become involved in somebody else's conflict.