All_Pro_Bills

I expect there is no "there" in regard to Cole's leanings to the Right. I'd put money on it. Because every time some nut case surfaces the usual suspects instinctively attempt to peddle the same story from the same playbook that the guy is pro-Trump. Seeing how things work if there was evidence he was pro-Trump he would have been arrested on 1/7 and that J6 committee would have certainly gone "there".

If Cole was associated with Trump supporters or sympathetic to MAGA he would have been arrested on January 7th. End of story.

That is one plausible scenario. I'm going to wait before embracing any motivation story. 1st for a Grand Jury to hear evidence for an indictment.

What's you're guess on the J6 bombers motivation to plant pipe bombs at both party HQ locations? And the previous administration lack of motivation to find him?

Nice little summary about the impact of the J6 bomber. https://www.kunstler.com/p/cold-case-heats-up

The MSM will avoid asking why the Biden DOJ/FBI having most of the evidence failed to act. They won't be able to hide this story. But they're hesitate to show the suspect's photo. And will describe the suspect as a "dark skinned white male". If you need a clue about media bias just listen carefully how they describe a story, What words they choose to use and those they avoid and leave out while adding closers such as "despite a lack of evidence" or "while not providing details".

I think you're right about the conversation. Because in the grand game of life nothing anyone here says is going to materially change anything. PPP is just a place to share views and opinions and then agree or disagree about them. Everyone has their own unique perspective and experiences. Some take it seriously, others not so much. And I believe that if everyone agrees on everything then nobody is thinking. Same with the stadium wall. Over there we've got lots of expert GM's and coaches that know what needs to be done to fix problems, draft player and sign free agents. Sometimes including me! A lot of them might be right but nobody is putting them in charge.

Wondering what left leaning NGO funds this operation?

Republicans against Trump? The might as well call themselves "Chronic losers that are content with finishing in 2nd place in a 2 horse race". While I like Rand Paul he's too much of an idealist. And in my experience idealists don't get much done.

Protect the football. In 4 losses the Bills have turned the ball over 11 times (NE = 3, Atl = 2, Mia = 3, Hou = 3). That's losing 11 possessions and scoring opportunities and giving the opponent points of turnovers chances. 2 of 4 of the losses were one score games. Lose the turnover battle on the road in the playoffs and its an early off season.

Every game is different. And sometimes the result is unexpected. Look at the Rams on Sunday. Who had the Panthers here? Honestly, I thought the Bills were going to lose to Pittsburgh. So I didn't expect the Bills would be able to run all over the Steelers defense and I didn't expect the Bills defense to be so good against the run either. Maybe the 10 day mini-bye gave the defense time to iron out all their problems? If they perform down the stretch the same way then good things can happen. The Bengals are 31st against the run but seem to be trending up a bit. The Bills 30th and looking the same. And obviously their passing game with Burrow back and Higgins and Chase at WR will be superior to the Steelers offense. To win I expect the Bills will need to be efficient in the run game but the passing game needs to contribute a lot more. I'm not sure what the status is for Kincaid's availability, or Dawkins, Brown, Palmer, or how much a week more of time for Cooks to come up to speed on the offense will do. A big question is how the pass defense plays against top-end WR's. The weather forecast for Sunday is cold, cloudy, and not a lot of wind so that might not be a factor. I think its critical the passing game becomes at least functional before the playoffs to have a chance of advancing past the wild card round.

And nobody I know is cheering on these speed boat attacks.

Not that I knew much of anything about him or was ever a fan, but that's the way the the most rabid and politically indoctrinated on the left reacted to Charlie Kirk's murder. The public record of their blood-lust is undeniable. So who does that 1984 quote really describe?

An interesting question. But I could pose the exact same question to the anti-Trump folks here. Isn't it risky to criticize an authoritarian dictator that sends "Nazi death squads" out into the night to eliminate his detractors and political enemies? Why are the group of six that dare to question the orders given by the supreme ruler even still alive? Shouldn't they, at a minimum, be in some interment camp undergoing re-education? Why are these anti-ICE demonstrators still out on the streets? Causing trouble for the regime's terror squads in the round-up of innocent "brown people". Shouldn't 21st century Hitler have given the "illegal order" to eliminate them in a hail of gunfire or ship them off to some secret concentration camp? And gotten away with it all because, well he's a dictator?

It works pretty well for the drug dealers. Do you understand In their business showing compassion and empathy is a sign of weakness?