Jump to content

thebandit27

Community Member
  • Posts

    21,985
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by thebandit27

  1. Well, either you’re right and we’ll all laud your insider info, or... ...it’ll be see ya next username... Either way I’ll be happy!
  2. This is speculation? What about your gem from the other thread about the defense’s mojo where you straight up said this? And then said that you had “proof”? You're now retracting that and saying it’s speculation?
  3. Kinda like the team was going to... Sign Kirk Cousins? Sign Case Keenum? Build a stadium in Batavia? Hire a former NFL head coach as an offensive quality control staff? What you’ve done in the past is throw any piece of 💩 you can think of at the wall and hope one of them sticks...that’s why you got banned before, and it’s probably going to happen again if in fact that’s what you’re doing this time around. Now I hope that’s not the case, because I’d love to see a trade that helps the team... but as a guy that’s occasioned to get a scoop out of 1BD in the recent past, I can say that it tends to go a lot smoother if you deliver the information in a much different fashion.
  4. Should we... connect the dots? follow the data points? read the tea leaves?
  5. I suspect McDermott will show a number of different coverage looks, but I think you’ll see the typical Cover-3 and Quarters stuff we’ve been doing all year once the ball is snapped—keep it simple, but make it look complicated.
  6. Please...you specifically spelled out what you meant... If you didn’t mean that they’d get too conservative with a multiple score lead, then you defined it poorly, so needling me as though I don’t know what running up the score means is silly given the context of the discussion. And under either definition, you’re mistaken.
  7. Don’t play man against Cam—that’s one thing he can beat. He’ll run and create offense with some matchups. Zone him; he isn’t going to pick you apart Hey I’ll call them bad when they’re bad. No issue with that... but to compare Buffalo’s relative suckitude to NE’s****** in losing 4 straight is misguided IMO.
  8. ^ this is what you said Example of multiple score lead: Rams game. Absolutely played to win. What is the source of confusion here?
  9. Yes, I watch every NFL game every week...and I don’t agree with you. Gene, if you need me to quote your post I’ll do so...
  10. Both team kind of suck? The Bills are 4-2 with losses to 2 of the top 6 teams in football.
  11. I think it was the Matt Cassel game in Buffalo where there were 50 MPH winds. The Pats****** played with 7 OLmen all game and we lined up in a nickel 😂 Without looking I believe we lost 10-0
  12. Now see that makes sense to me, and would, in fact, be a penalty.
  13. The Bills were up 28-10 and Allen was heaving deep throws—including the one that Kroft caught that was somehow deemed an INT. Your original point was that “McConservative” won’t try to run up the score, but instead simply play to protect a lead if his team ever (hypothetically) got a 2-score lead.
  14. I freakin dare them to play man against us...that’s a bet I’ll take all day long. Wait, what? You specifically said that the Bills under McDermott would stop trying to score when they get a lead, and now you’re saying that you don’t understand why I’m asking what the offensive play calling was like when they had a 28-3 lead this year? Really? Either you totally lost track of the discussion or you’re messing with me...
  15. So when Buffalo was leading the Rams 28-3 in week 3, did the offense stop trying to score? Did they stop throwing?
  16. you called out the coach for being too conservative
  17. Oh stop. We were ahead by 4 in Miami and threw 2 consecutive bombs to the end zone with less than 3 minutes remaining. Is that “McConservative” to you? How does it rate in contrast to the Seahawks last night, who ran the ball 3 straight times and punted with a 3-point lead instead of giving the best QB in the a chance to get 2 yards and secure a win on the road vs a divisional opponent?
  18. Do we? I mean, all we know about the 2020 version is that they’re 2-4 with the 31st ranked scoring offense.
  19. For me, this game is enormous. Win, and you’re 6-2 with a stranglehold on the division and have exorcised the proverbial Pats****** demon. Lose, and you’ve opened the door to missing the playoffs after starting red hot. This game hinges on the offense. We know what the Pats****** will do: they’ll try to take away Diggs and make Allen beat them with the short stuff. Force him to be patient and try to keep him out of the end zone like the Jets did. Buffalo is going to have to counter with some creative designs to develop red zone mismatches and/or create space to run the ball effectively down inside the 20. Defensively the book is out on Cam: sit back in coverage and he can’t hurt you.
  20. Because it happened twice in the last 20 years? That’s not a pattern.
×
×
  • Create New...