Captain Caveman

I'm not sure if that was supposed to be counterargument to my post, but the fact is the lowest percentage owned by the team lead is 10%. That was the original statement, and it's true. Yes, there is a stipulation that family must own another 20%. Saying that the minimum that the leader can own is 30% is false. So is Latvia, it doesn't mean they can buy an NFL team.

Not anymore. http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/63869

I just reread my post - the lead owner has to have at least 10%. Your numbers are flipped, but the point remains the same. It's not happening.

First is the rule that ownership groups must contain twenty-four or fewer individuals, with I believe the lowest percentage owned by any 1 person being 10%.

Right, but you need the line in place in order to have the conversation. Otherwise you wind up with David Carr.

Yeah, Gailey has totally been unable to admit when wrong. Like when he cut Edwards, or said we might go back to the 4-3. Oh, wait.

I wonder if that chemistry has anything to do with... DIABEETUS!

probably in a better fashion than the likes of chris kelsay.

Wait, are you saying we should draft Dan Marino? Or just pick a QB with lousy #s? In either case, nice thinking.

These guys don't have the opportunity to fax out resumes. They're under contract. And the players are part of the problem, so I don't understand any sympathy for them. Ralph is telling the truth. This team stinks. If they don't like it, they need to perform better, or find another profession.

I'd feel embarrassed, and I'd work as hard as I could to show the owner and my colleagues (not to mention other employers) that I was a good worker and could be counted on.

I think it's more a question of him not being very effective going over the middle, not that he refuses to do it.

Yeah, but I thought this was going to be about Alf. Dick Jauron is back in pog form.

I don't get it.

Take anything out of Thurman's mouth with a shaker of salt.

BS. Our best player was so disgruntled because he was a headcase, asking for a second reworking of his contract in three years. F that.

How many years does a guy have upside?

Randy Moss was just traded for what will likely be a the later part of the third round. In this light, the talk of Evans for a 1st (or 1st and 2nd?) seems incredibly far fetched. (Remember that the Rams picks are likely to be much higher than the Vikings picks this year.) I have to say, with all of the woe is me posts here over the past couple of weeks, I actually don't mind the ridiculous trade ideas as much.

Lining up offsides, illegal formation (not lined up on the line of scrimmage.) Just another indication of a sloppy team. I'm losing patience with this coaching staff, and it has less to do with losing than it does the fact that we seem to be getting worse.

Eric Wood is the guy you're calling out after this game? Jeebus.

I totally agree, I think this is GB blowing smoke. (This is not a vote of confidence in our front office, I just don't think the article makes any sense.)

I am appalled and excited.

Peters wasn't run out of town because he stunk. He was run out of town because he was a lazy, greedy SOB. Oh, and here I am!

Through the internet?

I get that cheating is cheating, but there are allegations of 1 woman for Favre right now, which are right now just allegations (it could get bigger, but that's all I've seen so far.) Tiger had a new woman coming out every day. I don't see how you can compare the 2.