Do we really need to rehash this again?
Every report I read from the preseason, both from reporters at camp and from fans on this board said that Edwards was hands down the better QB in camp.
You're right, it's impossible for a player to improve with quality coaching. Oh wait, Fitzpatrick seems to have done just that.
Edwards was the best player in training camp this year and won the job. Then he sucked in real games and we cut him. Get over it.
So if you don't believe Gailey thought he could make Edwards better, what is your explanation for why he was given the starting job? A desire to fail? What you're saying doesn't make sense.
It's fine to say that you didn't believe Gailey could make Edwards better, but it's kind of bull **** to proclaim that even Gailey knew Edwards was !@#$ed. At least without some plausible explanation of why he then made him the starting qb.