Captain Caveman

http://deadspin.com/why-your-team-sucks-2014-chicago-bears-1627368933

With the British accent and everything?

God knows that footwork, play action, and the way he delivers the ball on BB.com really make or break a QB.

chop chop dig dig

Three turnovers in one half is awful. How is that complicating things?

I'm tired of being a wannabe league bowler, I wannabe a league bowler.

Are there any updates on this?

Was just coming to post that. I would have gotten in trouble for laughing loudly at work, except I'm working from my bedroom today.

This is about as threatening as a member of the house of representatives getting involved.

Does this count as Godwin's law?

Waaggghh, but I have to see all these narcissists in my facebook feed. In 2013, ALSA had $25 million in revenue.

you mean, like, not Brawndo?

bull **** NO ONE STILL LIKES THE ANCHOR BAR

Yeah, unlikely to happen this year, but doesn't mean he's out of the woods.

For everyone complaining about ignoring the position in free agency - Did you see a different Thad Lewis than I did last year? Because based on last year's performance in actual games, I was happy with him as our backup. I don't know what happened to the man since then, but I'm surprised that so many people here seemed to have seen this coming.

Did anyone post Championship! yet?

We mix my son's apple juice with water. It's refreshing, but there's no sugar high. Sounds like a 9-7 season.

Is that saying even true? I would think it would be darkest at the time in between sunset and sunrise (not accounting for moon fullness, clouds, etc....)

So unless you're the Buffalo Bills?

I would not see a band named perpetually unsustainable.

Ok. That's not what I wrote at all though.

The title is a bit of a joke based on a thread from a few years ago when we were 4-1, largely resulting from a large turnover differential in our favor. It will be clear to me that anyone who responds with some numbskull comment about 15 seasons of sustainable losing did not actually read the post. It seems many here are ready to throw in the towel (or have already done so) based on one half of football where three separate players caused three costly turnovers. This leaves a sour taste in my mouth, and it doesn't bode well that the team completely self destructed in the first half. With that said, IMO it is very unlikely that we will see these kind of ball security issues (at least at this level) continue. And if you take away (or reduce) the turnovers, I think Saturday's game looks very different, and maybe the panic / hysteria is slightly reduced? I'm not saying it's good that we had so many turnovers, I'm not saying we should overlook the loss, or the way the team seemed to fall apart after a few bad plays, although I did take some comfort in the fact that they seemed to rebound in the second half. I'm not even saying I'm optimistic going into this season. I am saying it's usually not as bad as you think after a loss, and it's usually not as good as you think after a win (or even when you're 4-1.) We'll see where things shake out, but I'm not ready to give up just yet.

So are you expecting three turnovers by our offense in the first half of every game this year? Cause yeah, that would be tough to come back from.