TheChimp

Now Gailey is just pissing me off. Down by 15 and three runs in a row.

I need to take this opportunity to apologize to Aaron Schoebel. He could have easily been the difference today.

Either one works, yeah. But if they re-sign Kelsay, I'm gonna puke.

The big thing this game shows me, though, is that as far as the Lines go, the D-Line should be addressed first.

What a POS call

Time for the D-Line to wake the !@#$ up and make a goddam play.

Please, God, let our D-Line actually get to Brady today.

So many ways to lose games, all of them on our Lines.

Lindell's streak is over.

So the Bills' major defects become even more obvious in this game. Both our Lines are terrible. Too bad we don't have a Fitz on Defense to make up for the D-Line. They are horrid.

Who cares anymore? If the Bills had won that ruling, probably we'd have gone to the Superbowl and lost by 45 points. Or at least by "2 yards". So !@#$ it.

Try GAS-X

TEN YEARS happened. Going on eleven. Desperate times call for desperate measures. I'm fully behind the tanking maneuver. FULLY.

Maybe putting Fitz in, Gailey gets a better chance to evaluate his O-Line and receivers. The best communicator might have just been picked to be the field general. No doubt Gailey knows that Fitz doesn't have the innate physical skills to be the future of the team at QB, but he probably is heads and tails above Brohm right now in his ability to communicate with his Center, which could make all the difference in those extra three seconds of time back there in the pocket to get the ball to his first or second choice WRs....I dunno, the thought just popped into my head so I spewed it.

Mr. Voight probaly just had it with all the signs, clogging up the scenery and breaking his mind.

I'm with you, haze. I don't see a single guy on our O-Line who doesn't smack of 'backup', MAYBE Wood, but that's even a stretch. The entire line is swiss cheese.

Ooooh HARSH! but true.

We weren't even the third-worst team in the league in 1984 and 1985? How about 1986?

Here ya go, this one is even better: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1199889/pg2

HA! Priceless!

I'm with you on this one. TO would have forced the defenses to at least commit their best DB to cover him, and that would have helped our offense that teeny bit. Without him, no defense even CARES which DBs cover WHICH Bills WRs, because none of them are playmakers (except Lee Evans on long bombs and no other types of routes). And Chan, if I recall, named James Hardy as the guy who could simply replace TO out there. So in that regard, yeah, Chan is looking pretty stupid right now, IMO.

You mean one point per emo, right? Ten total points sounds about right to me. All scored in the 4th quarter against the Pats 3rd stringers.

Agreed on Ralph, one thousand percent. BUT, why is it that you don't think that new ownership would help?

Maybe the offers for our RBs have all been shite. I'm not going to fault Gailey TOO bad yet that Lynch is still here, I suppose. Because Green Bay might have felt their backup RB could hold his own and might have offered the Bills FAR less than what Gailey and Nix think they can get for him down the line. I dunno. But as far as Bell and Vick go, it does kinda suck to see Bell go for nothing after such a good showing, and Vic, well, I hate to see such douchebags do well. It's like Ray Lewis. I hate watching him play because he's the biggest a-hole in the league and still beats the crap out of pretty much every guy matched up with him, game in and game out.

It takes more than one draft to fill all the holes the Bills have. I'm personally happy we have a differencemaker in the backfield while we wait for this new coach to hopefully figure out which O-Linemen we need to help get him through to the secondary.