X. Benedict Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 I have been thinking about responding to this, but I decided not to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 I have been thinking about responding to this, but I decided not to. Dude! You broke our little numbers only posts streak! I'll try to get it back on track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 12/21/2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 10, 2009 Author Share Posted November 10, 2009 12/21/2012. Why is 6 afraid of 7? Because 7 8 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 This thread has now gone over 4 pages in length. I ask, nay, I DEMAND that this thread be closed. If this thread isn't closed I'm going to throw a temper tantrum and go have a good cry. All you can just go to hell! & another thing...I win you bunch a pathetic losers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 This thread has now gone over 4 pages in length. I ask, nay, I DEMAND that this thread be closed. If this thread isn't closed I'm going to throw a temper tantrum and go have a good cry. All you can just go to hell! & another thing...I win you bunch a pathetic losers. How am I ever going to read over 2,800 posts to get filled in?!?! This damn thread is longer than Pelosi's health care bill, and probably makes more sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damj Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 12/21/2012. 2112 We have assumed control. We have assumed control. This thread is now closed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 2112 We have assumed control. We have assumed control. This thread is now closed! Then I win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemhoff Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 5150 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damj Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Then I win? Not even close ... BUD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemhoff Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 OU812 Can't go away that fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Even better 68, you blow me and I'll owe you one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodBye Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 12/21/2012. 3+3=5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooderson Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 3.141592654 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 7-9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delete This Account Posted November 11, 2009 Share Posted November 11, 2009 Dear sir, It has come to our attention that you have threatened legal action against our client (a.k.a.) Steely Dan. It is our contention that you have, around Sept. 2009 to Nov. 2009, caused our client injury such as severe cranial headaches, angst, head bashing and major discombobulation. It has also come to our attention that you have willingly and repeatedly "nyay'd" our client who is the ombudsman of the "Last Post Thread" located at Two Bills Drive. These actions have been looked over by our crack legal team, (not to be confused with our legal team on crack), and we have concluded that you are in direct violation of the Rubble vs. Flintstone decision of 1968. That Supreme Court decision explicitly sets a precedence for the penalties of discombobulating others on the internet. How they knew there would be such a thing as an internet in 1968 isn't important. What is, is that the ruling exists. Therefore you are to send Mr. Dan $200,000,000 and to pay our legal fees of $1,000,000,000 post haste. Sincerely, Bill Whatsamattar billwhatsamattar@upyoursjackass.com ah, but in "Bam Bam V Slate, Mr." the Surpreme Court explicitly rules that those claiming to be "Ombudsman" must first provide notarized papers expressly proving the validity to said claim to allow Rubble V Flinstone to carry merit. in that event, i have been advised to deposit said damages totaling $1,200,000,000 in a trust awaiting your compliance. and of course, you must be aware of the "Betty V Wilma" case, which places a statute of limitations on filing said papers prior to, and no further, after the 2,859th post of any thread. since there is no proof that these papers have been filed, we find ourselves back at what the laymen refer to as "Square Number 1." etc. etc. etc. jw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted November 11, 2009 Share Posted November 11, 2009 Back to the numbers: #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damj Posted November 11, 2009 Share Posted November 11, 2009 Back to the numbers: #2 So, you are the new number two. Who is number one? You are number six. I am not a number, I am a free man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 11, 2009 Author Share Posted November 11, 2009 Back to the numbers: #2 #9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts