Steely Dan Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Linkage Human-induced global warming is real, according to a recent U.S. survey based on the opinions of 3,146 scientists. However there remains divisions between climatologists and scientists from other areas of earth sciences as to the extent of human responsibility. May the bitching begin!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Didn't you hear, the Professor Irwin Corey school of thought says you can't have cold weather during global warming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 However the results of the investigation conducted at the end of 2008 reveal that vast majority of the Earth scientists surveyed agree that in the past 200-plus years, mean global temperatures have been rising and that human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. Of course who was this magical group of scientists? It couldn't be that they were selected based on their known views could it. Way to skew an opinion poll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 HUMAN induced or FOSSIL FUEL BURING produced? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Wasn't there something about Nero debating whether the fire was arson or natural in cause while Rome burned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Coli Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 HUMAN induced or FOSSIL FUEL BURING produced? The question was whether human activity was a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures. The climatologists were nearly unanimous, not so much for the petroleum geologists. This is one of those "debates" akin to evolution vs. creationism. Actual scientists can put out study after study saying global warming has an anthropogenic cause, and if you go to ScienceDaily or do a literature search, a set of studies supporting that view comes out just about every month. But the naysayers will always say the models aren't good or the scientists are all corrupt. Kind of like debating the creationist nuts who claim evolution is just a non-proven theory. Evolution is real. A manmade cause of global warming is real. The good science suggesting both are real still marches on no matter how loudly the few anti-evolution nuts or the few pro-oil nuts shout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 The question was whether human activity was a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures. The climatologists were nearly unanimous, not so much for the petroleum geologists. This is one of those "debates" akin to evolution vs. creationism. Actual scientists can put out study after study saying global warming has an anthropogenic cause, and if you go to ScienceDaily or do a literature search, a set of studies supporting that view comes out just about every month. But the naysayers will always say the models aren't good or the scientists are all corrupt. Kind of like debating the creationist nuts who claim evolution is just a non-proven theory. Evolution is real. A manmade cause of global warming is real. The good science suggesting both are real still marches on no matter how loudly the few anti-evolution nuts or the few pro-oil nuts shout. I haven't yet seen a single study that shows an anthropogenic cause. I have seen a slew that show an anthropogenic correlation, however. (Which, as we all know, could be due to error, much as a die roll blah blah blah true expected roll natter natter natter 3.5 yada yada yada East German scientists gromish gromish gromish truculent triceratops.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 It's all a crock that weak minded Tards fall for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 It's all a crock that weak minded Tards fall for. I just want to make clear that, just because I disagree with Coli, it does not automatically mean that I agree with this !@#$ing mongoloid here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I just want to make clear that, just because I disagree with Coli, it does not automatically mean that I agree with this !@#$ing mongoloid here. Point noted. It's tough when the idiots take your side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I just want to make clear that, just because I disagree with Coli, it does not automatically mean that I agree with this !@#$ing mongoloid here. Don't worry, nobody thinks that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Point noted. It's tough when the idiots take your side. No, no, no...he doesn't take my side. My side is that I disagree with the quality of the science for valid reasons that I can enumerate and explain. HIS side is a loud, juicy, metaphorical fart in an elevator. Our "sides" do not even coexist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Don't worry, nobody thinks that. I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 No, no, no...he doesn't take my side. My side is that I disagree with the quality of the science for valid reasons that I can enumerate and explain. HIS side is a loud, juicy, metaphorical fart in an elevator. Our "sides" do not even coexist. Indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I just want to make clear that, just because I disagree with Coli, it does not automatically mean that I agree with this !@#$ing mongoloid here. I always enjoy these Global Warming threads. But, I must say, this may be the best post in any of them. Excellence for you, good sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 No, no, no...he doesn't take my side. My side is that I disagree with the quality of the science for valid reasons that I can enumerate and explain. HIS side is a loud, juicy, metaphorical fart in an elevator. Our "sides" do not even coexist. Admit it....every now and again, a fart in an elevator is pretty !@#$ing funny. Which, it seems, if we could stop from happening...would do away with GLOBAL !@#$ING WARMING. So now we gotta sh---can fart jokes, according to the evironazis? You can have my whoopee cushion when you pry it from my cold dead hands. OK, that was lame. Im going home now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Of course who was this magical group of scientists? It couldn't be that they were selected based on their known views could it. Way to skew an opinion poll. However the results of the investigation conducted at the end of 2008 reveal that vast majority of the Earth scientists surveyed agree that in the past 200-plus years, mean global temperatures have been rising and that human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures Earth scientists? Seriously? Do you remember the kids in school who had to take Earth Science? Holy crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted January 22, 2009 Author Share Posted January 22, 2009 Of course who was this magical group of scientists? It couldn't be that they were selected based on their known views could it. Way to skew an opinion poll. Read the article first dimwit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 22, 2009 Share Posted January 22, 2009 Prominent Japanese Scientists Dispute Cause of "Climate Change" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 22, 2009 Share Posted January 22, 2009 Read the article first dimwit. I did dimwit. it was this magical group that had registered with this global warming survey. they took the poll online. Yeah online polls of a very select group of 3000 targeted scientists. That's real compelling, moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts