Jump to content

Brady or Cassel?


Recommended Posts

how did this thread get this far without the original post being BOMBARDED for it's absurdity. i am sure hamdan's revenge's dad is a hell of a good guy, but there is NO WAY IN HELL the patriots start next season with anyone other than brady at qb. i mean...unless he tears his other knee in half or something. and cassel is about to strike it rich on the OPEN MARKET. not as a franchise player.

 

i mean think about it- belichek has already turned a total nobody in brady into a hall-of-famer, and turned another nobody in cassel into a soon-to-be multi-multi-millionaire. do you think there is ANY doubt in his mind that he can't just draft another nobody and win 11 or 12 games with him whenever he needs to?

 

 

 

this place... :worthy::angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If they "FRANCHISE" him, they w/b on the hook for aprox $20-25 mil of their salary cap AT ONE POSITION! Then, of course you would trade the QB, Brady, that has absolutely made the Cheatriots what they are, which is the dominant team in the league for, I don't know, the past 5-6 years? Yea, this is a really well thought out plan. Now, they might TRANSITION him, allowing them to get something for him (Cassel) when he leaves. But leave he will. Bank on it.

By transitioning him, they can only get right of first refusal. It's either (unlikely) franchise him or (likely) let him walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how did this thread get this far without the original post being BOMBARDED for it's absurdity. i am sure hamdan's revenge's dad is a hell of a good guy, but there is NO WAY IN HELL the patriots start next season with anyone other than brady at qb. i mean...unless he tears his other knee in half or something. and cassel is about to strike it rich on the OPEN MARKET. not as a franchise player.

 

i mean think about it- belichek has already turned a total nobody in brady into a hall-of-famer, and turned another nobody in cassel into a soon-to-be multi-multi-millionaire. do you think there is ANY doubt in his mind that he can't just draft another nobody and win 11 or 12 games with him whenever he needs to?

 

 

 

this place... :wallbash::worthy:

My dad is a good guy you :angry::censored:

 

haha we were all fighting about it so i figured id ask all my informed sports fans :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Dad came up this idea while we watching football today.

 

He thinks that the Pats* will Franchise Matt Cassell during the offseason.

 

He then thinks that both Cassell AND Tom Brady will be on the Trading block and whichever QB gets the best offer will be traded.

 

My brother thinks that nobody is buying Cassell, and therefore that this cannot happen because the Pats* can't afford to pay Cassell that kind of money to do nothing. The rebuttle here is that the Pats* are really trying to move Brady for a rediculous offer i.e. 1st rd Pick for the next couple of years plus a premium player and probably some middle round picks too.

 

I think (and my Dad) that Belicheat is crazy enough to do it (trade brady) and thinks he can plug anybody into his system and get success. Cassel has won 10 games and has the pats* on the verge of a playoff trip when everyone counted them out. He has had back to back 400 yard games this year and he threw for 345 in the snow today. Somebody would make an offer for Cassel as well IMO. Plus the pats* have pulled of trades like this before (Deion Branch comes to mind)

 

Is Belicheat that arrogant and heartless to sell Brady after all that they have accomplished together?

 

 

Thoughts?

 

kinda seems like how we got Bledsoe--except for the fact the Brady is not washed up and at the end of his career

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seriously think he is arrogant enough to do it.

 

I don't know if he will, but keep it on the radar.

 

 

Me, too.

 

While I don't think BB will trade Tommy, I truly believe he will seriously consider it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is clear. You keep the better QB (Cassel). And you trade the QB who will get you the most draft picks (Brady). Yes, I know I called Cassel better than Brady, and that is because he is. Go ahead and quote NFL live commentators to tell me how wrong I am, I dont care, Cassel>Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is clear. You keep the better QB (Cassel). And you trade the QB who will get you the most draft picks (Brady). Yes, I know I called Cassel better than Brady, and that is because he is. Go ahead and quote NFL live commentators to tell me how wrong I am, I dont care, Cassel>Brady.

 

 

While that is simply silly, it might be true if Brady doesn't fully recover from his multiple surgeries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is clear. You keep the better QB (Cassel). And you trade the QB who will get you the most draft picks (Brady). Yes, I know I called Cassel better than Brady, and that is because he is. Go ahead and quote NFL live commentators to tell me how wrong I am, I dont care, Cassel>Brady.

Compare Brady last year to Cassel this year. Not even close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Tim Graham has brought this up before. To me, Cassell's performance just diminishes Tom Brady's accomplishments. I am not saying that Brady is not a great QB, but perhaps being a QB for the Patriots is like being a RB for the Broncos, a great system makes the right above average QB look awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Belichick is really as arrogant as we believe he is, he will trade BOTH Brady and Cassel in the offseason. He'll then draft Oklahoma's backup QB in the 7th round (I don't who that is, but it doesn't matter, as long has he hasn't started a game since Pop Warner) and name him starter.

 

He'll use all the first round draft picks he receives to draft tight ends and DTs (who he will move to defensive end). Somewhere in the first three rounds, he'll pick a LB that he'll start at fullback. During the draft he'll deliberately ignore running backs, preferring to sign a former Bills RB to a league-minumim contract (my guess is that it will be Omon).

 

Yep, Bellichick is that arrogant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is clear. You keep the better QB (Cassel). And you trade the QB who will get you the most draft picks (Brady). Yes, I know I called Cassel better than Brady, and that is because he is. Go ahead and quote NFL live commentators to tell me how wrong I am, I dont care, Cassel>Brady.

:angry::worthy::huh::censored:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell you what: if for some reason the Pats go deep in the playoffs, maybe make the Super Bowl or something, I can see the Cheat choosing Cassel instead of Brady. He's made that type of move before (Milloy, Bledsoe, Vinatieri, for three quick examples), and he's been successful, so he won't be shy about doing it again (whether or not it ultimately proves to be a good move). Plus, the Cheat will have information about Brady's health that no one else will have.

 

Without a deep playoff run, forget it. Brady will return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pats will tag Cassell knowing that they'll have as many as 10 serious suitors for Cassell's services. With so many teams in dire need of a top QB the Pats won't have to worry about having all of them "wait them out". You'll see a bunch of QB needy (read lousy and unattractive to play for) teams jumping up to the head of the line so that they don't miss out on the opportunity of getting hold of Cassell before he's free and clear to sign with more attractive teams.

 

My guess is the Pats will trade Cassell to the Lions for the #1 overall pick in the 2009 draft. Or some combo of similar value spread out over a couple years

 

If you are the Lions and are thinking about taking either QB Bradford or Stafford 1st overall and then paying one of them the money that the 1st overall gets (ie. 6 years, $70 million, with $35 million in guarantees) then you'd be crazy not to jump all over an already proven, very good and experienced NFL QB like Cassell instead of taking a huge gamble on an unproven college kid who will not likely pay dividends for some time. Cassell will step in and start and be a top QB right away. Very few rookie QB's do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pats will tag Cassell knowing that they'll have as many as 10 serious suitors for Cassell's services. With so many teams in dire need of a top QB the Pats won't have to worry about having all of them "wait them out". You'll see a bunch of QB needy (read lousy and unattractive to play for) teams jumping up to the head of the line so that they don't miss out on the opportunity of getting hold of Cassell before he's free and clear to sign with more attractive teams.

 

My guess is the Pats will trade Cassell to the Lions for the #1 overall pick in the 2009 draft.

 

If you are the Lions and are thinking about taking either QB Bradford or Stafford 1st overall and then paying one of them the money that the 1st overall gets (ie. 6 years, $70 million, with $35 million in guarantees) then you'd be crazy not to jump all over an already proven, very good and experienced NFL QB like Cassell instead of taking a huge gamble on an unproven college kid.

Cassel (one "l") is far from proven and won't have the likes of Moss and Welker to throw to, much less the Pats' O-line, much less their rushing attack, in Detroit. That will be taken into account when teams (read: Detroit) weigh whether they want to spend $14M a year and a huge signing bonus on him. And most likely, they won't, regardless of what a QB picked 1st overall pick would get (if that were any consideration, the Raiders would have traded their 1st rounder overall for Matt Schaub in 2007). And the only comparison is with the 1st overall pick, since after that the contracts are WELL below what a franchise player would demand, as Cassel's agent surely will if he's franchised.

 

And besides, do you think that the Pats would trade for the 1st overall and have to pay that amount of money? No way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And besides, do you think that the Pats would trade for the 1st overall and have to pay that amount of money? No way.

 

 

If the Pats* traded for a #1 pick, they would likely deal that for more picks, or a player and picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...