Gisele Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 I'm going to bed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 What did they do specifically that you thought was horrible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macdaddy Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Go for it on 4-1 early Fake a punt on your own 20 w/ the game NOT on the line (subsequently having to use your challenge) Use 3 time outs because you couldn't get the play in Blow a timeout on a ridiculous challenge. Not to mention the horrible play calling all game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantstopbeastmode Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 If anyone thinks our coaching the past few games isn't completely terrible then they are wrong. You simply cannot defend it. Its terrible. I hate to say it but Jauron has no clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Go for it on 4-1 earlyFake a punt on your own 20 w/ the game NOT on the line (subsequently having to use your challenge) Use 3 time outs because you couldn't get the play in Blow a timeout on a ridiculous challenge. Not to mention the horrible play calling all game I had no problems going for it. I always want to and we normally don't. I know a lot of people do too, it was interesting to see a little bit of a ballsy decision like that. If you have quarrels for the play, then you may have a point, but there was nothing wrong with that decision. The fake punt was actually successful, and while it was awful, and took a lot of energy out of the players as it dragged on for ever in review, to be honest, they caught them off guard, and Moorman picked it up, and it was a phantom-call away from continuing the most important drive a football game (the start of the second half). IMO, that decision was shocking, but made a statement that they were pissed and wanted points. That play had no repercussions. The challenge was awful and just solidifies my previous assessment that we might not actually have a credible person in the booth reviewing these things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 If anyone thinks our coaching the past few games isn't completely terrible then they are wrong. You simply cannot defend it. Its terrible. I hate to say it but Jauron has no clue. The coaches the past few games has not been completely terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantstopbeastmode Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 I had no problems going for it. I always want to and we normally don't. I know a lot of people do too, it was interesting to see a little bit of a ballsy decision like that. If you have quarrels for the play, then you may have a point, but there was nothing wrong with that decision. The fake punt was actually successful, and while it was awful, and took a lot of energy out of the players as it dragged on for ever in review, to be honest, they caught them off guard, and Moorman picked it up, and it was a phantom-call away from continuing the most important drive a football game (the start of the second half). IMO, that decision was shocking, but made a statement that they were pissed and wanted points. That play had no repercussions. The challenge was awful and just solidifies my previous assessment that we might not actually have a credible person in the booth reviewing these things. Just to clarify my statement, I agree with what you are saying. The overall scheme of Bills football is what loses us the game, not going for it on 4th and 1... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 What did they do specifically that you thought was horrible? Why can't they get the offensive plays into the huddle on time? It seemed like Trent was coming to line with 10 seconds or less every time and if there was any motion or the Jets were showing different looks, the snap was rushed. That resulted in the fake snap by Preston right before the Pick 6 and other plays that just looked out of sync. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Why can't they get the offensive plays into the huddle on time? It seemed like Trent was coming to line with 10 seconds or less every time and if there was any motion or the Jets were showing different looks, the snap was rushed. That resulted in the fake snap by Preston right before the Pick 6 and other plays that just looked out of sync. That's more because the Offense is not run by Trent Edwards. There are plenty of other teams that take their time calling-plays, if that's all you can come up with, you're probably complaining about the wrong thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stenbar Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 The coaches the past few games has not been completely terrible. The offensive philosphy this team is using is killing them..You have to stick to the running game and give it a chance..2 weeks in a row they have gotten worse..Let the big boys attack instead of protect....That is coaching and it has been putrid.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Wheels Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 And when a team self-immolates because of turnovers and poor execution, then the coaches didn't do a very good job of preparing the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 The offensive philosphy this team is using is killing them..You have to stick to the running game and give it a chance..2 weeks in a row they have gotten worse..Let the big boys attack instead of protect....That is coaching and it has been putrid.. You're not making any sense. You're saying to keep running, but it's not working. There are arguments for why the team has been "putrid," but to say the coaches have been because the run is not working really makes no sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stenbar Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 You're not making any sense. You're saying to keep running, but it's not working. There are arguments for why the team has been "putrid," but to say the coaches have been because the run is not working really makes no sense to me. How many times did they run the ball today? Our oline if nothing else is large..If you dont think that after 30 minutes of them hitting you wont take a toll on a defense then you dont watch football..I understand they run for 2 yards a pop today but they stopped trying..You cant do that and win games....I use to watch Riggins run for 2 and 3 yards all day then in the 4th quarter he rushes for 6o yards..Why? Because there large great oline beat up on defenses all day..They didnt blow people out they stayed close till the end when their running game took its toll..Marshawn needs 25 - 30 carries a game..He is lucky to get 12..They have to stick with it..Besides that is it easier to run forward or backward? Now weigh in at 330 and play 3 quarters of your time on the field ruinning backwards with someone hitting you..It takes a toll on the oline instead of the defense..It sucks to watch a team gain no yards running but in the end you have to keep at it..Mix it up at the least..I saw numerous times today they went pass all series..You cant do that and win.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Go for it on 4-1 earlyFake a punt on your own 20 w/ the game NOT on the line (subsequently having to use your challenge) Use 3 time outs because you couldn't get the play in Blow a timeout on a ridiculous challenge. Not to mention the horrible play calling all game If they make it on 4th and one then Jauron's a genius. The fake punt would've worked except for a penalty. People B word about the play calling be too conservative and then complain when the calling isn't conservative enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantstopbeastmode Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Our defensive playbook is about 3 plays deep. Favre, Warner, Rivers, and Pennington have had no problem figuring that out. Our offensive strategy wastes about 40% of our plays running into a brick wall, hoping we can convert on 3rd downs. If we tried getting the 1st down on all 3 plays, maybe we would get more 1st downs. How can you think our philosophy has been good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Yeah...we have a big O-line... We moved the ball well despite abandoning the run, we just hit a very disheartening turnover in the second quarter that was a 10 point minimum turnaround. Because of this we played catch up. When you're playing catch-up against the 4th best run defense in the league, you have two options. You can pass and try to accumulate yards and points fast, or you can slowly attempt to establish the run, late in the game and pray your O-line does stuff it hasn't been able to do. Now, most of the time you can wear down the D. But 2 yard gains times 3 = 6 yards. I don't know why you would plug away at what wasn't there. I think we should run the ball more if we can. In this game however, I understand their decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 If they make it on 4th and one then Jauron's a genius. The fake punt would've worked except for a penalty. People B word about the play calling be too conservative and then complain when the calling isn't conservative enough. agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynical Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 I had no problems going for it. I always want to and we normally don't. I know a lot of people do too, it was interesting to see a little bit of a ballsy decision like that. If you have quarrels for the play, then you may have a point, but there was nothing wrong with that decision. The fake punt was actually successful, and while it was awful, and took a lot of energy out of the players as it dragged on for ever in review, to be honest, they caught them off guard, and Moorman picked it up, and it was a phantom-call away from continuing the most important drive a football game (the start of the second half). IMO, that decision was shocking, but made a statement that they were pissed and wanted points. That play had no repercussions. The challenge was awful and just solidifies my previous assessment that we might not actually have a credible person in the booth reviewing these things. Phantom call? That looked like a pretty clear cut case of holding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 If anyone thinks our coaching the past few games isn't completely terrible then they are wrong. You simply cannot defend it. Its terrible. I hate to say it but Jauron has no clue. The Bills moved the ball all day and shut the Jets down for the most part. They lost because of turnovers and a talent deficiency on the offensive line (Preston and Whittle stink). That's hardly the coaches' fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Phantom call? That looked like a pretty clear cut case of holding. I consider all non-blatant holding calls "phantom-calls" because its all the discretion of he referee's mood. He clearly did not want us to get a first down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts