Chilly Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 http://gawker.com/5030531/dead-monster-was...hore-in-montauk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 fake! -everyone on the internet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 I was reading thru the comments and somebody else picked up the same thing I did..... Is the demon flipping off the camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted July 29, 2008 Author Share Posted July 29, 2008 I agree with some of the comments - Cloverfield 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 I was reading thru the comments and somebody else picked up the same thing I did..... Is the demon flipping off the camera? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 i heard this is the cloverfield 2 monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Demon spawn, the other white meat.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 That is a chicken, plucked and rotting and bloaty...and flipping off the camera...nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Turtle without the shell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Turtle without the shell? excellent call. I thought chicken, but your guess is much better. Now the question, is it Corey Feldman's love child? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 That is a chicken, plucked and rotting and bloaty...and flipping off the camera...nice. Turtle without the shell? What kind of freaky ass zoo's do you people go to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 I agree with some of the comments - Cloverfield 2 SHHHHHHHH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted July 30, 2008 Author Share Posted July 30, 2008 SHHHHHHHH! I KNEW IT! This guy washes up in Iraq doesn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 The research facility referred to in the article is Plum Island which is not too far away from where I live. We go fishing in that vicinity all the time Plum Island Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGimp Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 I think it's one of Willis McGahee's kids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 I think it's one of Willis McGahee's kids I see the resemblance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerjamhead Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 http://gawker.com/5030531/dead-monster-was...hore-in-montauk When did a dead alien wash up on shore? I must have been away from my computer that day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 Unshelled turtle seems to be the best answer. Of course government created monster for the amusement of the scientists is a close second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 Unshelled turtle seems to be the best answer. Of course government created monster for the amusement of the scientists is a close second. i dont think turtles have complete, skinned bodies under their shells. id go with some viral marketing campaign. Where the Wild Things Are comes out pretty soon i believe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 i dont think turtles have complete, skinned bodies under their shells. id go with some viral marketing campaign. Where the Wild Things Are comes out pretty soon i believe They also don't look ANYTHING AT ALL LIKE WHAT'S IN THE PICTURE!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 i dont think turtles have complete, skinned bodies under their shells. id go with some viral marketing campaign. Where the Wild Things Are comes out pretty soon i believe Is that supposed to be more of an adult movie or a childrens movie? I'm assuming its based off the book, which was a childrens book, so I don't know why a movie studio would do something like this for a childrens book I'm leaning more towards Cloverfield 2, and that its supposed to be either the parasite like creature that falls off of it, or a baby of the acutual creature. As for what it was that was used to make it, a dead turtle with its shell removed is my best guess. It has the face of a turtle, and the smaller legs, although it is also probably just a fake they created in a special effects studio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 Is that supposed to be more of an adult movie or a childrens movie? I'm assuming its based off the book, which was a childrens book, so I don't know why a movie studio would do something like this for a childrens book I'm leaning more towards Cloverfield 2, and that its supposed to be either the parasite like creature that falls off of it, or a baby of the acutual creature. As for what it was that was used to make it, a dead turtle with its shell removed is my best guess. It has the face of a turtle, and the smaller legs, although it is also probably just a fake they created in a special effects studio it is DEFINITELY NOT A TURTLE. turtle's shells are part of their skeletal system. they are basically hollow inside. there isnt a complete, skinned animal hanging out inside a turtle shell. Where the Wild Things Are is going to be a Spike Jonez movie adapted from the book. from the preview I saw, it is pretty surreal. I wouldnt exactly call it a "kids movie". according to a lot of digg.com users (where the article is linked) that pic is of a decomposing otter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 Photoshopped the head on the body of a hairless dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 Is that supposed to be more of an adult movie or a childrens movie? I'm assuming its based off the book, which was a childrens book, so I don't know why a movie studio would do something like this for a childrens book I'm leaning more towards Cloverfield 2, and that its supposed to be either the parasite like creature that falls off of it, or a baby of the acutual creature. As for what it was that was used to make it, a dead turtle with its shell removed is my best guess. It has the face of a turtle, and the smaller legs, although it is also probably just a fake they created in a special effects studio It's definitely NOT a baby Clover. That much I can say for certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts