Fewell733 Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 in some ways they have a point about the media - the Pats get lots of coverage, so they get extensive public praise and criticism. The Bills barely get any mention at all, positive or negative. Actually I've encountered a few "good" Pats fans that have a very good knowledge of the game - it's too bad they're drowned out by bandwagon tards. And regardless, their team is evil incarnate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 I did find this funny. Considering what they did to the Bills last year If Buffalo keeps gaining on us like this, I predict that they will manage to lose to us by only single digits within three seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 FORMER TBD POSTER ALERT! Check out the last poster on the bottom of page six. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 EDITOR'S NOTE: I only read the Patsy* thread cited here, but I was struck by how often they all refer to their "dynasty." It dawned on me that for all the time I spend listening and reading about the NFL, they are the ONLY ones who refer to the P*triots as a dynasty any more. Talking heads still suck their nuts, but you never hear them referred to as a "dynasty" by anyone who isn't a fan of theirs. Dynasties don't lose Superbowls. Green Bay of the 60s, Pitt of 70s, 49ers of 80s, Cowboys of 90s - none lost Superbowls. Not only that, a dynasty is usually extremely dominant, even in the Super Bowl. They don't have to resort to clutch kicks as time runs off the clock, because they are a dynasty and have blown out the opponent before half time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperKillerRobots Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 It's easy to win when you cheat though. Truth is though, that board looks like ours, just the Pats version, lol. The first post is infuriating. I like how they make fun of each other for bad grammar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 FORMER TBD POSTER ALERT! Check out the last poster on the bottom of page six. please...don't give that dude any attention...that is what he craves...just observe how well respected he is there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndZoneCrew Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 FORMER TBD POSTER ALERT! Check out the last poster on the bottom of page six. Man...I had some battles with that douchebag! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted April 29, 2008 Author Share Posted April 29, 2008 I'll be curious to see how "invincible" the Pats will be now that everyone is wise to the cheating ways. If they go 8-8 that'll tell me a lot. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 I'll be curious to see how "invincible" the Pats will be now that everyone is wise to the cheating ways. If they go 8-8 that'll tell me a lot. PTR PTR, I hate the Pats as much as the next guy, but they did go 18-0 last season, I THINK without cheating..LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted April 29, 2008 Author Share Posted April 29, 2008 PTR, I hate the Pats as much as the next guy, but they did go 18-0 last season, I THINK without cheating..LOL The Pats always seem to make the "right" play at the right time. Considering what is coming out, I have to believe they did much more than just tape defensive signals. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fewell733 Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 they score too many points to only go 8-8, even with a total defensive collapse they'll still probably go at least 10-6, and probably better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Indablanc Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Promo...I fear your thread title and message are missing the appropriate use of the asterisk. I love the new rules. Eliminations prior to the start of the season. Another one bites the dust. (Too bad. I like PTR) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKC Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Dynasties don't lose Superbowls. Green Bay of the 60s, Pitt of 70s, 49ers of 80s, Cowboys of 90s - none lost Superbowls. Correctly applied, a "dynasty" would only refer to a team who had won under successive coaching staffs and/or successive owners. The term is not appropriate where the coaching staff/owners are unchanged. The Cowboys could make the claim because the coaching staff changed, but the *s are not a dynasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChevyVanMiller Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Not to pick any bones with SI, but wasn't Poz a 2nd rounder last year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 I love the new rules. Eliminations prior to the start of the season. Another one bites the dust. (Too bad. I like PTR) Okay, Deputy Fife, you're just jonesin' for that dinner, aren't ya? Rules is rules. But this one could be hard to keep track of for the next eight months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 FORMER TBD POSTER ALERT! Check out the last poster on the bottom of page six. read some of his other posts, here's a classic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 read some of his other posts, here's a classic Cute. He was specifically banned from the Range because he accused me of driving Paul to kill himself. I hope his selective memory helps him sleep at night, the !@#$ing piece of sh--. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Surprisingly, some of those posters were quite kind to the talent on the Bills roster.... It will be hard enough to pry the division away from the Pats... but what I worry about is ALL the competition in the AFC.... This team would be better off in the NFC... I hope we can win 1 out of 2 against NE, but the wild card is going to be a very tough race... Here are the teams that will most likely contend in the AFC: NE, Indy, Jax, Tenn, SD, Pitt, Cle... and I think Den. and possibly Hou. will be on the cusp... that's 9 teams, not considering any surprises, that will probably at least contend... Buffalo will have to be on its "A" game with minimal injuries and an improved Trent Edwards to even begin to chisel away at the brick wall in front of them... Call that a cynical opinion if you like.... I call it reality... You call that reality? Maybe your reality. Sit right back and I'll tell you a tale about Trent's Reality. Trent Edwards' reality is one of hitting receivers in stride as they gallop to the endzone. It's a reality of throwing the ball all 'round the yard and slingin the hash. A reality of domination... pounding divisional opponents into submission. A reality of perrenial Pro Bowls culminating in a path to the Hall of Fame in stately Canton, OH. This is a reality that ends in a march on Niagara Square to celebrate our championships. And that... is reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 They need something to take their minds off that fact that they cheer for a team that cheats. If they are not careful they could just lose their 4th SB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 I hope his selective memory helps him sleep at night The selective memory helps, but when it comes to a good night's sleep, I'm sure he mostly relies on the three packs of Ho-Hos he has as a little "time to go nightie-nite" snack he has before retiring for the evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts