DC Tom Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 What limited history are you talking about? The limited, half-hour history of Ed's awareness of hockey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU5781 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 The limited, half-hour history of Ed's awareness of hockey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 The limited, half-hour history of Ed's awareness of hockey. Half an hour? I think you're giving him way too much credit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Isles with an injured starting goalie is probably the best senario. But everyone is 0-0 now so you never know. Can't wait till Thursday!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Isles with an injured starting goalie is probably the best senario. But everyone is 0-0 now so you never know.Can't wait till Thursday!!! Indeed. A little humility (except for when dealing with Ed regarding the Devils) is in order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Great...but are you going to elaborate on your limited history remark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Great...but are you going to elaborate on your limited history remark? Ed rolls his eyes more than a chick on the view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU5781 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Ed rolls his eyes more than a chick on the view. I would ask if it turned you on, but I'm over the age of 15, so the answer is obviously no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU5781 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Great...but are you going to elaborate on your limited history remark? How many cups/playoff experience does this roster actually have Jimmy? Thought so. For that matter, how many cups do the Sabres actually have? Yeah again, thought so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Give it up, man. And worry about the Lightning first. They were 3-1 against your Devils this past season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 How many cups/playoff experience does this roster actually have Jimmy? Thought so.For that matter, how many cups do the Sabres actually have? Yeah again, thought so. Nice argument again this year, bandwaggoner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 How many cups/playoff experience does this roster actually have Jimmy? Thought so.For that matter, how many cups do the Sabres actually have? Yeah again, thought so. Yes since we all know that previous championships = future championships. Exactly the reason why the Carolina Hurricanes won the cup last year. You moron. Oh and good job wiht the 15 year old joke. You notice I was able to insult you pretty consistently without referring to the tried tested and true joke of your !@#$ing gay car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU5781 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Nice argument again this year, bandwaggoner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU5781 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Yes since we all know that previous championships = future championships. The history Mr. Qunitana, the history. The Devils have been through it MANY times, with MANY of the same players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 The history Mr. Qunitana, the history. The Devils have been through it MANY times, with MANY of the same players. The old slow guys, that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU5781 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 The old slow guys, that is. Those old, slow guys managed to beat your Sabres twice this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Those old, slow guys managed to beat your Sabres twice this year. Again, Mr Bandwagon, which of those 2 defeats should Sabre fans worry about? The one where the Sabres were outplaying them until the 3rd and your team was awarded a goal by the refs and then immediately followed it up with a fluke goal, or the one where they were running out of gas with the AHL team up on the roster? Might you want to worry about either of the 2 where the Sabres dominated play, or the one the Sabres were dominating prior to the fluke goal? Be afraid. Be very afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 How many cups/playoff experience does this roster actually have Jimmy? Thought so.For that matter, how many cups do the Sabres actually have? Yeah again, thought so. What the hell does past stanley cups have to do with the current teams you nimrod? Thought so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Those old, slow guys managed to beat your Sabres twice this year. They also lost to the Sabres when it was REALLY important. Can you imagine these geezers having to play game after game against the Sabres? Not a pretty image, is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 But everyone is 0-0 now so you never know. Not the Devils. They have history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts