Ramius Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 we'll be grilling and watching the game...go oil!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Excellent response. Really. Tell you what. The next time I see a thread asking if I'm doing something like, oh, watching a hockey game, I'll go through my Taterhill Posting Requirements Checklist Ver. 2006 before responding because, let's face it, we wouldn't want to annoy you. 710597[/snapback] Better yet: just mention cowbell. He loves that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 I have an idea. Go to a hockey board and discuss hockey so we don't have to be subjected to your pathetic "Oh, I'm a Sabres fan again now that they're winning" threads. Or is it possible that if you go to a hockey board they will realize you only started cheering for the team again this year? 710571[/snapback] You misspelled "Canes" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Better yet: just mention cowbell. He loves that. 710600[/snapback] Dear Sir, Your post has been found in violation of TPRC-V.2006 Section 4, Paragraph 3 in which it is annoying, not funny, and irrelevant to the priorities set forth by TPRC-V.2006. Please cease and desist from providing any further comment without approvel from the committee. Respectfully, TPRC-V.2006 Review Committee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartshan-83 Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 I'll probably tune in. Good sports is good sports, man. Game 7 of anything is okay in my book....whether or not I am an avid fan of the sport or teams involved doesn't really matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catholic Guilt Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Excellent response. Really. Tell you what. The next time I see a thread asking if I'm doing something like, oh, watching a hockey game, I'll go through my Taterhill Posting Requirements Checklist Ver. 2006 before responding because, let's face it, we wouldn't want to annoy you. And it's much easier for us to pay attention to your requirements than it is, apparently, for you to spend any amount of effort ignoring responses you don't like. I offer my sincerest apologies on behalf of all of us who post comments that don't meet the TPRC-V.2006 approval requirements. 710597[/snapback] Thanks for your input smart ass. You got to flex your internet muscles. Congrats man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Excellent response. Really. Tell you what. The next time I see a thread asking if I'm doing something like, oh, watching a hockey game, I'll go through my Taterhill Posting Requirements Checklist Ver. 2006 before responding because, let's face it, we wouldn't want to annoy you. And it's much easier for us to pay attention to your requirements than it is, apparently, for you to spend any amount of effort ignoring responses you don't like. I offer my sincerest apologies on behalf of all of us who post comments that don't meet the TPRC-V.2006 approval requirements. 710597[/snapback] that is an excellent idea...actually....now that I think about it...it is nuts that that Buffalo fans get excited about a Stanley Cup run...what in the hell were we thinking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LewPort71 Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Rockpile > The only thing you need to add to your post is that your wife had a Corona ready for you also... Great song by Talking Heads, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Definition of a messageboard. A place where men react like women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Definition of a messageboard. A place where men react like women. 710753[/snapback] And how would you know what a woman would react like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 And how would you know what a woman would react like? 710787[/snapback] Well first clue, to nitpick everything someone else says. Sounds like a chick to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Anyone else absolutely HATE that woman's rendition of both anthems? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Definition of a messageboard. A place where men react like women. 710753[/snapback] Oh, the irony... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 1-0 'Caines.......wow, that was quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Oh, the irony... 710801[/snapback] Yaya I know, I do the same sh--. It's just easier to realize when you see someone else doing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Is the game worth watching? It's pretty obvious the game is slanted towards Carolina. I've seen a couple of trips, a couple of interference plays, and a crosscheck that aren't being called against the Canes. The only call was the blatant killing of the goalie. Ridiculous. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Is the game worth watching? It's pretty obvious the game is slanted towards Carolina. I've seen a couple of trips, a couple of interference plays, and a crosscheck that aren't being called against the Canes. The only call was the blatant killing of the goalie. Ridiculous. CW 710805[/snapback] I love all you conspiracy theorists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 I love all you conspiracy theorists. 710807[/snapback] I saw Bush talking to the ref before the game. Bush=Bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Is the game worth watching? It's pretty obvious the game is slanted towards Carolina. I've seen a couple of trips, a couple of interference plays, and a crosscheck that aren't being called against the Canes. The only call was the blatant killing of the goalie. Ridiculous. CW 710805[/snapback] The officials are reverting to the old "we're not going to decide the game" thing. It's to be expected. I wouldn't say it's slanted toward either team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 I love all you conspiracy theorists. 710807[/snapback] Not a conspiracy theory, just a fact. I'm not saying that the refs want the game to go a certain way. But they're sure not calling anything.. Scratch that, they're calling a penalty against Edmonton. Maybe it IS a conspiracy theory. Of course, I don't relaly want to see Peca get his name on the cup, so I don't care either way. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts