Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: knives out. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ar-AA1REXql The Pentagon, facing questions about its legal basis for attacking civilian vessels, sent no lawyers to the meeting — a move multiple lawmakers in the room considered inexplicable. The Defense Department officials who did attend, those people said, were unable to explain the mission’s strategy and scope — even as President Donald Trump openly mused about expanding the campaign to include land targets inside Venezuela. What is really going on here?
nedboy7 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago On 12/2/2025 at 6:34 AM, Wolfgang said: Nonsense about contacting reps? Are you a British subject or a US citizen who has the right to petition their government? Just because you are submissive to the whims of the state, doesn't mean that others are... As for random links, how do you know there isn't malicious malware imbedded? That's right you don't... As for the boats... What laws were broken? Statutes? Are you that brain dead and lazy that you can't use your own words? You post a link? You can't simply copy paste the specific laws that were allegedly broken? As for the Geneva Convention, what authority do they have over the UCMJ? Which authority is higher? I'm going to revisit this subject here in January and have a big laugh revisiting the stupidity of you and many others... Merry Christmas and Happy New Year until I get back from my vacation next month... Maybe you need some FoxyNewsss “It gives me no pleasure to say what I’m about to say, because I worked with Pete Hegseth for seven or eight years at Fox News,” Napolitano said on Tuesday. “This is an act of a war crime, ordering survivors who the law requires be rescued instead to be murdered, there’s absolutely no legal basis for it.” 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: What is really going on here? i think no lawyers = no legal justification. You? It's a shocker but trump defied the constitution. Edited 11 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever
pennstate10 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago On 12/1/2025 at 3:15 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: The Geneva convention does not apply to drug runners, but I have a very serious question for you, why do you fight to ensure every evil criminal has full protections from their actions but the innocent people they kill you don't care about? Quote today from the dear leader “This is war”.
nedboy7 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 9 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: Quote today from the dear leader “This is war”. They desperately need a war. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: i think no lawyers = no legal justification. You? It's a shocker but trump defied the constitution. But why? Why are they doing any of this? Is it a shakedown of Maduro or something?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: But why? Why are they doing any of this? Is it a shakedown of Maduro or something? oil https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/how-a-win-in-venezuela-could-be-great-news-for-trump/ar-AA1Rk8Qa Edited 11 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago hmmm... https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5631738-us-military-strikes-drug-boat/
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago 37 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: hmmm... https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5631738-us-military-strikes-drug-boat/ “Adm. Bradley made the correct decision to ultimately sink the boat and eliminate the threat. He sunk the boat, sunk the boat and eliminated the threat,” Hegseth said Tuesday at the White House. “And it was the right call. We have his back.” 😩 2
Orlando Buffalo Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago The amount of effort to defend the narco terrorists by some people here is astounding to me. The fact that not one of you had any issues when Obama was killing terrorists over in the Middle East while having collateral damage but this is where you draw the line tells me that your TDS is out of control. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: The amount of effort to defend the narco terrorists by some people here is astounding to me. The fact that not one of you had any issues when Obama was killing terrorists over in the Middle East while having collateral damage but this is where you draw the line tells me that your TDS is out of control. I'm defending the constitution and the rule of law. It wasn't that long ago that these were republican slogans. As for Obama, the legal questions are similar. I guess less were appalled because it involved known military terrorist groups in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia. I think most people felt they were a true threat to the country. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: The amount of effort to defend the narco terrorists by some people here is astounding to me. The fact that not one of you had any issues when Obama was killing terrorists over in the Middle East while having collateral damage but this is where you draw the line tells me that your TDS is out of control. President Trump pardoned the narco kingpin. That's defending narco people, right?
SCBills Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I'm defending the constitution and the rule of law. It wasn't that long ago that these were republican slogans. As for Obama, the legal questions are similar. I guess less were appalled because it involved known military terrorist groups in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia. I think most people felt they were a true threat to the country. Less were appalled because the media didnt cover, one tenth to the degree they are covering this, Obama drone bombing the Middle East into oblivion. Maybe if Trump bombs a wedding flotilla off the coast of Venezuela, you can pretend it’s no big deal.
Homelander Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago On 12/2/2025 at 10:07 PM, SCBills said: This topic falls under the category of “not entirely comfortable with all this but also don’t care”. It’s wild that Democrats constantly find themselves going so over the top to defend criminals and drug traffickers though. At some point yall will actually defend American citizens who follow our laws, yes? lmao
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 33 minutes ago, SCBills said: Less were appalled because the media didnt cover, one tenth to the degree they are covering this, Obama drone bombing the Middle East into oblivion. Maybe if Trump bombs a wedding flotilla off the coast of Venezuela, you can pretend it’s no big deal. i rarely watch Fox but I bet they did. Well isn't that convenient? https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5630177-caribbean-boat-strikes-controversy/ Edited 8 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago facts https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna51639807 1
nedboy7 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: facts https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna51639807 Random links!!!?!? 😱 1
B-Man Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago The easiest way to find out what's really happening is to see who's leading the opposition. It's always a dead giveaway.
Recommended Posts