JDHillFan Posted September 22 Posted September 22 Just now, Roundybout said: Did you pay tribute to the Trump Bitcoin Statue yet? This is how people can tell you just sh*t all over yourself. Not clever, edgy, witty, or interesting. Just dumb. 2
SCBills Posted September 22 Posted September 22 (edited) Watching yesterday’s memorial and contrasting it with clips yesterday from Ilhan Omar and other leftist leaders .. there could not be a more illuminating contrast between the two political ideologies and their visions for the future of America. Not every Democrat ascribes to the vison of the far left, but that is the end game for that party. It’s the ideology fueling and pulling that party. And very clearly, what we saw yesterday, is the ideology driving the new right.. especially amongst those under 40. Edited September 22 by SCBills 1
B-Man Posted September 22 Posted September 22 FTA The memorial was overwhelmingly a religious, not political, event. Thus, the climax came when Erika said that she forgave her husband’s murderer, as Jesus forgave those who crucified him. It was a moment of extraordinary emotional and intellectual power. But, speaking for myself, I will never forgive the liberals who created the conditions for the murder of Charlie Kirk, and many other evils. Following Erika, President Trump’s contribution was adequate but anti-climactic. The highlight was when, after he was done speaking, he and Erika hugged. She was the star of the day, not Donald. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/09/the-charlie-kirk-memorial.php#google_vignette
Royale with Cheese Posted September 22 Posted September 22 16 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why would he? The issues he fought against were predominantly in America. That would be like us mourning the Queen. Again, he was also limited by the technology of his era. Can you imagine if he had the internet? And here you are ending with a strawman argument that has nothing to do with Kirk. Of course his issues were technology. But that doesn't discount that Kirk was bigger. Just like 75 years from now, they'll be someone bigger than Kirk. That's how it works. Was MLK bigger than Benjamin Franklin just because he could reach more of an audience with the television and radio? But yes, as you said it. MLK's issues were predominantly America. Kirk's issues he fought for affected the world. So yes, you said it as well...Kirk was bigger. 19 minutes ago, Roundybout said: So popular that people are losing their jobs for not mourning sufficiently? Nope. That is not the proper way to word it and you know it. You don't have to mourn, you just don't have to be vile. And you know it. And don't bring First Amendment into this.
SCBills Posted September 22 Posted September 22 1 minute ago, B-Man said: FTA The memorial was overwhelmingly a religious, not political, event. Thus, the climax came when Erika said that she forgave her husband’s murderer, as Jesus forgave those who crucified him. It was a moment of extraordinary emotional and intellectual power. But, speaking for myself, I will never forgive the liberals who created the conditions for the murder of Charlie Kirk, and many other evils. Following Erika, President Trump’s contribution was adequate but anti-climactic. The highlight was when, after he was done speaking, he and Erika hugged. She was the star of the day, not Donald. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/09/the-charlie-kirk-memorial.php#google_vignette Yes, but when every member of the cabinet is proclaiming Jesus and the entire ethos of the right for millennials and Gen Z is to reject the world and embrace Jesus, family, having children.. Yesterday was the beginning of the new right, post-Trump. He was almost a sidenote yesterday. Overshadowed by the movement. And that movement is a rejection of the world and an embrace of God and purpose. So, while not explicitly political, it was the birth of the post-Trump right - driven by a new generation of leaders. 1
JDHillFan Posted September 22 Posted September 22 1 minute ago, SCBills said: it was the birth of the post-Trump right - driven by a new generation of leaders I’ll be glad when it actually gets here. 1
SCBills Posted September 22 Posted September 22 Just now, JDHillFan said: I’ll be glad when it actually gets here. Agreed. I can appreciate some elements of Trump, but tbh.. I watched a lot of the Memorial and Rubio, Vance & Erika Kirk were incredible .. and then Trump came out and I just lost interest. He seemed almost out of place.. and it was very clear we were seeing the vision for the right after he leaves office. 1 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 22 Posted September 22 55 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: That is not what he said. You're intentionally being ignorant. He said ALL pilots had to get the shot but didn't say ALL pilots have heart damage. You know it but you're doing it on purpose. No, you are wrong, or just lying. He said what I quoted
Royale with Cheese Posted September 22 Posted September 22 4 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: No, you are wrong, or just lying. He said what I quoted You're doing it on purpose. Just like you're avoiding my capital murder question on purpose. You don't grow when you are this stubborn. Anyone with reasonable intelligence understands this but won't if you put a narrative above logical thinking. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 22 Posted September 22 Just now, Royale with Cheese said: You're doing it on purpose. Just like you're avoiding my capital murder question on purpose. You don't grow when you are this stubborn. Anyone with reasonable intelligence understands this but won't if you put a narrative above logical thinking. He said what I said he said, hello?? You are either lying or just being deliberately obtuse Right at 1:00 minute mark, "the vaccine has done heart damage to all the pilots" 😩
Royale with Cheese Posted September 22 Posted September 22 4 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: He said what I said he said, hello?? You are either lying or just being deliberately obtuse Right at 1:00 minute mark, "the vaccine has done heart damage to all the pilots" 😩 Yes, you're right. He didn't hear the "all" when he covered his mouth. So, yes, I can admit it. Since I'm being authentic, why don't you be? Answer my question about the capital murder of Tyler Robinson. Don't pretend like you forgot either, I've called you out on it like 3 times now and you're just avoiding it. Remember the word authentic?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 22 Posted September 22 25 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: And don't bring First Amendment into this. don't invoke the 1st to discuss the 1st. wow, profound...and scary. 1 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 22 Posted September 22 3 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Yes, you're right. He didn't hear the "all" when he covered his mouth. So, yes, I can admit it. Since I'm being authentic, why don't you be? Answer my question about the capital murder of Tyler Robinson. Don't pretend like you forgot either, I've called you out on it like 3 times now and you're just avoiding it. Remember the word authentic? Thanks. And I didn't forget your question, I just never read it, so nothing to forget. 😇 You may re-submit if you like
Roundybout Posted September 22 Posted September 22 28 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Of course his issues were technology. But that doesn't discount that Kirk was bigger. Just like 75 years from now, they'll be someone bigger than Kirk. That's how it works. Was MLK bigger than Benjamin Franklin just because he could reach more of an audience with the television and radio? But yes, as you said it. MLK's issues were predominantly America. Kirk's issues he fought for affected the world. So yes, you said it as well...Kirk was bigger. Nope. That is not the proper way to word it and you know it. You don't have to mourn, you just don't have to be vile. And you know it. And don't bring First Amendment into this. That’s a good question/counterpoint. I’d actually have to think about it.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 22 Posted September 22 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: don't invoke the 1st to discuss the 1st. wow, profound...and scary. Show me proof the First Amendment protects employers. 14 minutes ago, Roundybout said: That’s a good question/counterpoint. I’d actually have to think about it. Well he wasn't and there is nothing to think about. He was one of the Leaders that lead us in the US Revolution. You know, against England who were were literally at war with. Don't not be so narcissist to believe that a guy who lead one racial group over a guy who was Leading us over another country invading us. Both are noble but this is a different level....I mean come on. Is MLK bigger than Lincoln too I guess even though Lincoln freed the slaves? Kirk is bigger than MLK because he had a global following and affect. Edited September 22 by Royale with Cheese
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 22 Posted September 22 5 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Don't not be so narcissist profound
Royale with Cheese Posted September 22 Posted September 22 4 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Thanks. And I didn't forget your question, I just never read it, so nothing to forget. 😇 You may re-submit if you like No you're lying again. I requoted the question in those replies when I tagged you, you read it and you have been avoiding it. You're responding to those replies with sarcastic responses to avoid the question that you read. So lets do it again. You reasoning that we shouldn't give Tyler Robinson the death penalty is because we can't put his parents through this trauma. Trauma of their child being executed. Well, his dad turned him in to the Feds knowing he will be facing the death penalty and will get it. So is his parents trauma strong enough reasoning to still not execute Tyler Robinson? The same parents that turned him in a death penalty state and the Governor stating to public they will be pursuing death penalty charges. 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: profound Show me proof where you are protected by employers with the First Amendment.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 22 Posted September 22 41 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Was MLK bigger than Benjamin Franklin just because he could reach more of an audience with the television and radio? Bigger? In what way? Both of those men were instrumental in driving major social changes, with Franklin also driving scientific innovation. Kirk doesn't even come close to either of those men
Recommended Posts