SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 31 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: He intentionally mislead and that violates the integrity issue. You are wrong. You don't even know how to look up the word prohibit and we live in the age of google. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986#:~:text=A free speech question might,government can restrict the speech.&text=Under this test%2C the court,might trigger more stringent scrutiny. The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that speech made by public employees within the scope of their official duties is not protected by the First Amendment, though speech made as a private citizen on matters of public concern can be protected by a balancing test. For private sector employees, the First Amendment generally does not apply, and speech protections depend on specific federal and state laws, as well as union contracts. This is all gibberish. You claim that an FCC reg as violated that considers “integrity,” and all I’ve asked you to do is identify the reg. You can’t or won’t do that, and then you spread a lie by some Twitter guy. So, by your logic, you would be removed from TBD if it was a public broadcaster because, like, “integrity.” 6 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: I thought the main topic was silencing free speech? Trump was silenced. Yep. By a private actor. Not by the government. And after trying to overthrow the government. Prove me wrong. 13 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Cause ***** you guys that's why Me speech. Not free speech. And you call yourself a conservative. You don’t even know what the word means. 16 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Because they felt he was in violation of FCC policies. Not true. There’s a protocol for matters of this nature that the FCC did not follow. Prove me wrong. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: This is all gibberish. You claim that an FCC reg as violated that considers “integrity,” and all I’ve asked you to do is identify the reg. You can’t or won’t do that, and then you spread a lie by some Twitter guy. So, by your logic, you would be removed from TBD if it was a public broadcaster because, like, “integrity.” https://www.dictionary.com/browse/prohibit
SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Just now, Royale with Cheese said: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/prohibit Not the rule. Still waiting for you to prove me wrong.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 50 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: Where was this energy when Roseanne was thrown off her own show? Or when Gina Carano was thrown off the Mandalorian? Spare me the outrage. Or when I lost my keys! Ya, I know, those were all the same! Whatever You guys are destroying our country
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Not the rule. Still waiting for you to prove me wrong. I think we established the definition of prohibit. If you violate something that the FCC prohibits, you are breaking the rule. This cannot be explained any easier or more simple. For you to say that its not a rule when the FCC website says it is, you are being ignorant in purpose. 20 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: From FCC website: https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf "Broadcasting false information that causes substantial ‘public harm’ The FCC prohibits broadcasting false information about a crime or a catastrophe if the broadcaster knows the information is false and will cause substantial “public harm” if aired" Let me guess. Kimmel wasn't lying! This kid was definitely MAGA!
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 28 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: so why did the FCC need to threaten? Because Dear Leader was unhappy 1
SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Just now, Royale with Cheese said: I think we established the definition of prohibit. If you violate something that the FCC prohibits, you are breaking the rule. This cannot be explained any easier or more simple. For you to say that its not a rule when the FCC website says it is, you are being ignorant in purpose. What’s the rule? Just find it instead of wasting all of this time demonstrating you haven’t found it.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: . Chris Cuomo Schools the Left on Kimmel’s Suspension Matt Margolis Chris Cuomo just dropped a dose of inconvenient truth about Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, and it’s not what the left wants to hear. Instead of feeding the narrative that this was some grand assault on free speech, Cuomo cut through the noise—and his blunt take won’t sit well with leftists desperate to turn Kimmel into a martyr. Cuomo began by stripping the drama down to the essentials: “You can like or not like Disney’s decision on Kimmel.” He then explained the obvious point the media refuses to entertain: absent evidence of state interference, this is a brand protecting itself. “But until I see proof of actual government coercion of their decision, this is about Disney making a business decision about its brand and the responsibility it has to respect the desires of its audience and its license.” Throughout, Cuomo refused to barter facts for feelings. “I don’t care how you feel about it,” he said, adding bluntly, “We don’t have the proof before us. Maybe we will, then I’ll change my analysis.” In other words: show me the evidence or stop pretending the First Amendment has been violated. After the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk, the facts quickly confirmed what many already suspected: his killer was a radicalized leftist. Yet on his show, Jimmy Kimmel mocked the truth, sneering, “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.” That wasn’t just inaccurate—it was blatant propaganda, and it crossed a legal line. Under 47 CFR § 73.1217, better known as the FCC’s “broadcast hoaxes” rule, television networks and radio stations are strictly prohibited from airing false information about crimes or catastrophes when they know it isn’t true. And it simply wasn't and there was no excuse for anyone at ABC not to know that. Cuomo reiterated the point that should shut down every hysterical hot take on the left: the First Amendment limits government action, not private companies. “And no, it is not a First Amendment issue until you have proof of government intervention because the First Amendment doesn’t apply to private industry in this context. It’s a restriction on government regulation. Okay?” https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/09/18/chris-cuomo-schools-the-left-on-kimmels-suspension-n4943882 The whole fascist media jumping in the blame the victim.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: What’s the rule? Just find it instead of wasting all of this time demonstrating you haven’t found it. This is absolutely crazy. The rule is in the post. Its right there. FFS. It amazes me you think you know more about the FCC than the Chairman. Especially fighting so hard for a racist. What if Megyn Kelly did Black face? Would you want her off the air? 1 minute ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: The whole fascist media jumping in the blame the victim. Still waiting for you to answer my question. 1
SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 2 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: This is absolutely crazy. The rule is in the post. Its right there. FFS. It amazes me you think you know more about the FCC than the Chairman. Especially fighting so hard for a racist. What if Megyn Kelly did Black face? Would you want her off the air? Still waiting for you to answer my question. So whats the rule? Just paste it here and prove me wrong.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Just now, SectionC3 said: So whats the rule? Just paste it here and prove me wrong. Is anyone else seeing this? 1
B-Man Posted September 19 Posted September 19 8 minutes ago, B-Man said: That wasn’t just inaccurate—it was blatant propaganda, and it crossed a legal line. Under 47 CFR § 73.1217, better known as the FCC’s “broadcast hoaxes” rule, television networks and radio stations are strictly prohibited from airing false information about crimes or catastrophes when they know it isn’t true. And it simply wasn't and there was no excuse for anyone at ABC not to know that. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/09/18/chris-cuomo-schools-the-left-on-kimmels-suspension-n4943882
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 19 Posted September 19 38 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Cause ***** you guys that's why Deplorable but at least you’re honest.
JDHillFan Posted September 19 Posted September 19 8 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: What’s the rule? Just find it instead of wasting all of this time demonstrating you haven’t found it. I was pondering how you schooled me yesterday on the “Kimmel provides a lead-in to GMA even with a 6 hour gap between the programs” knowledge. I like the idea that I now know something nobody else in the world knows outside the two of us. Do you think CBS might have shitcanned Colbert because he wasn’t providing a good enough lead-in for CBS Mornings? That show trails GMA and Today rather significantly in viewership. Again, we have to account for a 7 hour gap between shows on CBS. Anyway, I wanted to thank you again for the schooling. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 9 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Still waiting for you to answer my question. Ok, I understand! 🙋♀️
thenorthremembers Posted September 19 Posted September 19 20 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Or when I lost my keys! Ya, I know, those were all the same! Whatever You guys are destroying our country You guys are killing people in front of their children, and we are destroying the country? OK 1 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 18 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: You guys are killing people in front of their children, and we are destroying the country? OK Sure, whatever man.
SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 24 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I was pondering how you schooled me yesterday on the “Kimmel provides a lead-in to GMA even with a 6 hour gap between the programs” knowledge. I like the idea that I now know something nobody else in the world knows outside the two of us. Do you think CBS might have shitcanned Colbert because he wasn’t providing a good enough lead-in for CBS Mornings? That show trails GMA and Today rather significantly in viewership. Again, we have to account for a 7 hour gap between shows on CBS. Anyway, I wanted to thank you again for the schooling. You’re welcome. You need it. On a lot of subjects. 1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said: Because they felt he was in violation of FCC policies. Is it a policy? Or policies? Or a rule?. Or a principle?. You’re all over the place. Just find the rule and show it to everyone. It shouldn’t be that hard, 24 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: You guys are killing people in front of their children, and we are destroying the country? OK That’s a lie. Only one person killed someone. And he was raised by MAGA parents. If this was over the air TV, TBD’s license would be threatened by the FCC. Prove me wrong. 1
Big Blitz Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Sorry Clay. They want to kill you or would cheer if someone did. There is no left v right here. It’s good v evil.
Recommended Posts