Democrats: Mortgage Fraud and General Corruption.

[All_Pro_Bills]

8 hours ago, Homelander said:

@leh-nerd skin-erd doesn't mind this kind of fraud.

 

 

And that would disqualify him from a position on the Fed.

 

There's a lawsuit filed by Ms. Cook which is going to be heard under a "randomly" selected anti-Trump judge. Guess if you can how she'll rule? 

 

I understand it's not 2 but 3 properties now.

 

2 primary residences and a loan for what the applicant clearly stated is a 2nd home which is in reality a rental and 3rd home.

 

So 2 clerical errors. 

 

Ex the partisan politics routine always at play on PPP I'm starting to get cynical about the integrity of the American political class. And it's not confined to 1 specific person or 1 specific party. Unethical behavior seems to be a requirement for these  jobs.

 

Edited August 29 by All_Pro_Bills

[Wolfgang]

2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

And that would disqualify him from a position on the Fed.

 

There's a lawsuit filed by Ms. Cook which is going to be heard under a "randomly" selected anti-Trump judge. Guess if you can how she'll rule? 

 

I understand it's not 2 but 3 properties now.

 

2 primary residences and a loan for what the applicant clearly stated is a 2nd home which is in reality a rental and 3rd home.

 

So 2 clerical errors. 

 

Ex the partisan politics routine always at play on PPP I'm starting to get cynical about the integrity of the American political class. And it's not confined to 1 specific person or 1 specific party. Unethical behavior seems to be a requirement for these  jobs.

 

 

 

 

 

[Homelander]

5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 6 posts in a thread about democrats and fraud, 6 times you’ve gone out of your way to discuss anything but democrats and fraud.  Keep it rolling! 

 

That’s funny, I never hear a peep from you when @BillsFanNC and his army of bots derails a thread. Guess hacks don’t call out hacks when they’re busy running cover for each other. Hypocrisy looks good on you

[T master]

On 8/27/2025 at 6:33 AM, Homelander said:

 

Lock his ass up freakin pervert !!! 

[All_Pro_Bills]

4 hours ago, Homelander said:

 

That’s funny, I never hear a peep from you when @BillsFanNC and his army of bots derails a thread. Guess hacks don’t call out hacks when they’re busy running cover for each other. Hypocrisy looks good on you

All hypocrisy argument aside, can you muster up the courage to admit there's credible and sufficient evidence that Fed board member Ms. Cook acted improperly? 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

4 hours ago, Homelander said:

 

That’s funny, I never hear a peep from you when @BillsFanNC and his army of bots derails a thread. Guess hacks don’t call out hacks when they’re busy running cover for each other. Hypocrisy looks good on you

In one fell swoop, you again avoided the subject of the thread, acknowledged attempting to derail the thread, and believe that your attempt to derail a thread because someone else derails a thread reflects hypocrisy on my part? Fascinating. 
 

For those keeping score, you are now 7/7 avoiding the topic and supporting fraud by democrats.  

[BillsFanNC]

9 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

All hypocrisy argument aside, can you muster up the courage to admit there's credible and sufficient evidence that Fed board member Ms. Cook acted improperly? 

 

What do you think?

[Wolfgang]

17 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

All hypocrisy argument aside, can you muster up the courage to admit there's credible and sufficient evidence that Fed board member Ms. Cook acted improperly? 

 

 

 

Consider who you may or may not be talking to...

 

 

 

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

Homelander hides from discussion because he's a partisan coward.

 

Nothing more. He can't engage in actual discussion like how come if Maxwell has or had dirt on Trump all along how come the Biden administration didn't use that to their advantage? I mean they tried everything else? Either its lies or the Biden administration is that inept.

 

Either one is bad for homelander so he deflects, avoids, and calls other people bots, ironically.

[BillsFanNC]

It's almost as if everyone should have Billstime Homelander on ignore.

[JDHillFan]

4 hours ago, Homelander said:

 

That’s funny, I never hear a peep from you when @BillsFanNC and his army of bots derails a thread. Guess hacks don’t call out hacks when they’re busy running cover for each other. Hypocrisy looks good on you

 

thought you might enjoy this one you once had in your regular rotation.
 

In a related (by related I mean wholly unrelated) matter, why did you post 650 times in the Lincoln Project thread as Billstime, but zero as Highlander? What’s that all about?

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

38 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

All hypocrisy argument aside, can you muster up the courage to admit there's credible and sufficient evidence that Fed board member Ms. Cook acted improperly? 

The interesting part to me is that I didn’t mention Cook, I pointed out well known Dems from NYS with…issues.  Let’s let Cook have her day in the sun, let’s let the government handle things as they see fit.  It would be nice to think there was zero politics in it, but the game is played the way it’s played.  On a scale of 1 to 100, where 1 represents no political shenanigans and 100 represents the DOJ executing a warrant on an adversaries home for doing what it seems most high ranking individuals have done for decades, I’d put this at a 5.  
 

On the bright side, while I’d bet Homey passes on your question, I do believe he’ll offer a crackerjack of a story about an R leaning alderman in a town in Idaho who parked his personal vehicle in a No Standing zone in 1988. 

[Homelander]

3 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

In one fell swoop, you again avoided the subject of the thread, acknowledged attempting to derail the thread, and believe that your attempt to derail a thread because someone else derails a thread reflects hypocrisy on my part? Fascinating. 
 

For those keeping score, you are now 7/7 avoiding the topic and supporting fraud by democrats.  

 

So let me get this straight - you want me outraged over allegations against Democrats, pushed by the most corrupt president and regime in history, while you’ve never once called out Trump or the endless parade of MAGA frauds. My record’s clear: no one is above the law, not even Democrats. Now go on, say the same about Trump, let's hear it.

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

3 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

So let me get this straight - you want me outraged over allegations against Democrats, pushed by the most corrupt president and regime in history, while you’ve never once called out Trump or the endless parade of MAGA frauds. My record’s clear: no one is above the law, not even Democrats. Now go on, say the same about Trump, let's hear it.

Yes, it's the title of the thread topic. Take your tds to the 1500 posts you start and just talk to yourself.

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 minute ago, Homelander said:

 

So let me get this straight - you want me outraged over allegations against Democrats, pushed by the most corrupt president and regime in history, while you’ve never once called out Trump or the endless parade of MAGA frauds. My record’s clear: no one is above the law, not even Democrats. Now go on, say the same about Trump, let's hear it.

I’m not asking you to dance like a puppet one way or the other, your record is indeed very clear. 
 

Off the top of my head:

1. You support democrats and authoritarian overreach because you’re a democrat.

2. You avoid direct conversation on topics you insert yourself into like the plague.  This thread is a perfect example of that.   
3. I don’t care if you’re outraged or not, and based on my observation, you’re way too deep in liberal ideology to even come close to outrage on democrats and fraud.  Again, this thread is an example.  
4.  If you vote, you vote your agenda.  Kamala Harris’ acknowledgments about Biden inappropriately touching women, her belief that he did so would not dissuade you from voting for Biden, or voting for Harris later on.  Not the right type of women, not the right type of abuser, not the correct cause for outrage.  Ditto W Clinton, ditto H Clinton.  You’re every bit the defender of the faith as the most hardcore Trump supporter.
 

I’m going to give you partial credit in this thread for your grandiose acknowledgement that “no one is above the law”.  It’s something to aspire to, but it’s a pipe dream.   Certain people  are above the law, liberals and conservatives, and most people are comfortable looking the other way when it’s their people catching that particular break. 

7.5/8 of your posts are about something other than the topic.  Congrats on your very slight improvement. 

 

[Homelander]

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I’m not asking you to dance like a puppet one way or the other, your record is indeed very clear. 
 

Off the top of my head:

1. You support democrats and authoritarian overreach because you’re a democrat.

2. You avoid direct conversation on topics you insert yourself into like the plague.  This thread is a perfect example of that.   
3. I don’t care if you’re outraged or not, and based on my observation, you’re way too deep in liberal ideology to even come close to outrage on democrats and fraud.  Again, this thread is an example.  
4.  If you vote, you vote your agenda.  Kamala Harris’ acknowledgments about Biden inappropriately touching women, her belief that he did so would not dissuade you from voting for Biden, or voting for Harris later on.  Not the right type of women, not the right type of abuser, not the correct cause for outrage.  Ditto W Clinton, ditto H Clinton.  You’re every bit the defender of the faith as the most hardcore Trump supporter.
 

I’m going to give you partial credit in this thread for your grandiose acknowledgement that “no one is above the law”.  It’s something to aspire to, but it’s a pipe dream.   Certain people  are above the law, liberals and conservatives, and most people are comfortable looking the other way when it’s their people catching that particular break. 

7.5/8 of your posts are about something other than the topic.  Congrats on your very slight improvement. 

 

 

Wow, you wrote a term paper just to avoid admitting you can’t bring yourself to criticize Trump.

 

You call me a ‘defender of the faith,’ but you’re literally doing sermon-length apologetics for MAGA corruption. Projection much?

 

My record’s clear - no one is above the law. Yours is clear too: if Trump andor MAGA does it, you’ll bend over backwards to avoid it.

 

[Homelander]

 

[nedboy7]

3 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

People who support Trump can’t commit crimes or fraud. It’s say so in the Bible. 

[Pokebball]

10 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

legally, and for tax purposes, there is a difference between primary residence and principal residence

[JDHillFan]

13 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

People who support Trump can’t commit crimes or fraud. It’s say so in the Bible. 

 

23 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

 

You post like a moron.  You are a waste of time.