leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 24 Posted July 24 23 hours ago, B-Man said: . We went nearly 250 years before we saw an armed raid on the house of a former President…and we might end up seeing 2 in 5 years! And, if they can loop in the Clintons it would be 3 with a Popular Vote Almost President thrown in for good measure. I think this is why you don’t knock down guardrails. 2
CoudyBills Posted July 24 Posted July 24 4 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: We went nearly 250 years before we saw an armed raid on the house of a former President…and we might end up seeing 2 in 5 years! And, if they can loop in the Clintons it would be 3 with a Popular Vote Almost President thrown in for good measure. I think this is why you don’t knock down guardrails. If it's good for the goose and all, I suppose.
B-Man Posted July 25 Posted July 25 I agree with this. Names like John Brennan and James Comey are among those believed to be in the DOJ’s crosshairs. But then came the elephant in the room: Barack Obama. “If the ultimate targets are someone like a John Brennan or … James Comey or Barack Obama — who, by the way, is not going to be indicted. Anyone who thinks Barack Obama’s going to be indicted: it’s not going to happen,” Solomon admitted. Indeed, while Obama will almost certainly avoid legal consequences, the political and historical fallout could be devastating. If he’s officially named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a plot to frame his successor, and the people who carried out that plot end up in prison, his legacy won’t just take a hit; it’ll be permanently disfigured. It’s hard to claim innocence when everyone who did your bidding goes down for the crime. A scenario like that isn’t something CNN or MSNBC can memory-hole, no matter how hard they try. No, Barack Obama won’t be frog-marched out of his Martha’s Vineyard mansion. But if this investigation follows through, the myth of his “scandal-free” presidency could collapse under the weight of a conspiracy that once masqueraded as patriotism but now reeks of abuse, corruption, and cover-up. Obama may not go to jail, but history may render its own indictment. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/07/25/barack-obama-not-going-to-be-indicted-but-theres-good-news-n4942075
CoudyBills Posted July 25 Posted July 25 33 minutes ago, B-Man said: I agree with this. Names like John Brennan and James Comey are among those believed to be in the DOJ’s crosshairs. But then came the elephant in the room: Barack Obama. “If the ultimate targets are someone like a John Brennan or … James Comey or Barack Obama — who, by the way, is not going to be indicted. Anyone who thinks Barack Obama’s going to be indicted: it’s not going to happen,” Solomon admitted. Indeed, while Obama will almost certainly avoid legal consequences, the political and historical fallout could be devastating. If he’s officially named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a plot to frame his successor, and the people who carried out that plot end up in prison, his legacy won’t just take a hit; it’ll be permanently disfigured. It’s hard to claim innocence when everyone who did your bidding goes down for the crime. A scenario like that isn’t something CNN or MSNBC can memory-hole, no matter how hard they try. No, Barack Obama won’t be frog-marched out of his Martha’s Vineyard mansion. But if this investigation follows through, the myth of his “scandal-free” presidency could collapse under the weight of a conspiracy that once masqueraded as patriotism but now reeks of abuse, corruption, and cover-up. Obama may not go to jail, but history may render its own indictment. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/07/25/barack-obama-not-going-to-be-indicted-but-theres-good-news-n4942075 In order for history to matter, history has to be taught. You think there is any chance that happens?
BillsFanNC Posted July 25 Posted July 25 (edited) I'm skeptical about Obama facing any justice, but then again the the last regime set the precedent for ginning up convoluted legal theories to go after a former POTUS. If they do pull Obama in it will be under this statute cited by Mike Davis below. The statute of limitations hasn't ended because the conspiracy is ongoing. It holds metric tons of water compared to the microliters the Trump lawfare BS did. Edited July 25 by BillsFanNC 1
JFKjr Posted July 26 Posted July 26 I think Obama has a lot to worry about. He should find some countries that don't extradite. 1
Big Blitz Posted July 26 Author Posted July 26 Hahahahahahaha yessir SAS - “this ain’t going away.” “If you're talking about Trump winning the election in 2016 and you then turn around and show proof that there was a concerted effort by the Obama administration to derail his presidency, that creates problems." "You can't ignore scandals like this — because if it involves the CIA, if it involves the FBI, if it involves the weaponization of law enforcement in this country — then we got a problem." "If you are Trump and there is truth to this — and you have the ability with facts to point out what transpired on behalf of the Democratic Party in pursuit of derailing Trump's presidency during his first term — that's a problem." "This is not going away." 1 1 2
BillsFanNC Posted July 26 Posted July 26 If high profile people don't go to prison for this then we are finished. You can't have unelected bureaucrats in the IC undermining the will of the people. Period. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted Sunday at 11:54 AM Posted Sunday at 11:54 AM Porn boy Bullstojan in here embarrassing himself to levels beyond what even the wood paneling glory hole can provide. Love it. 😂 1
BillsFanNC Posted Monday at 07:03 PM Posted Monday at 07:03 PM 🎯 There are 5-10 people who have been deeply involved in reporting on the Russia collusion hoax from the very beginning, back in early 2017. I am one of them, and so is @MZHemingway. We have been doing this for 8 years, covering every single development along the way, at great personal and professional cost. So trust me when I tell you that the blockbuster revelations from last week about the fraudulent ICA are not “old news.” They are some of the biggest developments ever about the corrupt coup against Trump. I would know. Anyone attempting to tell you there’s “nothing new” in the recent declassifications is a liar with an agenda. It’s one thing to claim something is a “nothingburger”—that is garden-variety partisan hackery meant to downplay a damaging political development. Claiming that the ICA revelations are “nothing new,” however, is dishonest in a way that suggests a far more nefarious intent, and a deliberate desire to cover up one of the biggest scandals in American political history. Recall that the FBI raided Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago in search of these documents. Clearly there was something major and explosive in them to warrant such an insane escalation from the people behind the Russia collusion hoax. But now we’re supposed to believe this is old news from people who never managed to report the new news? Interestingly, none of them people claiming to see “nothing new” have ever done any actual reporting on the Russia collusion hoax. None. How would they even know? The answer is they don’t know anything, because they spent the bulk of 2017 and 2018 amplifying every last insane claim about Russian collusion, pimping the Mueller investigation, and bemoaning the seriousness of Trump’s allegedly treasonous collusion. And as soon as it all fell apart, they spent the next several years pretending none of it ever happened. Some of them are liars. All of them are morons. And none of them should be trusted ever again. 1
stevestojan Posted Monday at 09:20 PM Posted Monday at 09:20 PM On 7/27/2025 at 4:54 AM, BillsFanNC said: Porn boy Bullstojan in here embarrassing himself to levels beyond what even the wood paneling glory hole can provide. Love it. 😂 😘
Recommended Posts