SectionC3 Posted July 18 Posted July 18 Big deal. Somebody sued somebody else. I think the drawing is not really a big deal, either, viewed in isolation. It is, however, another piece of evidence that maybe, just maybe, Trump was knee deep in it with Epstein. The only way to answer this, of course, is to honor the promise to release the files. You know, the stuff Pam held up in front of the cameras. The binder didn't say "grand jury minutes," which almost certainly don't implicate Trump because the testimony would have consider the issue of Epstein's misdeeds. So just release the binder and let the court of public opinion draw its own conclusion. 1 1
SCBills Posted July 18 Posted July 18 24 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Big deal. Somebody sued somebody else. I think the drawing is not really a big deal, either, viewed in isolation. It is, however, another piece of evidence that maybe, just maybe, Trump was knee deep in it with Epstein. The only way to answer this, of course, is to honor the promise to release the files. You know, the stuff Pam held up in front of the cameras. The binder didn't say "grand jury minutes," which almost certainly don't implicate Trump because the testimony would have consider the issue of Epstein's misdeeds. So just release the binder and let the court of public opinion draw its own conclusion. My guess is that a lot of big power players are implicated both sides of aisle politically & non-political.. But not so much in the sense that they were sleeping with underage women. More so that they hung in the same circles as Epstein. Therefore, they will show up in plenty of documents by association. Court of public opinion means “interpreted by morons”. Would I like them to release it all? Yes. Do I think the reason it hasn’t been is because it results in absolute chaos? Also yes. Dems playing chicken with Trump on this right now because they don’t actually think he’ll release anything damning to anyone on either side of the aisle, because he’d have to cut off his nose to spite his face. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 18 Posted July 18 11 minutes ago, SCBills said: But not so much in the sense that they were sleeping with underage women. More so that they hung in the same circles as Epstein. Therefore, they will show up in plenty of documents by association. What was the reason the hung out with him and maxwell? He was such a swell guy? birds of a feather...
Big Blitz Posted July 18 Posted July 18 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: What was the reason the hung out with him and maxwell? He was such a swell guy? birds of a feather... Why did he ban him from Mar A Lago by 2007? Why do rich people hang out with other rich people? Well clearly it’s ALL because of pedo trafficking. We asked these questions of Trump in 2016, 2020, 2024. Maybe just maybe you and the media are putting pressure on the wrong guy and the wrong people. Was Hunter Biden ever there? Just wondering out loud. Was Obama? Did he at least meet him by 2005 Dems knowing full well he was running for POTUS in 2007. 1
SectionC3 Posted July 18 Posted July 18 20 minutes ago, SCBills said: My guess is that a lot of big power players are implicated both sides of aisle politically & non-political.. But not so much in the sense that they were sleeping with underage women. More so that they hung in the same circles as Epstein. Therefore, they will show up in plenty of documents by association. Court of public opinion means “interpreted by morons”. Would I like them to release it all? Yes. Do I think the reason it hasn’t been is because it results in absolute chaos? Also yes. Dems playing chicken with Trump on this right now because they don’t actually think he’ll release anything damning to anyone on either side of the aisle, because he’d have to cut off his nose to spite his face. There may be some truth to this. But my beef remains he said he was going to do it, so he should put up or shut up. Especially since, personally, I've been called and labeled many things, including "pedo" (in real life, not in this place of laughs), and I'm of the view that the people responsible for this (led, in a distant way, by Trump) should show the cards they they promised to release.
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 18 Posted July 18 4 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: No offense, but many of you folks read the alt right media exclusively. The WSJ published this after Trump threatened to sue them if they did, and after Trump was given an opportunity to comment. The WSJ follows good journalistic practices, and they have good lawyers to run this by. I therefore assume that the source is credible and is backed up by other evidence. This isn’t Jack POS making up silliness about the underage sex slave den in the nonexistent Comet Pizza basement. I will refrain from the obvious your mama jokes. 3 hours ago, nedboy7 said: Gates is a pedo. Just like Trump. You wont believe it. Your subconscious will make some story up. Its a cult bro. Frankish, WSJ has to this point been the highest level journalist IMO but to print this story without the document is insane. If the evidence exists, then show it, nothing else matters. To Ned, do you know why CBS regrets showing the letter about GWB being charged by the military?
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted July 18 Posted July 18 Suing the WSJ is just stupid. Keeps the story alive and does nothing to help Trump who will lose--AGAIN--in court. The pressure is getting to him. He is fragile and breaking 2 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted July 18 Posted July 18 6 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Anyone who believes the story as likely true without seeing the letter is too gullible to argue with. If they release the letter I will believe it and then try and determine whether it is authentic WSJ is the cornerstone of Conservative journalism. You clowns acting likes it's a tabloid Very damning letter tying these two scum bags together. They were sexual assaulter friends
stevestojan Posted July 18 Posted July 18 “But there’s an em dash - those didn’t exist before 2023!” 😂
Big Blitz Posted July 18 Posted July 18 3 minutes ago, stevestojan said: “But there’s an em dash - those didn’t exist before 2023!” 😂 They are a common AI indicator. In context to this it’s the final tell.
Big Blitz Posted July 18 Posted July 18 This is what we mean - files in the hands of a Republican administration will not get the same scrutiny. No one will question Obama. Hillary. No one in media will take the declassified info from Tulsi and not say “but but but ….. coordinate a denial campaign”. The public will be gaslit. That’s what would happen with Epstein files that implicate any prominent Dem. Understand why Team Trump roped Ds in to demanding the Epstein release? As for Russia - time for arrests as per Tulsi’s work.
stevestojan Posted July 18 Posted July 18 25 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: They are a common AI indicator. In context to this it’s the final tell. So Donnie uses AI to compose his social media posts? 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 18 Posted July 18 10 minutes ago, stevestojan said: So Donnie uses AI to compose his social media posts? I would be surprised if he does not use AI to clean it up sometimes. Why would that be a problem, especially if it is to make it cleaner?
stevestojan Posted July 19 Posted July 19 Just now, Orlando Buffalo said: I would be surprised if he does not use AI to clean it up sometimes. Why would that be a problem, especially if it is to make it cleaner? Not a problem, don’t be so sensitive. I was just asking if we think Donnie has one window open for Twitter, and another window open for ChatGPT while posting on social media. Because my lord the GPT I use has far superior grammar to what he posts. I guess his version ONLY adds em dashes but doesn’t recommend maybe not using all caps like an angry child or calling people scum in the middle of a Memorial Day post. 😂 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 19 Posted July 19 6 minutes ago, stevestojan said: Not a problem, don’t be so sensitive. I was just asking if we think Donnie has one window open for Twitter, and another window open for ChatGPT while posting on social media. Because my lord the GPT I use has far superior grammar to what he posts. I guess his version ONLY adds em dashes but doesn’t recommend maybe not using all caps like an angry child or calling people scum in the middle of a Memorial Day post. 😂 So you are saying you believe the letter from "2003" is not really from then?
stevestojan Posted July 19 Posted July 19 4 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: So you are saying you believe the letter from "2003" is not really from then? I’m saying that stating that an em dash means the letter isn’t real is hilarious. The fact that it is somewhat well written is a much bigger potential tell that Drumpf didn’t write it. I have no horse in this race. I do not think Trump is a pedophile. I think he’s an overall horrendous human being but I don’t think he is a pedophile. I think if there was anything in the “file” (the one on the desk; same one that doesn’t exist) he would have been buried long ago. I think he was friendly with a creep. That’s not a crime. But I do want to know who is in the file (the one on the desk; the one that doesn’t exist) and I think we all have a right to know. But I don’t think we ever will. This ***** is just too crazy to make up. The whole thing. But no. I don’t think the use of an em dash proves - or disproves - anything. 1 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 19 Posted July 19 5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: No offense, but many of you folks read the alt right media exclusively. The WSJ published this after Trump threatened to sue them if they did, and after Trump was given an opportunity to comment. The WSJ follows good journalistic practices, and they have good lawyers to run this by. I therefore assume that the source is credible and is backed up by other evidence. This isn’t Jack POS making up silliness about the underage sex slave den in the nonexistent Comet Pizza basement. I will refrain from the obvious your mama jokes. My mother was addicted to drugs it's was ugly but she beat it. Please proceed with your jokes you piece of *****.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 19 Posted July 19 10 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: comparing a doctor patient relationship to a non medical professional trying to soothe a sexual assault victim is absurd, even for you. Perhaps not the best choice but hardly salacious Patients sometimes hugged me (both men and women), not the other way around. I'm not a hugger. I've seen nurses rubbing necks and backs of distraught patients. Do you think that's wrong? You used "groped" to sensationalize and you know it. you're not an honest broker. You have to hop off that pedestal you put yourself on, Fergs, lots of people work with people and get/give hugs. You’re dismissing the words and feelings of the women who made the complaints about Biden touching them inappropriately, not me. It’s you making an absurd argument. You not being a hugger doesn’t preclude you from acknowledging Biden’s behavior, geesh you love to carry water for the guy.
stevestojan Posted July 19 Posted July 19 1 hour ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: My mother was addicted to drugs it's was ugly but she beat it. Please proceed with your jokes you piece of *****. Well that escalated quickly. Only on PPP can we go from talking about JD Vance to someone’s mom’s drug addiction in just two posts. What a forum!
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 19 Posted July 19 (edited) 2 hours ago, stevestojan said: So Donnie uses AI to compose his social media posts? yeah, he's not that bright. And your point? Edited July 19 by Joe Ferguson forever
Recommended Posts