Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Niagara Bill said:

I am not a lefty. I am financial conservative.  Reagan and Nixon would good presidents. Multoney and Harper were great prime ministers.

Trump was a Democrat, turned power hungry wannabe dictator, liar, conman and likely pedophile. 

If the 51st is not his goal I will be thankful and apologetic,  but project 25 is real IMHO.

Who could stop him...congress, DoD, VP, Supreme Court, Canadian army. Canada only chance is China...just watch.

But I will apologize if wrong. 

But if it become obvious I am right, what would you do and say.

I would say “Welcome home, Neighbour!”.  Then I would tell you not to touch my stuff.  
 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

I would give you credit for seeing something that not one single rational person could have imagined. Let’s not hold our breath on that.
 

Looking forward to the egg on your face in Nov 2026. 

So for now you are suggesting no one in the US takes 51 as a serious position.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Niagara Bill said:

So for now you are suggesting no one in the US takes 51 as a serious position.

He said rational. No, no rational person takes it seriously. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Thanks for the reminder.  Still no Epstein files.  (Also, we haven't done anything about inflation, but I suppose covering up Epstein and wondering what happened to Melania take a great deal of time.)  

Posted
5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Thanks for the reminder.  Still no Epstein files.  (Also, we haven't done anything about inflation, but I suppose covering up Epstein and wondering what happened to Melania take a great deal of time.)  

Over 4 1/2 years covering two administrations and still no release of the files and judges denying the current administration's request to unseal Grand Jury testimony because "there's nothing significant" in the testimony. Then release it. 

 

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Over 4 1/2 years covering two administrations and still no release of the files and judges denying the current administration's request to unseal Grand Jury testimony because "there's nothing significant" in the testimony. Then release it. 

 

 

It’s grand jury testimony and such typically is sealed.  It’s also not comprehensive relative to the investigation.  We weren’t promised GJ testimony.  We were promised files.  So show the cards.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

It’s grand jury testimony and such typically is sealed.  It’s also not comprehensive relative to the investigation.  We weren’t promised GJ testimony.  We were promised files.  So show the cards.  

Like I said 4 1/2 years of silence.

Posted
2 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

What Hank II said. 

Hope Hank is right. 

30 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

It’s grand jury testimony and such typically is sealed.  It’s also not comprehensive relative to the investigation.  We weren’t promised GJ testimony.  We were promised files.  So show the cards.  

Cannot see the facts thru the smoke! 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Thanks for the reminder.  Still no Epstein files.  (Also, we haven't done anything about inflation, but I suppose covering up Epstein and wondering what happened to Melania take a great deal of time.)  

With each passing day, Trump not releasing the Epstein files is becoming less of an issue…

 

It’s a case of the rich and powerful protecting eachother…

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

With each passing day, Trump not releasing the Epstein files is becoming less of an issue…

 

It’s a case of the rich and powerful protecting eachother…

It will be an issue in the mid term elections. 

 

 

"Candidate X, will you pledge to investigate why child molester Maxwell was given special treatment by the President?" 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

It will be an issue in the mid term elections. 

 

 

"Candidate X, will you pledge to investigate why child molester Maxwell was given special treatment by the President?" 

I really don't think it will be. Too much time will pass. And there's one irrefutable hurdle that the dems won't be able to clear, if there was anything in the files that could hurt Trump the Harris campaign would have used it to win the election. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Hank II said:

I really don't think it will be. Too much time will pass. And there's one irrefutable hurdle that the dems won't be able to clear, if there was anything in the files that could hurt Trump the Harris campaign would have used it to win the election. 

Harris didn't move a convicted sex offender to Club Fed. Inquiring minds will want to know why that happened. 

 

Who the hell goes out of their way to help child sex offenders? 

 

Trump does! 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
16 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

I would give you credit for seeing something that not one single rational person could have imagined. Let’s not hold our breath on that.
 

Looking forward to the egg on your face in Nov 2026. 

Better than wasting beef,  which Trump has made way more expensive.  

Posted
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

Better than wasting beef,  which Trump has made way more expensive.  

He’s probably had enough meat in his face along the way. Nothing wrong with it. Live and let live. 

Posted
3 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Thanks for the reminder.  Still no Epstein files.  (Also, we haven't done anything about inflation, but I suppose covering up Epstein and wondering what happened to Melania take a great deal of time.)  

 

Libs want to see the pedos. (finally)

 

Let's bring it!

 

Hillary%252BClinton%252BHillary%252BClin

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

 

So sad they didn't release this during the campaign last year, so Kamala could've benefited. 

 

giphy.gif

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...