Biden: prostate cancer diagnosis. Medical EXPERTS say he likely had diagnosis for entire term.

[B-Man]

 

 

Joe’s Cancer Diagnosis: This Is Jill’s Fault.

 

I’m going to be very blunt.This is Jill’s fault. We all know it. Jill wanted to keep her power and privilege flowing. She’s Edith Wilson on steroids.

Now, in addition to his very real but kept hidden dementia, we find out that Joe has Stage 4 Prostate cancer.

 

Former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an “aggressive” form of prostate cancer, a spokesman announced Sunday.

The diagnosis was revealed after doctors found a “small nodule” on Biden’s prostate that “necessitated further evaluation” during a physical exam earlier this month.

 

As Lisa pointed out here, the nodule was “discovered” and just a few days later, we move from a nodule to aggressive Stage 4 cancer? I’m skeptical of the timing, speed, and more. Why? For a multitude of reasons.

 

One: Joe Biden hasn’t been well since the first day of his 2020 campaign. In fact, I’d venture to say he wasn’t well even BEFORE that campaign started. Yet anyone who pointed out their very real and genuine concerns was set on blast by the Democrats and media, and anything on social media was throttled into oblivion.

 

Two: Once Joe had that disastrous debate with Donald Trump, our suspicions and fears were realized yet we were still shouted down. Until this spring when suddenly it’s ok to tell the stories. Yes, Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, I’m looking at YOU.

 

Three: As President, Joe Biden is surrounded by and has top notch medical teams at his disposal. Do you mean to tell me that all these medical professionals whose JOB is to make SURE that the President of the United States remains in good health missed all these signs or didn’t even TEST for cancers including prostate??

 

 

 

https://victorygirlsblog.com/joes-cancer-diagnosis-this-is-jills-fault/

 

 

 

*

 

 

.

Edited 3 hours ago by B-Man

[Joe Ferguson forever]

15 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Quack with the appeal to authority. Funny how that didn't work for him when experts from Stanford, Harvard and Oxford told us that the covid lockdowns were doing more harm than good.

 

In regard to PSA tests and the literature he's cited, Quack as usual has no idea what he's talking about in terms of sensitivity and specificity of biological immunoassays.

 

 

 

 

 

My doctor and I followed the  guidelines and found cancer.  It was the right thing to do.  Now we are doing active surveillance which is also the right thing to do.  Re the specificity and sensitivity of tests, here's yet another quote from a 2024 article in a Family Practice journal (primary care docs do the vast majority of testing and interpretation)

Although PSA testing has been used to screen for prostate cancer since 1987, there is no consensus on which threshold should warrant a prostate biopsy. The most commonly used threshold of more than 4.0 ng per mL (4.0 μg per L) has an approximately 70% false-positive rate. Lowering the threshold to more than 2.5 ng per mL (2.5 μg per L) increases the false-positive rate to 80%.8 Using a biopsy threshold of more than 4.0 ng per mL, the PSA test has an overall sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 93%, and positive predictive value of 25%.9 As many as 15% of men with a PSA level less than 4.0 ng per mL will have prostate cancer on biopsy, and 15% of those cancers are high grade (which is a possibility in Biden's case).10 Benign prostatic processes, such as hypertrophy or infection, can also cause PSA elevations.

Many strategies have been suggested to improve the diagnostic performance of the PSA test, such as free PSA, PSA velocity, and PSA density. However, none of these strategies has been evaluated in an RCT.

 

It's a hugely flawed test but still valuable in the appropriate population.

 

You're dim.

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever

[Joe Ferguson forever]

35 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an “aggressive” form of prostate cancer, a spokesman announced Sunday.

The diagnosis was revealed after doctors found a “small nodule” on Biden’s prostate that “necessitated further evaluation” during a physical exam earlier this month.

 

As Lisa pointed out here, the nodule was “discovered” and just a few days later, we move from a nodule to aggressive Stage 4 cancer? I’m skeptical of the timing, speed, and more. Why? For a multitude of reasons.

 

stupid people should not do science or medicine.  This is from The American cancer society site and is the currently used staging system

 

IVA

Any T, N1, M0

Any Grade Group

Any PSA

The tumor might or might not be growing into tissues near the prostate [any T]. The cancer has spread to nearby lymph nodes [N1] but has not spread elsewhere in the body [M0]. The Grade Group can be any value, and the PSA can be any value.

 

IVB

Any T, any N, M1

Any Grade Group

Any PSA

The cancer might or might not be growing into tissues near the prostate [any T] and might or might not have spread to nearby lymph nodes [any N]. It has spread to other parts of the body, such as distant lymph nodes, bones, or other organs [M1]. The Grade Group can be any value, and the PSA can be any value.

 

as you can see, stage 4 is primarily defined by mets and lymph nodes.  tumor size (T) does not define stage 4. The tumor can be any size.  additionally, a large tumor can still be felt on rectal exam as a nodule.

Edited 3 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever

[Motorin']

6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

You're dim.

 

 

Says a guy who actively participated in the "Joe Biden is mentally fit" charade on this site. 

 

Given the complete cover up and lying about Biden's mental acuity, why would anyone believe they're telling the truth about the cancer diagnosis only being made recently? Especially given the fact that Joe Biden said he had cancer over two years ago during an impromptu speech?

 

No, the fact is that you actively engage in the distortion of reality because you want it to comport to the way you want to world to be. 

 

That's to say, you're the good guy and have truth on your side. And the "other side" is the bad guy and all they do is lie. 

 

So you look for any evidence to give you a loop hole of denial. 

 

In this case, PSA's are unreliable, so you're dumb if you think Biden's cancer was caught before it metastisized to the bone. Surely they wouldn't have his that from the public, because they're the good guys! 

 

Likewise, Biden was mentally fit his entire presidency, the right wing is lying and using deep fakes to say otherwise. Because they're the bad guys and the bad guys only lie!

 

It's also a conspiracy theory to say COVID originated from a lab, despite 70 million in grant funding from Fauci's NIH and USAID to the Wuhan COVID lab to do gain of function research on a CV virus that looks remarkably like CV19.

 

They would never lie about funding the research, and they would never run a censorship campaign to silence the scientists who recognized the human manipulation in CV19. 

 

They would never do any of that because they are the good guys and the good guys always tell the truth. It's the bad guys who lie! And that's what we call "following the science" folks! The good guys always follow the science and always tell the truth.

 

Ipso Facto any notion of any cover-up during the Good Guys term in power is a made up lie that amounts to a conspiracy theory from the bad guys. 

 

[JDHillFan]

55 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Maybe.  Maybe not if the white house doc appropriately feels a psa in an 82yo  has more risks than benefits..  Either way, there's a decent chance it wasn't picked up by the test if it was done. again, sensitivity is low.

You find it appropriate not to test his PSA even though he was all set to be the nominee and give us four more glorious years? I know you will say yes because you are a hack. Nobody believes that’s a good plan, including you. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

9 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

In this case, PSA's are unreliable, so you're dumb if you think Biden's cancer was caught before it metastisized to the bone. Surely they wouldn't have his that from the public, because they're the good guys! 

nope.  you're dim if you pretend to know when or if a psa was done or that it was positive just because you want to.  the test is not great.  i've repeatedly shown that.  not a loophole.  a fact.  it is absolutely possible that a psa was done a year ago and was negative.  I posted a link that showed 15% of false neg psa's are in patients with aggressive cancers.  not a loophole, a fact.

 

and yes, by now we are all well aware of the hate maga's have for science.  

Edited 3 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever

[Joe Ferguson forever]

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

But pretending a fantasy is reality isn’t the answer here, and it never is.  This is the world of politics, where every advantage is exploited, and the people who play in that space move in and out of hypocritical behavior without a thought about it.  Biden the person has every right to maintaining his secrecy, Biden the former prez and face of the modern Dem party does not. 
 

The reason it’s a major issue is because it will be made a major issue.  Individually, no one cares your opinion or mine for that matter. 
 

However, as a political cudgel it holds great promise to sway voters whose minds are not made up next time around.  An effective political campaign uses the tools in the tool belt and lays out the danger of trusting the party with an increasingly  long laundry list of hiding/manipulating/defrauding/weaponizing the system.  Add to that the narrative of waste, fraud and abuse  that goes against the best interests of taxpayers, and the portrayal of dems partnering with gang members and it’s a winning formula.

 

In the end, it doesn’t really matter whether Biden knew or didn’t, the goal is to flush out the truth if possible, but hammer the credibility and link it to the Hur tapes. 
 

The Dems will have their own version, of course, so it really boils down to sentiment at the time the race plays out.  

sounds like you approved of vance saying people were eating dogs and cats in Ohio, only to later admit he lied.

Edited 3 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever

[Motorin']

6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

nope.  you're dim if you pretend to know when or if a psa was done or that it was positive just because you want to.  the test is not great.  i've repeatedly shown that.  not a loophole.  a fact.  it is absolutely possible that a psa was done a year ago and was negative.  I posted a link that showed 15% of false neg psa's are in patients with aggressive cancers.  not a loophole, a fact.

 

and yes, by now we are all well aware of the hate maga's have for science.  

 

Right. You're the good guy. You follow the science. Good boy. Pat yourself on the head. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

Just now, Motorin' said:

 

Right. You're the good guy. You follow the science. Good boy. Pat yourself on the head. 

if following the facts makes me a good guy, then I am.  I was adequately compensated for that already.  No head pat needed.

[JDHillFan]

13 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

sounds like you approved of vance saying people were eating dogs and cats in Ohio, only to later admit he lied.

Sometimes it’s better to not reply.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

14 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

sounds like you approved of vance saying people were eating dogs and cats in Ohio, only to later admit he lied.

Well, if you read what I wrote, you would realize that it doesn't matter what I believe, it's the nature of politics.  For example, Trump and his decision not to produce his tax returns.  Obviously, his tax returns are his personal business and he was under no legal obligation to produce his returns.  Precedent is fine, but he chose a different path in the run against Clinton.  Turns out it wasn't a deal breaker in spite of precedent and liberal hand-wringing.  

 

 

[Motorin']

1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

if following the facts makes me a good guy, then I am.  I was adequately compensated for that already.  No head pat needed.

 

Now you sound like a retired Patrick Bateman. Elitist + Psycho 

[4th&long]

3 hours ago, njbuff said:

Man, you are one dumb hateful little p@ssy prick.

It wasn't directed at Joe f. It was directed at all you *****. Very easy info to find and all Maga is doing is spreading bull sh it. 

[4th&long]

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

But pretending a fantasy is reality isn’t the answer here, and it never is.  This is the world of politics, where every advantage is exploited, and the people who play in that space move in and out of hypocritical behavior without a thought about it.  Biden the person has every right to maintaining his secrecy, Biden the former prez and face of the modern Dem party does not. 
 

The reason it’s a major issue is because it will be made a major issue.  Individually, no one cares your opinion or mine for that matter. 
 

However, as a political cudgel it holds great promise to sway voters whose minds are not made up next time around.  An effective political campaign uses the tools in the tool belt and lays out the danger of trusting the party with an increasingly  long laundry list of hiding/manipulating/defrauding/weaponizing the system.  Add to that the narrative of waste, fraud and abuse  that goes against the best interests of taxpayers, and the portrayal of dems partnering with gang members and it’s a winning formula.

 

In the end, it doesn’t really matter whether Biden knew or didn’t, the goal is to flush out the truth if possible, but hammer the credibility and link it to the Hur tapes. 
 

The Dems will have their own version, of course, so it really boils down to sentiment at the time the race plays out.  

Every abvantage exploited? You think there is some advantage to announcing he has cancer now? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha. 

 

I could see with the mental fitness stuff. If they found it earlier it wouldn't be aggressive or gone to his bones. It would have been in the early stages of the cancer and treatable. 

 

But hey I'm not here to ruin maga's fun of posting lies bull sh it and hate. I'm just here to bash Maga over the head. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

excellent article

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-05-20/6-doctors-on-bidens-cancer-diagnosis-how-it-may-have-arisen-and-his-treatment-options

 

Dr. Mark Litwin, chair of UCLA Urology, said that description indicated Biden has a more advanced and aggressive form of prostate cancer than is diagnosed in most men, but that it was nonetheless “a very common scenario” — with about 10% of such cancers in men being metastatic at diagnosis.

Dr. Howard Sandler, chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology at Cedars-Sinai, agreed.

“It’s a little unusual for him to show up with prostate cancer that’s metastatic to bone at first diagnosis, but not extraordinary,” he said. “It happens every day to elderly men.”

 

The doctors The Times spoke to had no special insight into Biden’s medical care, but said his diagnosis did not make them feel any less confident about the caliber of that care or suggest to them any nefarious intent to hide his condition.

For starters, “it would be considered well within the standard of care” for Biden to have forgone testing in recent years, given his age, Sandler said. “Certainly after 80.”

Litwin said he believes Biden probably was still tested, given his position, but that doesn’t mean he was necessarily hiding anything either. Some forms of aggressive prostate cancer don’t secrete antigens into the blood at levels that would be flagged in a PSA test, while others can grow and even metastasize rapidly — within a matter of months, and between routine annual screenings, he said.

Patel said he has personally found “very aggressive disease” in patients who had relatively normal PSA levels. “I don’t think anyone can blame anyone in terms of was this caught too late or anything like that,” he said. “This happens not too infrequently.”

Dr. Alicia Morgans, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, a genitourinary medical oncologist and the director of the Survivorship Program at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, agreed. Even if a patient is diligent about getting screened annually, “there will be some cancers that arise between screening tests,” she said.

Edited 22 minutes ago by Joe Ferguson forever

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

52 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

Every abvantage exploited? You think there is some advantage to announcing he has cancer now? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha. 

 

I could see with the mental fitness stuff. If they found it earlier it wouldn't be aggressive or gone to his bones. It would have been in the early stages of the cancer and treatable. 

 

But hey I'm not here to ruin maga's fun of posting lies bull sh it and hate. I'm just here to bash Maga over the head. 

I spent the last couple days punching down at a dopey poster who made something up, but backed down like a dime store Karen when I asked him to document his claims.  I'm hopeful we can avoid all that silliness here and will clarify what I was saying previously: 

 

It would go like this:

• The democrat party and Joe Biden lied to you about his cognitive state, and the media was complicit in the cover up;
• Now, the democrat party and Joe Biden withheld information on his bout with prostate cancer, and very well may have hidden that from voters when Joe was running last year. 

The advantage would be for the benefit of the GOP, continuing to hammer on the point that the dems are perpetually dishonest to their voting bloc and make them look easily played and quite foolish.  That advantage might be significant or insignificant at the mid-terms, and significant or insignificant at the next presidential election.  

 

In the end, it's the nature of politics.  We agree on that, yes? 

 

That was my point.  That is all.