Pokebball Posted Thursday at 04:42 PM Posted Thursday at 04:42 PM 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: BDS. Just move on. He isn't POTUS anymore! The point is that he never was in reality POTUS. This coverup will certainly be used against every Dem that was complicit. How effective it will be remains to be seen. For that reason alone, this issue won't be "moved on" 1
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 08:22 PM Posted Thursday at 08:22 PM 3 hours ago, Pokebball said: This coverup will certainly be used against every Dem that was complicit. How effective it will be remains to be seen. For that reason alone, this issue won't be "moved on" Who is going to use it against Dems? Fox and Twitter? The people responsible for this being “fooled” by the Biden people will all rally together like it never happened. It’s why everything is being attributed to anonymous sources. There will be no names named. The good news is that it’s only willing dupes like Redhawk and Frankish that will follow along like good little boys. EVERYONE else can see what the deal is.
Pokebball Posted Thursday at 08:35 PM Posted Thursday at 08:35 PM 9 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Who is going to use it against Dems? Fox and Twitter? The people responsible for this being “fooled” by the Biden people will all rally together like it never happened. It’s why everything is being attributed to anonymous sources. There will be no names named. The good news is that it’s only willing dupes like Redhawk and Frankish that will follow along like good little boys. EVERYONE else can see what the deal is. Who was fooled? Some dems and I'd say a lot of the legacy media purposefully and intentionally denied it and actively fought against the narrative. I don't think that will be forgotten.
JDHillFan Posted Thursday at 08:44 PM Posted Thursday at 08:44 PM 8 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Who was fooled? Some dems and I'd say a lot of the legacy media purposefully and intentionally denied it and actively fought against the narrative. I don't think that will be forgotten. Correct and it won’t be forgotten, except by leftist coops. The media has already shi* their credibility away. It’s not about to be a reckoning for them.
BillsFanNC Posted Thursday at 08:50 PM Posted Thursday at 08:50 PM Being 'fooled' into believing that Biden is mentally fit is simply TDS. Any information that might damage Trump's opposition, thereby helping the orange menace himself, must be discredited.
JDHillFan Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 13 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Being 'fooled' into believing that Biden is mentally fit is simply TDS. Can confirm ⬇️. Worst “doctor” ever. On 3/6/2023 at 3:15 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said: I've seen it 100's of times. I don't believe he has any cognitive impairment. His speech has been abnormal his entire life. by all accounts, it has actually improved. gait and facial expressions abnormalities are more suggestive of Parkinsons but I don't see those characteristic changes either and he has no tremor. Check out the date on this gem ⬇️ On 10/29/2024 at 11:59 PM, The Frankish Reich said: He's still mentally fit to do the job. 1
njbuff Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 5 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Can confirm ⬇️. Worst “doctor” ever. Check out the date on this gem ⬇️ This is PROOF that what the dim witted leftists on this board say means NOTHING and are full blown liars with severe TDS.
GaryPinC Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Let's be real. No one over 80 should be President. That means 76 is the election cutoff. Even most Octagenarians displaying solid mental acuity are prone to critical thinking lapses which is why scammers are effective. Alternatively, you could consider a medical evaluation but it would have to be a neutrally selected panel and with a standard of testing and reporting. Speaking of that, I want some accountability on his physician who was lying through his teeth and/or willfully not conducting appropriate cognitive tests. Too easy to hide behind HIPAA. Lastly, Jill Biden deserves some accountability focus for her unethical behavior. Who was making the decisions? The one who is still trying to trot him out now. It's disturbing to me she won't usher him off into retirement in his fading years. 1
JDHillFan Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 3 minutes ago, GaryPinC said: Who was making the decisions? Have you seen or encountered a single democrat supporter that has asked this question? Certainly not here at PPP. Scary. 2
GaryPinC Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 2 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Have you seen or encountered a single democrat supporter that has asked this question? Certainly not here at PPP. Scary. Yes, I have. Just not at PPP. Let's see if you are any better if Trump's mind is completely shot before the end of it's turn. Because it's always pots calling kettles black with both sides here.
JDHillFan Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, GaryPinC said: Yes, I have. Just not at PPP. Let's see if you are any better if Trump's mind is completely shot before the end of it's turn. Because it's always pots calling kettles black with both sides here. You haven’t seen it in the media. Perhaps in your personal circles. I am not a Trump guy and will call it as I see it - without being defensive as you seem to be with this reply.
BillsFanNC Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 7 minutes ago, GaryPinC said: Yes, I have. Just not at PPP. Let's see if you are any better if Trump's mind is completely shot before the end of it's turn. Because it's always pots calling kettles black with both sides here. If Trump starts to obviously decline do you think the media en masse will hide it and refuse to report it?
GaryPinC Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: You haven’t seen it in the media. Perhaps in your personal circles. I am not a Trump guy and will call it as I see it - without being defensive as you seem to be with this reply. I don't follow a particular media that closely, tbh. I do gather from both sided biased media. But personal, yes. I try and discuss with both sides and understand. We seem to have lost that as a country so it's important to me to make the effort. While I certainly have biases left or right depending on the issue, I consider myself independent. Seeing both extremes on here only pointing fingers at the other side then wallowing in hypocrisy when the impropriety takes place on their side is laughable but sad. Real change needs to first acknowledge the BS of both sides, no matter how fervently you support one. Just now, BillsFanNC said: If Trump starts to obviously decline do you think the media en masse will hide it and refuse to report it? Right wing for sure, left wing will scream it from the mountain tops, opposite of but paralleling what happened with Biden.
BillsFanNC Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, GaryPinC said: I don't follow a particular media that closely, tbh. I do gather from both sided biased media. But personal, yes. I try and discuss with both sides and understand. We seem to have lost that as a country so it's important to me to make the effort. While I certainly have biases left or right depending on the issue, I consider myself independent. Seeing both extremes on here only pointing fingers at the other side then wallowing in hypocrisy when the impropriety takes place on their side is laughable but sad. Real change needs to first acknowledge the BS of both sides, no matter how fervently you support one. Right wing for sure, left wing will scream it from the mountain tops, opposite of but paralleling what happened with Biden. I'm talking legacy media here. So by right wing you're saying Fox News, so it would hardly be the same thing if they flat out refused to acknowledge obvious Trump deficiencies the way the entire rest (90%) of the legacy media covered for Biden for the entire four years. You can't both sides this one. 1
GaryPinC Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: I'm talking legacy media here. So by right wing you're saying Fox News, so it would hardly be the same thing if they flat out refused to acknowledge obvious Trump deficiencies the way the entire rest (90%) of the legacy media covered for Biden for the entire four years. You can't both sides this one. I would say I can, why do you think I can't look at how both sides project their bias? Each side of the biased media behaving the same depending on which party is in the white house. Why do you feel like only legacy media matters here? Fox, Breitbart, Washington Times, New York Post, Daily Wire, NewsMax? Why do you think we exclude these sources? Let's look at your argument. If Fox News covers up and/or makes excuses for Trump's obvious decline like the mainstream liberal media did for much of Biden's term, why is that different? Same MO. This time around the mainstream media would trumpet every mistake and gaffe just like right wing media did during Biden's term. They already are. What's the difference that is so critical to you?
All_Pro_Bills Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 16 minutes ago, GaryPinC said: I would say I can, why do you think I can't look at how both sides project their bias? Each side of the biased media behaving the same depending on which party is in the white house. Why do you feel like only legacy media matters here? Fox, Breitbart, Washington Times, New York Post, Daily Wire, NewsMax? Why do you think we exclude these sources? Let's look at your argument. If Fox News covers up and/or makes excuses for Trump's obvious decline like the mainstream liberal media did for much of Biden's term, why is that different? Same MO. This time around the mainstream media would trumpet every mistake and gaffe just like right wing media did during Biden's term. They already are. What's the difference that is so critical to you? For me it's hardly an even fight betwen left vs. right media but instead a case of Fox vs. the entire cast of liberal legacy media outlets. Like 1 vs. 20 or so. 1
BillsFanNC Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 38 minutes ago, GaryPinC said: I would say I can, why do you think I can't look at how both sides project their bias? Each side of the biased media behaving the same depending on which party is in the white house. Why do you feel like only legacy media matters here? Fox, Breitbart, Washington Times, New York Post, Daily Wire, NewsMax? Why do you think we exclude these sources? Let's look at your argument. If Fox News covers up and/or makes excuses for Trump's obvious decline like the mainstream liberal media did for much of Biden's term, why is that different? Same MO. This time around the mainstream media would trumpet every mistake and gaffe just like right wing media did during Biden's term. They already are. What's the difference that is so critical to you? The main difference is with Biden it actually happened. With Trump you're claiming it would happen. The mainstream media en masse blatantly ignored the obvious and severe cognitive decline of the friggin POTUS, lapping up the blatant lies from the WH and asking their viewers/readers to ignore the evidence of their eyes and ears. If Trump started to repeatedly attempt to shake hands with imaginary people, forget close aides names, get lost walking off stage, mumble incoherently etc. Fox News very well might provide slanted coverage like they always do, but they wouldn't ignore it as if it wasn't happening at all, or accuse democrats who bring it up as being purveyors of cheap fakes. This scandal is so far beyond the both sides are biased argument. Edited 6 hours ago by BillsFanNC 1
Recommended Posts