B-Man Posted May 22 Posted May 22 3 hours ago, K D said: Why hasn't anyone been indicted? Sounds like this should be taken to court It will be.
B-Man Posted May 23 Posted May 23 More on the above. Ed Martin Named the Top Three Suspects in the Biden Autopen Fiasco by Matt Vespa Ed Martin’s nomination to serve as DC Attorney was nuked by Republican Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC). He was in office on an interim basis. Trump selected Jeanine Pirro to replace Martin, who is now a pardon attorney and helming the Department of Justice’s weaponization task force. Martin is looking at Biden’s pardons, specifically the ones issued toward the end of his presidency. They might not be legal. It comes off allegations that Biden aides might have illegally used the autopen. President Trump has asked who was behind the autopen since it’s become clear that Joe Biden was not mentally cogent enough to know what was going on Martin named three top suspects in his probe into the pardons and the autopen: Anita Dunn, Bob Bauer, and Ron Klain. Bauer and Dunn are married, with the former being present for Biden’s deposition with Special Counsel Robert Hur, who was investigating Biden for mishandling classified documents while serving as Obama’s vice president. Bauer claimed that Hur’s account of events wasn’t how he saw things, which made the case for releasing the tapes. Portions were leaked last week where Biden, indeed, sounded awful https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/05/22/ed-martin-named-the-top-three-suspects-in-the-biden-autopen-fiasco-n2657436
BillsFanNC Posted May 23 Author Posted May 23 Anita Dunn: Mao admirer controlled the autopen But stop calling her a commie.
T master Posted Sunday at 11:01 PM Posted Sunday at 11:01 PM Auto pen should be banned if the POTUS himself in person cannot sign it and know exactly what he is signing then it shouldn't be allowed !! Plus there is the chance that someone other than the POTUS could get ahold of it like in this case and sign things without the true consent of the president and that should be a jailable offense !! This is the POTUS not some corner store accepting a delivery !! 2
CoudyBills Posted Wednesday at 12:54 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:54 AM On 3/16/2025 at 2:08 AM, The Frankish Reich said: I think it shouldn't count unless the president signed with a quill pen and an ink bottle. No sharpies in 1789. That's a little extreme, but I would vote for that if it meant the president was always the one signing the document I guess. 1
Westside Posted Wednesday at 01:04 AM Posted Wednesday at 01:04 AM Can you imagine the hand waving and cries from the mountain tops if President Trump did that!? The leftists would be crying a river if he did that. But since it’s a dummycrat who did it, no big deal. You can’t despise the traitorous leftists enough’ 1
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 05:48 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:48 PM 9 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Time to start arresting people
BillsFanNC Posted Wednesday at 05:52 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 05:52 PM Get ready for the cries Trump's DOJ is engaging in lawfare! The iron law. For investigating who controlled the highest office in the land while the "elected" POTUS was an empty vessel. 1
B-Man Posted Wednesday at 09:09 PM Posted Wednesday at 09:09 PM I would say, “How much worse can it get?” but, you know, let’s not dare them. The Biden Autopen Scandal May Be Getting Worse. A leading pro-energy watchdog is once again raising the alarm over a series of Biden administration “climate change” executive actions that may not just be disastrous policy; they may also be outright illegitimate. As has previously reported, Joe Biden’s White House frequently used an autopen to sign executive orders and pardons, which raised serious doubts about whether Biden was even involved in the process. Power the Future, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting American energy jobs, believes it has found at least eight examples. In March, the Oversight Project dropped a bombshell memo detailing 32 instances where the Biden White House used an autopen to sign off on clemency warrants — pardons and commutations that impacted thousands, including preemptive pardons for members of the January 6 Committee. While Biden spoke publicly about pardoning the J6 committee, Power the Future’s review found no evidence that Biden ever publicly acknowledged eight executive orders that marked major shifts in U.S. energy policy, which suggests that staff may have quietly pushed them through by autopen, without his awareness or involvement. If that’s the case, it’s not just a procedural scandal; it’s a constitutional one. And it begs the most disturbing question of all: who’s really in charge, and what else are they signing behind closed doors? "These are not obscure bureaucratic memos; these were foundational shifts in American energy policy, yet not once did Joe Biden speak about them publicly," Daniel Turner, the founder and executive director of Power The Future, told Fox News Digital. "During the Biden administration, hundreds of billions of dollars were funneled towards pet green projects, while the American fossil fuels industry was punished, and there is no evidence that Biden ordered it, directed it, or was even aware it was happening in his name," Turner added. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/05/28/the-biden-autopen-scandal-just-got-worse-n4940224 1
B-Man Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Turns out that once again, we evil, traitorous conspiracy theorists were right. Check this out: Say it with us ... DUH. https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/05/29/biden-had-no-knowledge-of-several-eos-signed-in-his-name-n2413490
Westside Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago The traitorous left have been very quiet on this subject. Interesting.
Recommended Posts