Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

The epstein issue wasn't bn the bill for this vote!  It never made it out of committee.  What about that do you not understand.  Chip Roy's abstention killed it.  f'in pu$$y.


 

What do you not understand about that happening yesterday???

 

 

I’m responding to the low info posts that think TODAY around 2pm they voted specifically on the Epstein files per the social media posts and news headlines to make you think that’s what happened.  
 

There was no House vote specifically on the Epstein Files.  
 

There was a vote on the Genius Bill.  That’s what they voted NO on.  
 

 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

What do you not understand about that happening yesterday???

 

 

I’m responding to the low info posts that think TODAY around 2pm they voted specifically on the Epstein files per the social media posts and news headlines to make you think that’s what happened.  
 

There was no House vote specifically on the Epstein Files.  
 

There was a vote on the Genius Bill.  That’s what they voted NO on.  
 

 

yes, they voted no on the Genius bill without the amendment.  Your posts (reposts) imply that the epstein amendment somehow killed the bill.  it didn't.  They voted that out separately and before the final vote on the Genius bill .  nor did the Genius bill kill the amendment.  Chip Roy and the other R's on the committee did.

 

In short, the epstein amendment association is a convoluted falsehood aimed to deceive low info voters.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted

Seems like Trump truly knows how stupid his base is. 
 

“And I would say that, you know, these files were made up by [former FBI Director James] Comey, they were made up by Obama, they were made up by the Biden, you know. And we went through years of that with the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, with all the different things that we had to go through, we’ve gone through years of it. But she’s handled it very well, and it’s gonna be up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release.”

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Every worthless liberal until last week:

 

 


 

God this all better be Trump knowing full well these idiots support the opposite of everything he supports.  
 

They ignored the Biden laptop despite all the attention MAGA was giving it.  

 

Now he’s got them all in to release Epstein files they would have ignored and downplayed if they just released them no controversy.   
 

Unleash hell.  

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, Homelander said:

⬆️ The MAGA meltdown continues. Cope. Seethe. Rinse. Repeat. &nbsp⬆️

 

 


 

They are busy altering them for their ######ed base …..

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, ComradeKayAdams said:

 

You cheeky son of a b!tch… Big boy Leh-nerd presumes to have big boy political thoughts for Commie Kay. How adorable. Almost makes me want to pinch those cheeks. Or rather, PUNCH IN those cheeks…

 

YET ANOTHER EMERGENCY MATH POP QUIZ FOR LEH-NERD SKIN-ERD (because the forum friendship between Kay and Leh-nerd is once again in peril):

 

Q1. Kay orders 10 “Hot Girls for Zohran” t-shirts online: 2 red, 2 yellow, 2 blue, 2 grey, and 2 white. Kay makes this purchase with Leh-nerd’s credit card that she stole from his wallet following a violent altercation. Upon delivery, Kay modifies one shirt of each color into a cute crop top style.

 

Because of the aforementioned violent altercation in the state of New York, Kay decides to pack her sh!t up ASAP and lie low in sunny San Diego with Muppy for 5 days. Kay also immediately adopts Leh-nerd’s unethical omnivore diet so that she can go “incognito mode” and quickly raise her svelte 19.3 BMI to Leh-nerd’s sloppy 24.8.

 

If Kay wants to wear a unique “Hot Girls for Zohran” shirt style for each day of her 5-day fugitive excursion, how many different combinations of t-shirts can she pack?

 

Note: you may or may not need to recall Stokes’s Theorem for conservative vector fields: the line integral of the vector field around any closed curve is ZERO.

 

Q2. Kay calls a criminal audible and now intends to clean up the scene of the aforementioned bloody altercation before fleeing the state. She uses bleach plus all 5 crop tops as wash rags in some manner. How many different combinations of t-shirts will Kay now be able to pack?

 

Please take my quiz seriously this time, Leh-nerd. Our forum friendship hangs in the very balance…

 

CKA-148.jpg

Answer to Q1:  Irrelevant. The T-shirt likely was made in China.  #irony #hotgirlssupportingservitude  Beyond that, he definitely seems to be interested in her vector fields, but it has in has nothing to do with the t-shirt.  Overalls from Walmart  and golf shoes would probably work just as well. I can’t speak to closed curves, I’m a gentleman first. 
 

Answer to Q2:  Doesn’t matter. When you buy cheap goods from far-off lands, your emotional baggage is packed with shame and self-loathing. 
 

Oh—had to visit the doctor a couple weeks back.  The nurse asked me to step in the scale, shoes and all, and recorded my weight. Checking my records, I see they logged in my weight fully clothed.  Pushed my BMI over 25.  I may find a new doctor. Complete b-s. 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Shocked 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

Seems like Trump truly knows how stupid his base is. 
 

“And I would say that, you know, these files were made up by [former FBI Director James] Comey, they were made up by Obama, they were made up by the Biden, you know. And we went through years of that with the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, with all the different things that we had to go through, we’ve gone through years of it. But she’s handled it very well, and it’s gonna be up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release.”

He's the PT Barnum of US politics.  Who knew someone would cash in on the growing ignorance of the populace?

Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I don’t know how to

make it make sense to you, Mup.  I’ll try, but it seems you’re hunkered down on this one.

 

Politicians, leaders in the house and senate, certain media members and the like lie.  They view facts as pliable, manipulate details as they feel warranted and push on.    I think this perspective is centrist, not particularly earth shattering, and shared by the majority of Americans.   

 

Lies hang with the truth everyday in DC politics.  It’s the standard for any variety of reasons.  You hold your nose when your people do it, I hold my nose when the people I support do it, and we move forward.   
 

If there is a deep, legitimate cover up it will reflect business as usual.   But if there is a deep, legitimate coverup it didn’t  start at the inauguration of DJT in January.   Might I add, if you feel it now, and felt it then, why weren’t you pounding the table when Garland’s DOJ sat on their hands?  That’s a rhetorical question and ties back in to holding noses when the favored people hold office. 
 

Let’s be real here indeed.  The Trump admin botched the handling of all this, and Bondi has to answer for it.  Heavy lies the crown.   As far as a list goes (and assuming some credible list with names, dates and details ever existed) I’m sorry, but assuming that list wasn’t scrubbed, reviewed, manipulated, changed, deleted or otherwise altered during the Biden/Garland years makes little sense to me.  It’s difficult for me to generate much outrage simply because some liberal leader had a bad case of Rip Van Winkle Syndrome for the past half-decade and suddenly found The Lord on 1/20/25.  
 

Why is it gone, if it ever existed?  Easiest question of the day—Power corrupts. Victimizers victimize.  Some people are above the law.  

 


 

 

good morning 🙂

 

You gave me an answer very well suited to a person who regularly chats in PPP. a ton of extraneous details relating to  DC politics in general.

 

The things is, the crux of the matter . for ME.  to me this is Not a gray area. Black or white.

 

I could go back and retweet regarding how a list exists and now it doesn't

 

which is true and which is a Lie?

 

why must things always get so complicated. Brass Tacks.

 

No List ever or List did exist?

 

Which is it?

 

 

Edited by muppy
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, muppy said:

good morning 🙂

 

You gave me an answer very well suited to a person who regularly chats in PPP. a ton of extraneous details relating to  DC politics in general.

 

The things is, the crux of the matter . for ME.  to me this is Not a gray area. Black or white.

 

I could go back and retweet regarding how a list exists and now it doesn't

 

which is true and which is a Lie?

 

why must things always get so complicated. Brass Tacks.

 

No List ever or List did exist?

 

Which is it?

 

 

They won't tell you.  And they won't release the information.  For years Democrats have been called pedophiles and accused of pedophilia.  Now, when it's put up or shut up time, it looks like MAGA is the group protecting pedos.  

Posted
9 minutes ago, muppy said:

good morning 🙂

 

You gave me an answer very well suited to a person who regularly chats in PPP. a ton of extraneous details relating to  DC politics in general.

 

The things is, the crux of the matter . for ME.  to me this is Not a gray area. Black or white.

 

I could go back and retweet regarding how a list exists and now it doesn't

 

which is true and which is a Lie?

 

why must things always get so complicated. Brass Tacks.

 

No List ever or List did exist?

 

Which is it?

Ah, there you go.  If one is concerned with list/no list, it’s interesting this issue spans two diff admins.  There’s no gray area to me. I see it like this:

 

There are no tellers of truth we can rely on. 
People will leverage the known/unknown to their advantage.

People with power will scrub damaging information. 
The truth will never really be known. 
 

—or—-

 

We know the truth. No list. No suicide. 
 

I’m in the first camp.  I won’t lose any sleep over it. 

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ah, there you go.  If one is concerned with list/no list, it’s interesting this issue spans two diff admins.  There’s no gray area to me. I see it like this:

 

There are no tellers of truth we can rely on. 
People will leverage the known/unknown to their advantage.

People with power will scrub damaging information. 
The truth will never really be known. 
 

—or—-

 

We know the truth. No list. No suicide. 
 

I’m in the first camp.  I won’t lose any sleep over it. 

okie dokie. It's a  quandry. It really is. Thanks for the input

 

I'm not losing sleep Im just curious because it's sordid and ugly. It is usually the last type of thing Id focus on

 

it just reinforces my belief El naranja can't be trusted. Not much that he says do I believe

 

I read a quote El presidente saying " the Epstein list its really a boring subject"  LOL well? Clearly members of your own party are calling you out naranja

 

not So BORING to your constoituents

 

It's Unprecedeented. I really think so. This is no bueno

 

I think it is a stinking lying mess

 

PS: This is some tough terrritory even for Donald amigo. This lie isn't being glossed over. at all.

 

PSS: HOW can you be so sure No List no suicide? actually never mind, this is giving me a headache I don't need

44 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

They won't tell you.  And they won't release the information.  For years Democrats have been called pedophiles and accused of pedophilia.  Now, when it's put up or shut up time, it looks like MAGA is the group protecting pedos.  

that's the rhetoric. It's really stinking bad all of it.

 

this is NOT MAGA

 

Hello

 

@-@

Edited by muppy
Posted
1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

He's the PT Barnum of US politics.  Who knew someone would cash in on the growing ignorance of the populace?

 

You voted for a guy with dementia and want to call other people ignorant. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, muppy said:

okie dokie. It's a  quandry. It really is. Thanks for the input

 

I'm not losing sleep Im just curious because it's sordid and ugly. It is usually the last type of thing Id focus on

 

it just reinforces my belief El naranja can't be trusted. Not much that he says do I believe

 

I read a quote El presidente saying " the Epstein list its really a boring subject"  LOL well? Clearly members of your own party are calling you out naranja

 

not So BORING to your constoituents

 

It's Unprecedeented. I really think so. This is no bueno

 

I think it is a stinking lying mess

 

PS: This is some tough terrritory even for Donald amigo. This lie isn't being glossed over. at all.

 

PSS: HOW can you be so sure No List no suicide? actually never mind, this is giving me a headache. 

I’m not trying to convince you, Mup, and respect your opinion.  The remark about losing sleep was not meant to imply you were, it’s just where I’m at. 
 

Still….i think you’re taking two separate issues and combing them into one. 
 

Issue 1:  Epstein and all he represents.  You’re focusing on El Naranja (just found out what that means!) yet imo, a reasonable person should also question the actions of Tapones para el pelo Mr. and Ensalada de la señora Word (apologies if Google translate let me down here).   Again, this applies only if you believe a list of powerful people exists and is being kept from the public.   That said, I do understand your distrust of President Trump.  
 

Issue 2.  DJTs handling of the saga post  1/20/25.   
 

As I said, I believe he’s handling this poorly.  We’ll see what happens and how it impacts him moving forward. 

 

Finally, I’m completely uncertain on the suicide issue.  In some ways, it reminds me of the Trump assassination attempt in Pa—it was so comically bad and incompetent if it was a set up that it’s hard to believe it was a set up.  On the other hand, liberal Senator Chuck Schumer has assured us that the intelligence agency has six ways from Sunday to get someone.  🤷‍♂️

 

19 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

 

You voted for a guy with dementia and want to call other people ignorant. 

It wasn’t just voting though.  It was the resolute belief in Biden and his handlers over nearly 4 full years as he deteriorated in front of our eyes.   Then again, these folks were indignant about national security and classified documents until quite predictably their guy had a treasure trove.  Then, someone suggested “slippage” and they did an about face. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

He's the PT Barnum of US politics.  Who knew someone would cash in on the growing ignorance of the populace?

 

Yes the real shocking truth is that America's critical thinking skills are allowing something of this magnitude to take place.  

30 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

 

You voted for a guy with dementia and want to call other people ignorant. 

 

You worship a pedophile dictator.  Who ***** cares about dementia.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

 

You voted for a guy with dementia and want to call other people ignorant. 

you voted for a guy with physical and psychiatric infirmity.

https://www.themirror.com/news/us-news/donald-trumps-swollen-ankles-spark-1269159

 

and unlike Biden's  neurologic condition, trump's narcissistic personality disorder was pre existing.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

 

You voted for a guy with dementia and want to call other people ignorant. 

So did you.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

Yes the real shocking truth is that America's critical thinking skills are allowing something of this magnitude to take place.  

 

You worship a pedophile dictator.  Who ***** cares about dementia.  

I worship no one but God.   

12 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

you voted for a guy with physical and psychiatric infirmity.

https://www.themirror.com/news/us-news/donald-trumps-swollen-ankles-spark-1269159

 

and unlike Biden's  neurologic condition, trump's narcissistic personality disorder was pre existing.

You believe Biden's "neurological condition" just popped up over his last few months in office and wasn't pre-existing?  

 

Maybe he visited a wet market and was infected?

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

You believe Biden's "neurological condition" just popped up over his last few months in office and wasn't pre-existing?  

 

Maybe he visited a wet market and was infected?

We still don't have a definitive diagnosis  (dementia has multiple causes) but dementia follows a slow and progressive course.  https://www.dementiacarecentral.com/aboutdementia/facts/stages/

 

He may have been in stage 1 to 3 on election day 2020 based on his debate performances..  Those stages are extremely difficult to diagnose.  Even stage 3 lasts at least 2 years.

 

No doubt, we should have been told about his decline while in office.  Hiding it was inexcusable.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...