Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • BillsFanNC changed the title to Pete Hegseth: The Josh Allen of Defense (War) Secretaries.
  • BillsFanNC changed the title to Pete Hegseth: The Josh Allen of Department of WAR Secretaries.
Posted

 

 

Hegseth Meant What He Said: Air Force SGT Facing Consequences for Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Death

 

 

Words only have power when backed by action. Yesterday, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced there would be zero tolerance for military members mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

 

Today, those words are being backed by action as an Air Force Master Sergeant is under investigation for what Under Secretary of the Air Force Matt Lohmeier describes as conduct unbecoming of a non-commissioned officer.

 

https://twitchy.com/eric-v/2025/09/13/hegseth-meant-what-he-said-air-force-sgt-facing-consequenses-for-celebrating-charlie-kirks-death-n2418906

 

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

Pentagon seeks Trump approval for first US military execution in 60 years following Fort Hood mass shooting

Nidal Hasan killed 13 people in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting and has exhausted all appeals

By Emma Bussey , Jasmine Baehr 

 

During his subsequent trial, Hasan admitted to the shooting and claimed it was necessary to protect the "Islamic Empire" from American forces.

 

The Pentagon had categorized the massacre as an act of "workplace violence," a decision that drew sharp criticism from lawmakers, victims’ families and national security experts. They argued it obscured the ideological and terrorist motivations behind the attack.

 

In 2013, a military jury convicted Hasan and sentenced him to death. 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pentagon-seeks-trump-approval-first-us-military-execution-60-years-fort-hood-mass-shooting

 

,

 

 

Posted (edited)

So I haven’t seen any discussion of superstar Heggy doing this move. Is this their version of when Sadam Hussein did something similar, but maybe without the killing? Maybe it’s just a pep rally to make sure they know woke is out and testosterone is in. Maybe it’s a loyalty test to Trump before the military does something questionable. Whatever it is, it is a bizarre move as it has never been done before and is highly questionable from a security standpoint.

 

Edited by Andy1
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

^^^^^

 


 

MAHER: “Pete Hegseth is summoning hundreds of generals and admirals to Washington. I heard 800 of them from around the world are being summoned to Washington. No one knows why.”

 

MICHAEL SMERCONISH: “I don’t know why people are so unsettled about this. Truly. If it were a corporate CEO saying, I want to have the leadership come together for a skull session, nobody would care. I read those stories very carefully. Like, what the hell am I missing here? I don’t get it — the concern.”

 

MAHER: “I love that. That’s sensible because I read it and, yes, I think I got scared because they wanted me to be scared.”


 

More like they wanted fake outrage, autocracy, blah blah losers blah blah. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Andy1 said:

Whatever it is, it is a bizarre move as it has never been done before and is highly questionable from a security standpoint.

Anything never done before automatically qualifies as “bizarre”? If not, what specifically makes it bizarre?

 

What makes it highly questionable from a security standpoint? Are you thinking of a terrorist attack on a marine base? 

Posted
5 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Anything never done before automatically qualifies as “bizarre”? If not, what specifically makes it bizarre?

 

What makes it highly questionable from a security standpoint? Are you thinking of a terrorist attack on a marine base? 

Well, I one accepts the definition of bizarre as something highly unusual, this pow-wow would qualify. Especially when the military has secure channels of remote communication. From a frequency standpoint, it’s more bizarre than a parade of drag queens. It’s a move dictators have done in the past. Wouldn’t that spike your curiosity? 
 

As far as security goes, Hegseth does not inspire confidence as a leader. He is a reverse DEI hire. If the top of every sector of our military is at a meeting, presumably they are not at their normal stations of duty doing what they do. That is a vulnerability. And yes, their attendance at the same location is also a vulnerability, not so much for a conventional attack but rather other novel types of attacks. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Andy1 said:

Well, I one accepts the definition of bizarre as something highly unusual, this pow-wow would qualify. Especially when the military has secure channels of remote communication. From a frequency standpoint, it’s more bizarre than a parade of drag queens. It’s a move dictators have done in the past. Wouldn’t that spike your curiosity? 
 

As far as security goes, Hegseth does not inspire confidence as a leader. He is a reverse DEI hire. If the top of every sector of our military is at a meeting, presumably they are not at their normal stations of duty doing what they do. That is a vulnerability. And yes, their attendance at the same location is also a vulnerability, not so much for a conventional attack but rather other novel types of attacks.

 

not at their normal stations…lol. I believe adaptation is central to mission success. I suspect the chain of command will stay intact long enough for you to not be overly concerned over this bizarre gathering. 
 

Watch the video of Smerconish and Maher and ask yourself if it applies to you. 

  • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...