TH3 Posted August 20 Posted August 20 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: How is it possible? This is how... I mean…you still think Trump won in 2020….right?
Homelander Posted August 23 Posted August 23 On 3/17/2024 at 9:24 AM, BillsFanNC said: Another day, more egregious media lies. Imagine dedicating your life and an army of bots to defending pedophiles 24/7. That’s this guy. ⬆️
Orlando Buffalo Posted November 10 Posted November 10 How do you know Dems are pedophiles? They consider keeping booked where sex is a major component of the plot line away for children a "ban". Literally the book is at every store and grown up library but it is "banned" 1
B-Man Posted November 11 Posted November 11 JUST IN TIME FOR VETERAN'S DAY. Another easily refuted hoax.
B-Man Posted November 12 Posted November 12 (edited) The next BIG Hoax And it's not like Giuffre was afraid of naming names when she was alive. Total nothing burger of a story. . Edited November 13 by B-Man
B-Man Posted November 13 Posted November 13 Democrats Released Three Cherrypicked Epstein Emails, so the GOP Released 20,000 Matt Margolis Democrats thought they had a winning hand when they released three carefully selected Jeffrey Epstein emails on Wednesday morning. The timing was no accident. With their caucus still reeling from their base turning on them for caving on the government shutdown, they needed a distraction, and they believed these emails would deliver one. They were wrong. The so-called bombshell consisted of three email exchanges. The crown jewel of their selective leak was a 2011 email between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in which Epstein described Trump as "the dog that hasn't barked." He noted that a victim had spent hours with Trump at Epstein’s house. Democrats redacted the victim's name in their release, but we know exactly who they were talking about: Virginia Giuffre. The reason for the redaction becomes clear when you learn what Giuffre has actually said under oath. She has testified that she never witnessed Trump engage in any wrongdoing. She stated that Trump never acted inappropriately with her, that she never saw Trump and Epstein together, and that she never saw Trump at any of Epstein's homes. Her memoir reinforces this point, making abundantly clear that Trump had zero involvement in Epstein's illegal activities. The emails were quickly revealed to be exactly what they appeared to be: a nothingburger. Even the media couldn't deny it. But here's where it gets interesting. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee decided to respond by releasing the entire trove of 20,000 documents they obtained from the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. All of them. Every single page. And according to the New York Times, Democrats were livid: https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/11/12/democrats-released-three-cherrypicked-epstein-emails-so-the-gop-released-20000-n4945930 https://oversight.house.gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-additional-epstein-estate-documents/ https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/11/12/us/epstein-files-trump#heres-the-latest 1
B-Man Posted November 13 Posted November 13 Democrats Were Given a Chance to Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is on Epstein Files – Guess What Happened by Rusty Weiss Republican Rep. Tim Burchett (TN-18) offered up a softball pitch to Democrats suddenly clamoring for public transparency regarding the Jeffrey Epstein files. They whiffed worse than the Mighty Casey. Why? Because it's all a political ploy meant to take down their nemesis, President Donald Trump. As reported Wednesday, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee genuinely thought they finally had Trump cornered when it came to the Epstein files. They released a trove of 20,000 documents from the late sex-trafficker's estate, then honed in on three particular out-of-context emails which, in their minds, showed something nefarious. Instead, it blew up spectacularly when it was discovered that the emails had redacted any mention of the "victim" in the case, who happened to be Virginia Giuffre. That move was intentional. Giuffre had stated under oath that Trump never acted inappropriately with her and that she never saw him with Epstein. "Democrats and their lackeys in the media are painting these emails as 'bombshell' revelations," Van Laar writes, "but all they reveal is how desperate the Democrats are and again demonstrate how low they'll go." It took less than a 24-hour news cycle for the Democrats' big bombshell to fall through. It'd be hilarious if it weren't so sad. That said, Burchett, emboldened by his colleagues across the aisle's newfound interest in the Epstein files, decided to allow them the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. He went to the House floor and requested unanimous consent (UC) — a procedural move that would have fast-tracked the release of all remaining Jeffrey Epstein files. Democrats, instead, shriveled up faster than George Costanza after a swim in the pool. .
B-Man Posted November 15 Posted November 15 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: EPSTEIN!!!!!!!! That hoax is all they got. 1
B-Man Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago Democrats Aren't Even Trying to Hide That They Are Just Making Up Hoaxes David Strom A lot of conservatives think that Jasmine Crockett was humiliated by our proving that she slandered Lee Zeldin by claiming he took money from Jeffrey Epstein. Zeldin indeed received a contribution from a man named Jeffrey Epstein, but not the Jeffrey Epstein we're all talking about. It was a sly slander, and she was, in fact, not at all humiliated or embarrassed. She was proud because more people heard her smear than that it was a lie. Conservatives still believe that facts and a passing relationship to reality matter in political fights with Democrats. We are wrong. They are immersed in Critical Theory, which holds that everything is a "narrative," and "narratives" are simply a means to gain power over others. Every utterance is a power play, so they utter what they believe will get them power. Hence, Crockett has no shame. Instead, she is smirking about it. It is a fool's errand to believe a single thing a Leftist says. Some Democrats who are liberals will tell the truth as they see it, but anybody who is a leftist is almost by definition a liar in the terms that we understand. They may or may not be imparting facts at times, but nothing they say is not part of a power play. That is the purpose of speech. I bring all this up because of another horrific slander, and another Jasmine Crockett-style "clarification." It comes from Minnesota's own transgender leftist sexual deviant child-grooming State Legislator Leigh Finke. Finke is a grotesque simulacrum of a female who has pushed horrific legislation intended to groom children into sterilization, mutilation, and sexual promiscuity. {snip} Harry Reid famously accused Mitt Romney of failing to pay his taxes—an accusation he made up out of whole cloth. After the election, when it was proven to be entirely false, he was asked why he did it. His answer was simple: "Romney didn't win, did he? It is a mistake to take anything said by leftists as an expression of what they believe, because they quite literally believe that language exists to be a weapon in the search for power. Concepts are tools, words are weapons, and normies exist to be manipulated. Everything is a hoax. https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/11/21/democrats-arent-even-trying-to-hide-that-they-are-just-making-up-hoaxes-n3809162 .
Recommended Posts