Big Blitz Posted August 7 Author Posted August 7 On 11/3/2023 at 11:37 AM, OrangeBills said: That is an awesome ad. Poor guy is joining the wrong side, strategically, per se, but no doubt he'll do right by all of us by all accounts. He's not the problem here. Unless he becomes some insane lockstep voter who says yes everytime some moronic Leftist asks for more money or some stupid law Yep. And he lost 66 to 33 percent to the Republican. Democrats take that and say “see, that’s why we need to run terrorists SYMPATHIZERS not guys that got coins for killing the bad guys duh.”
stevestojan Posted August 7 Posted August 7 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: My favorite part of this thread: NOT ONE post by a Commie here showing us the “good” the Democrats are doing - anywhere circa 2023-2025. NOTHING. Oh come on. That’s an absolutely ridiculous statement. Because if we “commies” (grow up) did give examples of what we consider good, you clearly disagree anyway. But I’ll go. I believe (which means you of course don’t) that the Women’s Health Protection Act was “good.” You will argue it is bad and that the states - including backwards ones like ***** OK - should decide what women’s rights are. Again, that’s one example, and one that you clearly disagree with being “good” as you are better with the fact that women who are raped in Oklahoma and who become pregnant are forced to have the child or travel to a less 1850’s state to have an abortion. Your point is invalid. Just like mine would be if I said republicans can’t show anything “good” because that adjective is 100% subjective and based on one’s own political views and opinions.
Big Blitz Posted August 8 Author Posted August 8 2 hours ago, stevestojan said: Oh come on. That’s an absolutely ridiculous statement. Because if we “commies” (grow up) Ok dude. The 2021 platform calls for “social ownership of major industry and infrastructure,” a second constitutional convention for a “socialist republic,” and policies like abolishing police, prisons, and ICE. The platform’s language, particularly “social ownership of the means of production,” echoes Marxist rhetoric, and the revolutionary rhetoric of a “socialist republic” implicitly means a radical revolutionary restructuring of society. It’s how one would move a Constitutional Republic towards communist society utilizing the democratic institutions at hand. It’s basically Dengist communism. One cannot be involved in such an organization and then fill out all the paperwork to become a legal resident and citizen without committing fraud on those forms. One cannot be actively involved in the DSA and swear allegiance to the United States and its Constitution.
SectionC3 Posted August 8 Posted August 8 Lost the plot. Stop worrying about anything other than the economy and the Epstein files.
Big Blitz Posted August 8 Author Posted August 8 Dam shame. Good thing the people of Chicago only care about the Epstein files.
stevestojan Posted August 8 Posted August 8 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Ok dude. The 2021 platform calls for “social ownership of major industry and infrastructure,” a second constitutional convention for a “socialist republic,” and policies like abolishing police, prisons, and ICE. The platform’s language, particularly “social ownership of the means of production,” echoes Marxist rhetoric, and the revolutionary rhetoric of a “socialist republic” implicitly means a radical revolutionary restructuring of society. It’s how one would move a Constitutional Republic towards communist society utilizing the democratic institutions at hand. It’s basically Dengist communism. One cannot be involved in such an organization and then fill out all the paperwork to become a legal resident and citizen without committing fraud on those forms. One cannot be actively involved in the DSA and swear allegiance to the United States and its Constitution. Unfortunately, I don’t have time to read your entire right wing Twitter feed, but as a commie I will say the first one is extreme. And if you gave me 45 seconds to waste searching “white trash hillbilly Trumpers who now regret their vote or get stumped by basic math,” I would find the extremes on your side too. Difference is I understand that’s the fringe. These tweets are pointless. And you know that. Because the vast majority of both democrats and republicans are “normal” people who you interact with daily. The point you completely ignored in your follow up rant is that we “commies” can’t point to anything good the dems have done. I argued that’s subjective and NOTHING I post you would find good as it goes against your political beliefs; which is wholly understandable. Instead, you went on your biased Twitter feed (as they all are) and posted the extremes. Most dems - and you know this - don’t want “abortions performed in churches” much like I know most republicans aren’t toothless yokels who can’t spell Donald Trump much less explain what a tariff is. But I see you lean more toward BillsFanNC than a guy like Bman or JDHillfan who can have a rationale conversation, so I’m not sure why I ever bother.
Big Blitz Posted August 8 Author Posted August 8 9 minutes ago, stevestojan said: Unfortunately, I don’t have time to read your entire right wing Twitter feed, but as a commie I will say the first one is extreme. And if you gave me 45 seconds to waste searching “white trash hillbilly Trumpers who now regret their vote or get stumped by basic math,” I would find the extremes on your side too. Difference is I understand that’s the fringe. These tweets are pointless. And you know that. Because the vast majority of both democrats and republicans are “normal” people who you interact with daily. The point you completely ignored in your follow up rant is that we “commies” can’t point to anything good the dems have done. I argued that’s subjective and NOTHING I post you would find good as it goes against your political beliefs; which is wholly understandable. Instead, you went on your biased Twitter feed (as they all are) and posted the extremes. Most dems - and you know this - don’t want “abortions performed in churches” much like I know most republicans aren’t toothless yokels who can’t spell Donald Trump much less explain what a tariff is. But I see you lean more toward BillsFanNC than a guy like Bman or JDHillfan who can have a rationale conversation, so I’m not sure why I ever bother. You can post whatever the hell you want if you think it supports your argument. You can post some irrelevant actions of a mayor in the middle of nowhere America and claim “hey look….look at these hillbilly MAGAs.” Cool. Good luck with that. We’re a massive tent that you can’t pin down. I told you the Democrats are full blown socialists now. Then posted about the leading contender for mayor of NYC being a freaking communist 3rd world moron. NEW YORK CITY. And the organization that is churning out this new breed of Ds fully endorsed by their socialist thug enablers/financers. Sorry. What used to be hidden from the public (your party’s communist sympathies and DNA) is now full blown embraced and being run on. Commies. 1
stevestojan Posted August 8 Posted August 8 20 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: You can post whatever the hell you want if you think it supports your argument. You can post some irrelevant actions of a mayor in the middle of nowhere America and claim “hey look….look at these hillbilly MAGAs.” Cool. Good luck with that. We’re a massive tent that you can’t pin down. I told you the Democrats are full blown socialists now. Then posted about the leading contender for mayor of NYC being a freaking communist 3rd world moron. NEW YORK CITY. And the organization that is churning out this new breed of Ds fully endorsed by their socialist thug enablers/financers. Sorry. What used to be hidden from the public (your party’s communist sympathies and DNA) is now full blown embraced and being run on. Commies. “Commies.” Grow up. But it is nice to know if that geriatric freak show BillsFanNC can’t continue his duties, his replacement is at the ready.
Big Blitz Posted August 10 Author Posted August 10 One day it’s “no one is above the law.” The next day “***k the rules.” Your communist party ladies and gentlemen 1
JFKjr Posted August 10 Posted August 10 On 8/7/2025 at 8:12 PM, SectionC3 said: Lost the plot. Stop worrying about anything other than the economy and the Epstein files. Great! Two topics you're fabulously uninformed on.
Big Blitz Posted August 11 Author Posted August 11 Omg. This actually perfectly sums up any “debate” with a liberal. 1
B-Man Posted August 11 Posted August 11 ANALYSIS: TRUE. Profanity Won’t Save a Party That’s Out of Coherent Arguments. Once, not too long ago, people with ideas aspired to enter politics by presenting their ideas, which were debated during rallies and speeches. Worthy candidates laid out a map to follow for election, and voters judged the best route. Within the past year, many high-profile Democrats have replaced maps with megaphones and words that would make World War II-era merchant marines proud, remaining confident that their volume equaled clarity, while anger equaled authenticity. Although rhetorical shifts such as these grab attention for a single moment, the speakers never learned the lesson that attention without persuasion turns into nothing but a noisy treadmill. Profanity signals emotion, and emotion sells in an algorithmic marketplace. Strategists, using lessons learned from trials long ago, know that a jolt of outrage can feel like action, an addictive sensation during tight news cycles, especially when news cycles are particularly tense, as when a party struggles to articulate fixes for inflation, border security, urban disorder, and classroom decline. Microphones amplify syllables because a governing coalition needs sentences that add up to a plan. {snip} Final Thoughts Words serve as our political currency; spend them wisely to purchase trust, organize confidence, and build coalitions that are built to survive the next storm. Recklessly spend, and you end up broke, chasing virality because governing results never arrive. Many Democrats proudly wear profanity like a varsity letter, sure that a little attitude replaces answers. Voters paying mortgages, filling lunch boxes, and navigating violent city blocks beg for results instead of dirty speeches. Governments can't cuss a budget into balance, schools can't curse reading scores to rise, and borders aren't secured by spicing up nouns and verbs. https://pjmedia.com/david-manney/2025/08/10/profanity-wont-save-a-party-thats-out-of-coherent-arguments-n4942570 1
Pokebball Posted August 11 Posted August 11 20 minutes ago, B-Man said: ANALYSIS: TRUE. Profanity Won’t Save a Party That’s Out of Coherent Arguments. Once, not too long ago, people with ideas aspired to enter politics by presenting their ideas, which were debated during rallies and speeches. Worthy candidates laid out a map to follow for election, and voters judged the best route. Within the past year, many high-profile Democrats have replaced maps with megaphones and words that would make World War II-era merchant marines proud, remaining confident that their volume equaled clarity, while anger equaled authenticity. Although rhetorical shifts such as these grab attention for a single moment, the speakers never learned the lesson that attention without persuasion turns into nothing but a noisy treadmill. Profanity signals emotion, and emotion sells in an algorithmic marketplace. Strategists, using lessons learned from trials long ago, know that a jolt of outrage can feel like action, an addictive sensation during tight news cycles, especially when news cycles are particularly tense, as when a party struggles to articulate fixes for inflation, border security, urban disorder, and classroom decline. Microphones amplify syllables because a governing coalition needs sentences that add up to a plan. {snip} Final Thoughts Words serve as our political currency; spend them wisely to purchase trust, organize confidence, and build coalitions that are built to survive the next storm. Recklessly spend, and you end up broke, chasing virality because governing results never arrive. Many Democrats proudly wear profanity like a varsity letter, sure that a little attitude replaces answers. Voters paying mortgages, filling lunch boxes, and navigating violent city blocks beg for results instead of dirty speeches. Governments can't cuss a budget into balance, schools can't curse reading scores to rise, and borders aren't secured by spicing up nouns and verbs. https://pjmedia.com/david-manney/2025/08/10/profanity-wont-save-a-party-thats-out-of-coherent-arguments-n4942570 A long time criticism I've had of Trump are is crude, nonpresidential, words and tweets. Dems must have decided that this demeanor was his path to winning and have adopted it, and even double downed using it. Holy Cow!!! 1 1
Recommended Posts