Frez Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Guilty or not guilty? I'm saying GUILTY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Plastic Cup Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 He's as guilty as a thug basketball player attacking innocent fans. But he won't be convicted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 He will probably get off, but he is as guilty as sin. He fits the profile to a tee....showing the kids porno, giving them booze and gifts, etc. One thing....if he IS convicted, look for the judge to give him a surprisingly long sentence. He made a mockery of the court, and judges do not respond well to this, believe me. Then again if he is convicted, maybe he will kill himself before sentencing. That would be upsetting. Can you feel it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Fry him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Fry him. 350721[/snapback] mmmmmm... fried plastic... yummy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 I'd be really really surprised if he gets convicted of anything. The prosecution made fools of themselves in this case. In the end, all their arguments boiled down to "aw, come on, he's guilty--he's such a weirdo, he must be guilty." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 The prosecution are idiots for using a family of sleazebags as the accusers. Jacko is gonna moonwalk! PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF Bills Fan Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 He'll walk. I just wish he would disappear forever. I hate hearing about him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 They've already said he'll get a convection for serving alcohol to minors. He can get up to a year in jail on that one. I hope the put him away for a long time. I think its an 8 woman and 4 man jury. Not sure of the racial breakdown. Either way the race card will come flying out for something when the verdict is read, just a guess though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantrules Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 They've already said he'll get a convection for serving alcohol to minors. He can get up to a year in jail on that one. I hope the put him away for a long time. I think its an 8 woman and 4 man jury. Not sure of the racial breakdown. Either way the race card will come flying out for something when the verdict is read, just a guess though. 350735[/snapback] unfortunately, Michael won't know which side he's on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF Bills Fan Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 unfortunately, Michael won't know which to side he's on. 350737[/snapback] Yeah, the white women will sympathize cause he's now of their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Yeah, the white women will sympathize cause he's now of their own. 350743[/snapback] I thought he was Asian now.....oh well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 He will probably get off...350718[/snapback] Judging by the boy's testimony, he already has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted June 3, 2005 Author Share Posted June 3, 2005 I think I might have a sleepover tonight and invite all the neighborhood boys under the age of 12. I'll be sleeping in my silk boxers with holes in the front and back! Is that just wrong or what? He's a SICK BASTARD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Guilty or not guilty? I'm saying GUILTY! 350713[/snapback] Did he do it? Probably. Will he be found guilty? Hardly even matters; the prosecution of his case was SO !@#$ed up, even if the jury returns a guilty verdict, there's PLENTY of room for reversal on appeal (for example: the judge's permitting the prosecution to introduce improper testimony intended not to prove the charges but impeach the defendant's character and unfairly bias the jury). If I had to give odds...I wouldn't on the verdict; either the jury's smart and realizes the prosecution never proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt and tried to hide that failure behind a smokescreen of improper "Well...he's a freak!" testimony, or they're stupid and say "Well, he's guilty...because he's a freak!" I will say that he's unlikely to server even a day of jail time, as the only think he's likely to be found guilty of is serving alcohol to a minor, a misdemeanor, and anything else is liable to be reversed on appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB27 Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 I'd be really really surprised if he gets convicted of anything. The prosecution made fools of themselves in this case. In the end, all their arguments boiled down to "aw, come on, he's guilty--he's such a weirdo, he must be guilty." 350729[/snapback] This might actually work in this case. He is guilty as hell. A few jokes,,,,, How can you tell that MJ has guests at the ranch? . . . . . . By all the big wheels parked out front. What did the young boys father say to MJ while at the beach? . . . . . . . Can you please move, you're in my son..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Guilty or not guilty? I'm saying GUILTY! 350713[/snapback] WEIRD?? OF COURSE.. GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT AFTER BEING ACCUSED BY PROFESSIONAL GRIFTERS?? NO..they have no evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 WEIRD?? OF COURSE.. GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT AFTER BEING ACCUSED BY PROFESSIONAL GRIFTERS?? NO..they have no evidence 350893[/snapback] Would you let him sleep with your children? You're an idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Would you let him sleep with your children?You're an idiot 350895[/snapback] Hey don't throw 'idiot' around like that.Doesn't make you a big man.. Of course I wouldnt let him sleep with my kids.I was commenting on the legal part of the question. They have testimony of professional grifters and losers...thats why they won't convict him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Hey don't throw 'idiot' around like that.Doesn't make you a big man.. Of course I wouldnt let him sleep with my kids.I was commenting on the legal part of the question. They have testimony of professional grifters and losers...thats why they won't convict him. 350901[/snapback] Ok, it just seemed like you wanted to go to bed with him, my fault. Fag............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts