Doc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 30 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: The last time I checked, those cities were still there So is the Capitol. In fact it's even more secure than its ever been. Can't say the same about those cities... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Doc said: So is the Capitol. In fact it's even more secure than its ever been. Can't say the same about those cities... Yeah, but nobody’s saying that people destroyed the capital Are you even listening to what you’re typing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) 2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Yeah, but nobody’s saying that people destroyed the capital Are you even listening to what you’re typing? Did you see what happened to those cities during the Summer of 2020? The "mostly peaceful protests" with fires raging behind reporters, stores being looted and people being injured or killed? Billions of dollars in damage. That's what I mean by "destroyed," John. Edited January 4 by Doc 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 12 hours ago, Doc said: What ruling? What dictatorial things are you thinking he's going to do (that he didn't do the first time)? Dems are always saying that Trump/Repubs will end democracy. Again he specifically said "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." That sentence didn't make it into his speech by accident. As i wrote earlier "Let's say Trump becomes President and does something unconstitutional and the Supreme Court declares it so. Then suppose Trump disregards the Supreme Court, which he would. All of his supporters in Congress would back Trump. The Supreme Court has no way of enforcing their verdict. That's when you have a dictatorship". Again, if Trump disregards ANY Supreme Court ruling, what would stop him? It took me a while to understand that Trumpers will support anything he were to do. Would you prefer Orban or the loon from Argentina to what we currently have? 9 hours ago, John from Riverside said: Literally, none of you answered my question They never answer. It would reveal too much about them. 7 hours ago, Doc said: So is the Capitol. In fact it's even more secure than its ever been. Can't say the same about those cities... What is the reason that the Capitol is more secure than ever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 Alan is terrified that his name will be on that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 hours ago, Kemp said: As i wrote earlier "Let's say Trump becomes President and does something unconstitutional and the Supreme Court declares it so. Then suppose Trump disregards the Supreme Court, which he would. All of his supporters in Congress would back Trump. The Supreme Court has no way of enforcing their verdict. That's when you have a dictatorship". Again, if Trump disregards ANY Supreme Court ruling, what would stop him? It took me a while to understand that Trumpers will support anything he were to do. You gave no specific example, just a vague "what if he does this?!!!!!!!" It's more of the same bull#### we heard prior to 2017. 3 hours ago, Kemp said: What is the reason that the Capitol is more secure than ever? Because of what happened on J6 obviously, thanks to the the pathetic lack of security provided that day despite advanced warning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Doc said: You gave no specific example, just a vague "what if he does this?!!!!!!!" It's more of the same bull#### we heard prior to 2017. something unconstitutional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 16 minutes ago, Doc said: You gave no specific example, just a vague "what if he does this?!!!!!!!" It's more of the same bull#### we heard prior to 2017. Because of what happened on J6 obviously, thanks to the the pathetic lack of security provided that day despite advanced warning. I have to give the specifics of what Trump might do for you to have an opinion? Let's try and make it simpler for you. If ANY President did something that the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional, how would the Supreme Court enforce it if the President disregarded the ruling? It's outstanding thinking that the J6 violence that Trump watched on TV for 3 hours without intervening is someone else's fault. You really are an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 35 minutes ago, Kemp said: I have to give the specifics of what Trump might do for you to have an opinion? Let's try and make it simpler for you. If ANY President did something that the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional, how would the Supreme Court enforce it if the President disregarded the ruling? It's outstanding thinking that the J6 violence that Trump watched on TV for 3 hours without intervening is someone else's fault. You really are an idiot. Let me make it simple for you. What unconstitutional thing did he continue doing despite SCOTUS' ruling the first time? I heard you morons talking about how he'd be a dictator and start WWIII prior to 2017 so that stuff is old. Would he, say, allow an invasion by illegals under the guise of "immunity"? How about continuing to foist student loan forgiveness? And no, Trump didn't watch for 3 hours before intervening. He tweeted something soon after and it was deleted. Not that anyone was listening to him at that point anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 17 minutes ago, Doc said: He tweeted something soon after and it was deleted. Which Tweet are you referencing? https://factba.se/topic/deleted-tweets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Doc said: Let me make it simple for you. What unconstitutional thing did he continue doing despite SCOTUS' ruling the first time? I heard you morons talking about how he'd be a dictator and start WWIII prior to 2017 so that stuff is old. Would he, say, allow an invasion by illegals under the guise of "immunity"? How about continuing to foist student loan forgiveness? And no, Trump didn't watch for 3 hours before intervening. He tweeted something soon after and it was deleted. Not that anyone was listening to him at that point anyway. He tweeted something that he deleted? Hours later he held a press conference where he called the Capitol invaders great people. Before that he was watching on TV with people celebrating what was going on. You keep answering questions that I never asked and avoiding answering the questions I asked. You can't be that stupid, so it's just you being a coward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 hours ago, BillStime said: There any uproar from the right here? This one example will probably have more evidence than anything on Joe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Kemp said: He tweeted something that he deleted? Hours later he held a press conference where he called the Capitol invaders great people. Before that he was watching on TV with people celebrating what was going on. You keep answering questions that I never asked and avoiding answering the questions I asked. You can't be that stupid, so it's just you being a coward. Rioters broke into the Capitol somewhere around 2:11-2:16 PM. Trump tweeted at 2:38: "Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!" Then again at 3:13 he tweeted: "I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!" So much for watching for 3 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 41 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: There any uproar from the right here? This one example will probably have more evidence than anything on Joe. The cult acknowledge this? HAHAHAHAHA 4 minutes ago, Doc said: Rioters broke into the Capitol somewhere around 2:11-2:16 PM Trump tweeted at 2:38: "Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!" Then again at 3:13 he tweeted: "I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!" So much for watching for 3 hours. Not accurate. https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/jan-6-hearings-news-live/card/jan-6-timeline-riot-at-the-capitol-e99jxTMAzv3IB744gZNf https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack#:~:text=At 12%3A49 p.m.%2C Capitol,building through the Columbus Doors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, L Ron Burgundy said: There any uproar from the right here? This one example will probably have more evidence than anything on Joe. No uproar from me. Washington politics. Play on. Are you uproared? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 17 hours ago, Doc said: Did you see what happened to those cities during the Summer of 2020? The "mostly peaceful protests" with fires raging behind reporters, stores being looted and people being injured or killed? Billions of dollars in damage. That's what I mean by "destroyed," John. I understood what you meant, Doc, because I'm a center-right voter. Of course this was horrific, of course people suffered greatly, of course fires raged, of course there were injuries and deaths. What I think @John from Riverside actually meant to say was he didn't really want to talk about this because he doesn't care about any of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 22 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: No uproar from me. Washington politics. Play on. Are you uproared? Glad you ask. I am not. I recognize the crook for what he is and always has been. Using the politics as always excuse is lazy and inaccurate. He's the most crooked politician our country has ever had the misfortune to elect. While the entire Republican party, so far laughably, attacks Joe only a small portion have integrity attack the man child constantly breaking the rules and sometimes the law. He'll get his though. It's coming. I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I understood what you meant, Doc, because I'm a center-right voter. Of course this was horrific, of course people suffered greatly, of course fires raged, of course there were injuries and deaths. What I think @John from Riverside actually meant to say was he didn't really want to talk about this because he doesn't care about any of that. I guess. I'm not sure when "destroyed" meant "obliterated" and the damage, both financial and long-lasting, done during the Summer of 2020 was exponentially higher than on J6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 1 hour ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Glad you ask. I am not. I recognize the crook for what he is and always has been. Using the politics as always excuse is lazy and inaccurate. He's the most crooked politician our country has ever had the misfortune to elect. While the entire Republican party, so far laughably, attacks Joe only a small portion have integrity attack the man child constantly breaking the rules and sometimes the law. He'll get his thought. It's coming. I think. What exactly was inaccurate and lazy about mentioning politics in response to your post citing the comments of political figures, acting as members of a specific political party, about other political figures, where you asked about uproar from one side of the political spectrum? Then, after flipping your gumbo about lazy and inaccurate, you proceed to comment on political parties and politicians. When you go to one of your Michelin restaurants, and the waiter asks you if you would like a drink, do you go on a screed about waiters of restaurants past who forgot to bring you bread? Do you encumber him with your opinion on like, all the worst….restaurants…eveeeerrrrrrrr.? Observationally, sentences 1 and 2 of your reply, no uproar noted. Sentences 3-7, you sounded uproared, a little, just a bit. Maybe. I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts