Tiberius Posted February 7, 2023 Author Share Posted February 7, 2023 That's right. Hitler loved the isolationists. If America had shown leadership in the 30's Hitler would have been deterred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 11 hours ago, reddogblitz said: How could/did the US block an agreement between 2 sovereign countries? By sending Boris Johnson to deliver the message to Zelensky that if he attempts to make a deal with the Russian they'll kill him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: That's right. Hitler loved the isolationists. If America had shown leadership in the 30's Hitler would have been deterred Context. As you appear to be a history buff, you're well aware the world was in the throes of the Great Depression and the US was in no position, socially, economically, or militarily to involve the country in the affairs of other countries. Most Americans understanding the country faced with problems at home, saw no need or reason to intervene. They weren't isolationist but rather people with their own problems that took priority. Also, and most important, before WW2 the US spent about 1% of GDP on defense and ranked 17th in terms of military size. Facts are that America, for all its potential, wasn't a world military leader in the 1930's and people making this argument are projected current US power to act onto the 1930's era where it simply did not exist. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2023 Author Share Posted February 7, 2023 7 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Context. As you appear to be a history buff, you're well aware the world was in the throes of the Great Depression and the US was in no position, socially, economically, or militarily to involve the country in the affairs of other countries. Most Americans understanding the country faced with problems at home, saw no need or reason to intervene. They weren't isolationist but rather people with their own problems that took priority. Also, and most important, before WW2 the US spent about 1% of GDP on defense and ranked 17th in terms of military size. Facts are that America, for all its potential, wasn't a world military leader in the 1930's and people making this argument are projected current US power to act onto the 1930's era where it simply did not exist. But we were isolationist in the prosperous 20's as well. That was just a mistake. Had they taken efforts at some form of collective security, things would have turned out differently, but that was a hard lesson learned. It happened, all we can do is not repeat the mistake Conversely, we have to pick and choose carefully our foreign priorities. Vietnam and Iraq were mistake going in the other direction 17 hours ago, sherpa said: I am not interested in what Ukraine is suggesting. I am interested in how they will be used as an anti missile platform. I am also interested in how it is a good idea to use them on unimproved, Soviet/Russia grid pattern runways, which they are not designed to operate on, and how they will handle the hydrazine issue, peculiar to the F-16. The Swedish Gripen is a much better alternative. Good questions. I was just throwing it out there, not advocating for or against them, wondering how they would be used and the only answer I found was as anti-missile platforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: But we were isolationist in the prosperous 20's as well. That was just a mistake. Had they taken efforts at some form of collective security, things would have turned out differently, but that was a hard lesson learned. It happened, all we can do is not repeat the mistake All I can say is hindsight is 20/20 and we're critiquing people for a lack of action when they were not inclined to perceive or anticipate any action was necessary. I also think the preemptive strike to prevent the next Hitler from taking power theory is a risky speculative bet based on the operating assumption that you can predict with great precision and accuracy what the future holds. And that you can predict with certainty that you're action will prevent some catastrophic outcome in some future time and replace it with a good outcome. A future where there are potentially thousands and thousands of variables almost none of which you can control that might impact the outcome. Ultimately you can't know for certain if you're going to make things better, make them worse, or have no effect. What if you go back to 1928 and kill Hitler and that provides Stalin and the Soviets the opportunity to conquer the entire European continent? Edited February 7, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeesforclosers Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: By sending Boris Johnson to deliver the message to Zelensky that if he attempts to make a deal with the Russian they'll kill him. I googled this claim and found nothing. What's your source? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 24 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said: I googled this claim and found nothing. What's your source? The power of imagination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 41 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said: I googled this claim and found nothing. What's your source? Try Bing. Here's one: https://www.ibtimes.sg/western-bloc-led-by-aggressive-boris-johnson-ruined-russia-ukraine-peace-deal-leading-year-long-68910 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 27 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Try Bing. Here's one: https://www.ibtimes.sg/western-bloc-led-by-aggressive-boris-johnson-ruined-russia-ukraine-peace-deal-leading-year-long-68910 Article doesn't say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeesforclosers Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 17 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Try Bing. Here's one: https://www.ibtimes.sg/western-bloc-led-by-aggressive-boris-johnson-ruined-russia-ukraine-peace-deal-leading-year-long-68910 It does not say Boris Johnson threatened to kill Zelensky if he made peace. It does say Naftali Benett got a promise from Putin that he would stop trying to assassinate Zelensky. Sounds like wires got crossed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2023 Author Share Posted February 7, 2023 Boris Johnson threatened to kill Zelenski...lol 🤣 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 17 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said: It does not say Boris Johnson threatened to kill Zelensky if he made peace. It does say Naftali Benett got a promise from Putin that he would stop trying to assassinate Zelensky. Sounds like wires got crossed? Think he probably meant Putin would keep trying to kill him, though he definitely phrased it like it was Boris, also this still wasn't in the article, either way I'm not sure I'm going to fault them for saying not to trust Putin's word on an agreement considering how he keeps breaking them with them. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 in the 80's the mob learned to speak in person cause the feds were wire tapping them. but their is NO proof they were talking about mob/bad things in those private meetings. Its not like Boris and others would be aware that entities have ways to capture and disclose cables/transmissions 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 31 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said: It does not say Boris Johnson threatened to kill Zelensky if he made peace. It does say Naftali Benett got a promise from Putin that he would stop trying to assassinate Zelensky. Sounds like wires got crossed? Johnson delivered a message which scuttled a peace deal that had an agreement from both sides. Because certain western powers didn't want the war to end. So another 10 months of war and bloodshed so far. Exactly what threats or coercion Boris expressed in communicating the message demanding obedience, use your imagination. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2023 Author Share Posted February 7, 2023 A United States warship, a Destroyer named USS Nitze, was seen to be operating in the Black Sea. This is the closest a US warship has been to Russia since the Russian invasion of Ukraine began. Nitze operates as part of the George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group. The ship entered the region and visited Turkey on February 3rd, which was confirmed on the Twitter account of the US Navy's Sixth Fleet. The US Ambassador to Turkey Jeff Flake and the US Consulate General to Istanbul Julie Eadeh visited the ship for several hours. The ambassador made no connection between the ship’s presence and the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. Rather, Flake described the visit as an opportunity to strengthen a NATO relationship. “Turkey is a highly valued NATO Ally,” Flake said in a Sixth Fleet news release. “Nitze’s visit is an opportunity to further strengthen our long-standing and vital partnership with Turkey.” https://www.jpost.com/international/article-730810 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Boris Johnson threatened to kill Zelenski...lol 🤣 So do you believe the UK or US through their intelligence services have never killed or removed a non-compliant foreign leader? Like when the US executed a coup against Iranian democracy in 1953 because of the threat to nationalize oil interests of American and British corporations. And replaced it with the Shah of Iran, a brutal dictator. Or CIA support for the Chilean military to remove Allende in 1973. Same reason, corporate interests. I could go on and on here. What's amazing is how people of high intelligence with all this information at their disposal refuse to understand that our government, whichever party is in power, works for the Fortune 100. Edited February 7, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2023 Author Share Posted February 7, 2023 8 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: So do you believe the UK or US through their intelligence services have never killed or removed a non-compliant foreign leader? Like when the US executed a coup against Iranian democracy in 1953 because of the threat to nationalize oil interests of American and British corporations. And replaced it with the Shah of Iran, a brutal dictator. Or CIA support for the Chilean military to remove Allende in 1973. Same reason, corporate interests. I could go on and on here. What's amazing is how people of high intelligence with all this information at their disposal refuse to understand that our government, whichever party is in power, works for the Fortune 100. Don't forget Kennedy taking out Diem! But Zalensky is a friend of ours. Trump might like him gone, but not the current leadership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Tiberius said: A United States warship, a Destroyer named USS Nitze, was seen to be operating in the Black Sea. This is the closest a US warship has been to Russia since the Russian invasion of Ukraine began. Nitze operates as part of the George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group. The ship entered the region and visited Turkey on February 3rd, which was confirmed on the Twitter account of the US Navy's Sixth Fleet. The US Ambassador to Turkey Jeff Flake and the US Consulate General to Istanbul Julie Eadeh visited the ship for several hours. The ambassador made no connection between the ship’s presence and the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. Rather, Flake described the visit as an opportunity to strengthen a NATO relationship. “Turkey is a highly valued NATO Ally,” Flake said in a Sixth Fleet news release. “Nitze’s visit is an opportunity to further strengthen our long-standing and vital partnership with Turkey.” https://www.jpost.com/international/article-730810 https://news.usni.org/2014/12/29/u-s-destroyer-donald-cook-returns-black-sea https://groups.google.com/g/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/c/fnMwKKdelL4?pli=1 https://news.usni.org/2016/06/06/video-u-s-destroyer-enters-black-sea-first-time-2016 Edited February 7, 2023 by Chris farley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2023 Author Share Posted February 7, 2023 The EU’s energy war with Russia has entered a new phase — and there are signs that the Kremlin is starting to feel the pain. The Kremlin’s tax income from oil and gas in January was among its lowest monthly totals since the depths of COVID in 2020, according to Janis Kluge, senior associate at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. Kluge noted that while Russia’s 2023 budget anticipates 9 trillion rubles (€120 billion) in fossil fuel income, in January it earned only 425 billion rubles from oil and gas taxes, around half compared to the same month last year. It's only one month's figures and the income does fluctuate, but Kluge called it "a bad start." Russia’s gas sales to Europe have also collapsed — in part as a result of Moscow's own energy blackmail — with its share of imports declining from around 40 percent throughout 2021 to 13 percent for November 2022, according to the latest confirmed European Commission monthly figure. https://www.politico.eu/article/russia-oil-revenue-plunge-european-union-sanctions-war-round-two-ukraine/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 8, 2023 Author Share Posted February 8, 2023 The Russian military may be rushing to launch an offensive to capture the Donetsk region “in an unrealistic timeframe,” the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War think tank said Tuesday. The ISW said the Kremlin was unlikely to have the combat power necessary for the push, citing a British Defense Ministry assessment that said Russian forces have gained only several hundred meters of territory per week. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/02/08/russia-ukraine-war-latest-updates/ Rush rush rush ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts