Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

This thread has gone strangely quiet. We used to get weekly gushing updates about Tucker's latest gem.

 

I hear Laura Loomer is now considered the slightly more sane (less insane?) one in MAGA world. Takes some doing.

The guy has decided to become a fringe kook. Best of luck. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Oh, and that happened just now. Some of us mistakenly thought he was a fringe kook ever since he left The Weekly Standard.

It’s as if you think that “disagreeable” and “fringe kook” are one and the same. As you are someone that imagines himself as “fiercely independent” I trust your opinion on the matter is not political in nature. Good for you. 
 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

It’s as if you think that “disagreeable” and “fringe kook” are one and the same. As you are someone that imagines himself as “fiercely independent” I trust your opinion on the matter is not political in nature. Good for you. 
 

 

Maybe Tucker will spot Ray Epps in the crowd at Utah Valley University.

Just admit that you loved Tucker until he went in too deep on the conspiracy theories for your taste.

Posted
48 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Maybe Tucker will spot Ray Epps in the crowd at Utah Valley University.

Just admit that you loved Tucker until he went in too deep on the conspiracy theories for your taste.

If you can find a post where I wax romantic about Tucker Carlson, I will indulge your latest idiocy. Let me know if you need help with the search function. 

Posted
2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Maybe Tucker will spot Ray Epps in the crowd at Utah Valley University.

Just admit that you loved Tucker until he went in too deep on the conspiracy theories for your taste.

I was talking to a guy I know, and who I think is a good dude, during the Biden admin.   We got to talking about all that and he told me, calmly, rationally his theory on who was really in charge, the election of Biden v Trump and I asked him about stolen elections.   His theory was that Trump won, was in power and that Biden was dead and it was all going to come out in a couple weeks.  Trump triumphant, Trump Deep State etc.   He saw the look on my face, said “I lost you with Biden being dead, huh?”.  Truth is he lost me before that, but I said “Yeah, I don’t think that’s true.”.  He kinda shrugged, laughed and told me his wife says he always loses people when he revealed that Biden was dead (natural causes btw,  he had actually been dead for a while).   
 

That was a few years ago and as sure as I’m sitting here, he just laid out the facts as he saw them.   If I saw him today at the supermarket, car wash whatever, a very likable guy who wasn’t looking for trouble or a fight.    I just don’t ever understand how he got there.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I was talking to a guy I know, and who I think is a good dude, during the Biden admin.   We got to talking about all that and he told me, calmly, rationally his theory on who was really in charge, the election of Biden v Trump and I asked him about stolen elections.   His theory was that Trump won, was in power and that Biden was dead and it was all going to come out in a couple weeks.  Trump triumphant, Trump Deep State etc.   He saw the look on my face, said “I lost you with Biden being dead, huh?”.  Truth is he lost me before that, but I said “Yeah, I don’t think that’s true.”.  He kinda shrugged, laughed and told me his wife says he always loses people when he revealed that Biden was dead (natural causes btw,  he had actually been dead for a while).   
 

That was a few years ago and as sure as I’m sitting here, he just laid out the facts as he saw them.   If I saw him today at the supermarket, car wash whatever, a very likable guy who wasn’t looking for trouble or a fight.    I just don’t ever understand how he got there.  

This is what I mean. It starts small (some evil group of people is secretly running something behind the scenes), and we've seen that once someone takes that step it's not that difficult to convince them that Charile Kirk was wearing an exploding mic and that Mossad did it.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

This is what I mean. It starts small (some evil group of people is secretly running something behind the scenes), and we've seen that once someone takes that step it's not that difficult to convince them that Charile Kirk was wearing an exploding mic and that Mossad did it.

So, I get some of the theories…..expanding.  9/11 implosion for example.   Someone says the building collapsed funny and scientifically it looked like a controlled demolition….and next thing you know everyone is quoting like they are a structural engineer with a minor in architecture who worked for 20 years in the demolition game. 
 

The whys and hows of Biden being deceased…not so much.  Then again Fergie thinks I run with @ComradeKayAdams as an alternate screen name for reasons I’ve never quite understood, and some fools  worship Luigi Mangione.  

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Shocked 1
×
×
  • Create New...