Jump to content

Trump Impeachment 2.0


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, snafu said:

Why NOT ask these questions (I'm referring to November, 2020)?  What is the harm in answering?  We saw the harm in dismissing the questions out of hand on January 6th.

 

Many questions have been answered.  What led to January 6th was a disinformation campaign by a sore loser, his sycophants, a right wing propaganda media that masquerade as "news" and a compliant cult following that filters out news they don't want to hear.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Scraps said:

 

Many questions have been answered.  What led to January 6th was a disinformation campaign by a sore loser, his sycophants, a right wing propaganda media that masquerade as "news" and a compliant cult following that filters out news they don't want to hear.

 

Look, all Trump did was tell thousands of people to go over to the Capitol while Congress was certifying the election and fight like hell to make Mike Pence change the results so Trump would win. 

 

Where's the harm in that?  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Because this is peak stupid.....and this is just a gigantic Democrat Campaign Ad---theater for soundbites and future narratives for the next wave of idiots in America for the next election which is non stop bc its always election day in America.

 

 

 

 

Every other word out of Elizabeth Warren's mouth is fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Every other word out of Elizabeth Warren's mouth is fight.

How often have Raskin, Biden, Warren or any other politician asked people to show up in DC, direct them to go to the capitol and fight then sit back and gloat while a riot ensued, gallows were erected, police beaten with poles, pepper sprayed and crushed in doors?

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Because this is peak stupid.....and this is just a gigantic Democrat Campaign Ad---theater for soundbites and future narratives for the next wave of idiots in America for the next election which is non stop bc its always election day in America.

 

 

 

27e3eefb668e3e16d5d2c5649bc97954.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Scraps said:

How often have Raskin, Biden, Warren or any other politician asked people to show up in DC, direct them to go to the capitol and fight then sit back and gloat while a riot ensued, gallows were erected, police beaten with poles, pepper sprayed and crushed in doors?

 

I don't think they have.

 

However, Raskin didn't accept the results of the 2016 election and challenged the results on January 6, 2017 like Ted Cruz did in 2021 and was called out of order by Vice President Biden.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Scraps said:

How often have Raskin, Biden, Warren or any other politician asked people to show up in DC, direct them to go to the capitol and fight then sit back and gloat while a riot ensued, gallows were erected, police beaten with poles, pepper sprayed and crushed in doors?


But none of the Trumpholes can defend why Trump had a rally on 1/6? What was the purpose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I don't think they have.

 

However, Raskin didn't accept the results of the 2016 election and challenged the results on January 6, 2017 like Ted Cruz did in 2021 and was called out of order by Vice President Biden.

 

 

So what's your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

You brought up Raskin.  Its an interesting thing he did.  Did you know he did that?

I did not bring up Raskin.  I responded to someone else who brought up Raskin.  I did not know he did that and I don't know why you think this is so relevant.  So what's your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Scraps said:

How often have Raskin, Biden, Warren or any other politician asked people to show up in DC, direct them to go to the capitol and fight then sit back and gloat while a riot ensued, gallows were erected, police beaten with poles, pepper sprayed and crushed in doors?

 

10 minutes ago, Scraps said:

I did not bring up Raskin.  I responded to someone else who brought up Raskin.  I did not know he did that and I don't know why you think this is so relevant.  So what's your point?

 

Oh really?

 

I just think its rich that the guy that didn't accept the results of the election and tried to overturn the will of the people by challenging the awarding of legally elected electors 4 years ago is running the impeachment, that's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

Oh really?

Really.  Big Blitz, the person you responded to, brought up Raskin.  I was responding about Democrats brought it both your and his posts.

 

25 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

I just think its rich that the guy that didn't accept the results of the election and tried to overturn the will of the people by challenging the awarding of legally elected electors 4 years ago is running the impeachment, that's all.

 

I don't find it particularly relevant that he objected to 10 electors on some technical matter and was overruled by another person that Big Blitz brought up.  Its not as if he incited an insurrection then sat back an gloated like Trump did.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Scraps said:

Really.  Big Blitz, the person you responded to, brought up Raskin.  I was responding about Democrats brought it both your and his posts.

 

 

I don't find it particularly relevant that he objected to 10 electors on some technical matter and was overruled by another person that Big Blitz brought up.  Its not as if he incited an insurrection then sat back an gloated like Trump did.

 

OK I finally looked at the tweet from Big Blitz.  Not really into tweets.  I just saw your response to me.

 

So what if its not relevant?  Since when do responses around here have to be relevant?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

OK I finally looked at the tweet from Big Blitz.  Not really into tweets.  I just saw your response to me.

 

So what if its not relevant?  Since when do responses around here have to be relevant?

 

Well it kind of helps in a conversation to make relevant responses.  Why should anybody bother to pay attention to you if what you say is irrelevant?

 

Edited by Scraps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...